Skip to main content

Designing Resilience into Service Supply Chains: A Conceptual Methodology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Supply Chain Risk Management

Abstract

This chapter presents a methodology for designing resilient service supply chains. The approach combines system design methods with methods from risk assessment. Service supply chains consist of multiple assets, cooperating to fulfill an operation. Each asset has functionality to perform a set of tasks in the operation, and the combined functionalities of the fleet of assets must cover the activities the service supply chain are to perform. When a module in one asset in the fleet experiences loss of functionality, it constitutes a disruption in the service supply chain, a failure mode. The objective of the proposed methodology is to give decision support reducing the vulnerabilities of the service supply chain through design actions that can increase overall service supply chain resilience. The methodology consists of four steps. The first step includes breakdown of operation and service supply chain, mapping of modules to tasks, and selection of service supply chain configuration based on costs and utility. In the second step, failure modes are identified and their criticality assessed. In the third step, we propose design changes to reduce the impact of disruptions. These are evaluated in Step 4, where decisions regarding redesign are made. The recommendations from this methodology can be used to plan for how to redesign in the case of contingencies, or be used as part of an iterative process where the new information is incorporated in the evaluation of initial service supply chain design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Asbjørnslett, B. E. (2009). Assessing the vulnerability of supply chains. In G. A. Zsidisin & B. Ritchie (Eds.), Supply chain risk—A handbook of assessment, management, and performance (pp. 15–33). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asbjørnslett, B. E., Norstad, I., & Berle, Ø. (2012). Risk-based design of maritime transport systems. In P. Hokstad, I. B. Utne, & J. Vatn (Eds.), Risk and interdependencies in critical infrastructures (pp. 161–174). London, UK: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Asbjørnslett, B. E., & Rausand, M. (1999). Assess the vulnerability of your production system. Production Planning & Control, 10(3), 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berle, Ø., Asbjørnslett, B. E., & Rice, J. B., Jr. (2011a). Formal vulnerability assessment of a maritime transportation system. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 96(6), 696–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berle, Ø., Rice, J. B., Jr., & Asbjørnslett, B. E. (2011b). Failure modes in the maritime transportation system: A functional approach to throughput vulnerability. Maritime Policy & Management, 38(6), 605–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craighead, C. W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M. J., & Handfield, R. B. (2007). The severity of supply chain disruptions: Design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision Sciences, 38(1), 131–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Weck, O. L., Roos, D., & Magee, C. L. (2011). Engineering systems: Meeting human needs in a complex technological world. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppinger, S. D., & Browning, T. R. (2012). Design structure matrix: Methods and applications. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, M. E. & Ross, A. M. (2012a). Mitigating contextual uncertainties with valuable changeability analysis in the multi-epoch domain. In 6th Annual IEEE Systems Conference (pp. 281–288).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, M. E. & Ross, A. M. (2012b). Sustaining lifecycle value: Valuable changeability analysis with era simulation. In 6th Annual IEEE Systems Conference (pp. 202–208).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, H. L., & Hastings, D. E. (2006). A framework for understanding uncertainty and its mitigation and exploitation in complex systems. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 34(3), 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanikolaou, A. D. (2009). Risk-based ship design. In: A. D. Papanikolaou (Ed.), Springer: Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, H. (2005). Drivers of supply chain vulnerability: An integrated framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(3/4), 210–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, H., Abley, M., Christopher, M., Hayford, M., Saw, R., Rutherford, C., et al. (2003). Creating resilient supply chains: A practical guide. Cranfield, UK. Available at http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/4374

  • Rausand, M. (2011). Risk assessment: Theory, methods, and applications (1st ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. B., Jr., & Caniato, F. (2003). Building a secure and resilient supply network. Supply Chain Management Review, 7(5), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. M., & Hastings, D. E. (2005). The tradespace exploration paradigm. In INCOSE International Symposium 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. M., Rhodes, D. H., & Hastings, D. E. (2008). Defining changeability: Reconciling flexibility, adaptability, scalability, modifiability, and robustness for maintaining system lifecycle value. Systems Engineering, 11(3), 246–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi, Y., & Rice, J. B., Jr. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, D. V. (1981). The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-28(3), 71–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasson, C. S. (2005). System analysis, design, and development: Concepts, principles, and practices. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sigurd S. Pettersen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pettersen, S.S., Asbjørnslett, B.E., Erikstad, S.O. (2018). Designing Resilience into Service Supply Chains: A Conceptual Methodology. In: Khojasteh, Y. (eds) Supply Chain Risk Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4106-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics