Skip to main content

The Future of Teacher Education: Evidence, Competence or Wisdom?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Companion to Research in Teacher Education

Abstract

In recent years policymakers and politicians in many countries have become increasingly interested in teacher education. In most cases, however, the interest in teacher education is not informed by a desire to enhance the professionalism of teachers but rather is part of ongoing attempts to control the educational 'enterprise.' In this chapter I analyse these developments, particularly with regard to a focus on the alleged need for 'evidence' to form the basis for teaching or the idea that teaching can be adequalty captured in terms of competences. Against these tendencies I argue for the important role teacher judgement plays in education, make clear why such judgement is needed, and what this would require for teacher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.education.gov.uk/b0068570/the-importance-of-teaching/. Retrieved 27 Feb 2011.

  2. 2.

    http://www.reviewofteachereducationinscotland.org.uk/teachingscotlandsfuture/index.asp. Retrieved 27 Feb 2011.

  3. 3.

    http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/00100-r1.en0.htm. Retrieved 27 Feb 2011.

  4. 4.

    www.oecd/edu/teacherpolicy. Retrieved 27 Feb 2011.

  5. 5.

    http://ec.europa.eu/education/com392_en.pdf. Retrieved 27 Feb 2011.

  6. 6.

    http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/2010/doc/principles_en.pdf. Retrieved 27 Feb 2011.

  7. 7.

    From http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/2010/doc/principles_en.pdf. Retrieved 27 Feb 2011.

  8. 8.

    In my view the priority of Steiner education lies with the person and with the freedom of the person. That does not mean that the other two dimensions—subjectification and socialisation—do not matter in Steiner education, but they do not simply matter in themselves but always as ways in which the person can ‘encounter’ the world and through this can also ‘encounter’ himself or herself. This suggests the importance of using the Venn diagram in a dynamic way, so that a particular school conception is not simply represented as a position in the diagram, but has to be identified through where its starting point is located and how, from this starting point, it relates to the different dimensions of education.

  9. 9.

    An interesting question here is whether we should only focus on those who exemplify educational virtuosity, or whether we can also learn from studying those who do not exemplify this virtuosity. The more general question here is whether we can learn most from good examples or from bad examples. With regard to educational virtuosity I am inclined to argue that it is only when we have developed a sense of what virtuosity looks like, that we can begin to learn from those cases where such virtuosity is absent.

References

  • Aristotle. (1980). The Nicomachean ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2004). Against learning. Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning. Nordisk Pedagogik, 23(1), 70–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Beyond learning. Democratic education for a human future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2007). Why ‘what works’ won’t work. Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit of educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2010a). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2010b). Why ‘what works’ still won’t work. From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(5), 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2010c). Evidenz und Werte in Erziehung und Bildung. Drei weitere Defizite evidenzbasierter Praxis. In H.-U. Otto, A. Polutta & H. Ziegler (Hrsg.) (Eds.), What works—Welches Wissen braucht die Soziale Arbeit? (pp. 99–115). Opladen: Barbara Burdich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2011a). De school als toegang tot de wereld: Een pedagogische kijk op goed onderwijs. In R. Klarus & W. Wardekker (Eds.), Wat is goed onderwijs? Bijdragen uit de pedagogiek (pp. 15–35). Den Haag: Boom Lemma Uitgevers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2011b). God utbildning i mätningens tidevarv. Stockholm: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W. (1987). What is an educational practice? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 21(2), 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, R. D. (2008). Key competencies for education in a European context. European Educational Research Journal, 7(3), 311–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (2003). National vocational qualifications in England—Description and analysis of an alternative qualification system. In G. Straka (Ed.), Zertifizierung non-formell und informell erworbener beruflicher Kompetenzen, Münster, New York, München & Berlin: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1899). Talks to teachers on psychology: And to students on some of life’s ideals. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, M., Weigel, T., & Collins, K. (2007). The concept of competence concept in the development of vocational education and training in selected EU member states. A critical analysis. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 59(1), 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This text is based on my keynote presentation at the “2020 The Future of Teacher Education” conference, Vienna, 3–4 March 2011. I would like to thank the organisers of the conference for the invitation to share my ideas, and the audience for questions and insightful feedback that has helped me to develop my ideas further. A version of the presentation was published in 2012 in the open access journal Research on Steiner Education 3(1), 8–21.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gert Biesta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Biesta, G. (2017). The Future of Teacher Education: Evidence, Competence or Wisdom?. In: Peters, M., Cowie, B., Menter, I. (eds) A Companion to Research in Teacher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4075-7_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4075-7_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4073-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4075-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics