Skip to main content

A QUEST for Sustainable Continuing Professional Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Companion to Research in Teacher Education

Abstract

Continuing Professional Development (CPD) can be a crucial factor in improving teaching, and student learning (Little in Professional community and professional development in the learning-centered school. National Education Association NEA, Washington, 2006). Extant research suggests consensus pertaining to the core features of effective CPD including content focus, active learning, coherence, duration, collaborative activities and collective participation (Desimone in Educ Researcher 38(3):181–199, 2009; van Driel et al. in Stud Sci Educ, 48(2):129–160, 2012). More typically, however, teachers experience professional development as episodic, superficial and disconnected from their day-to-day teaching and recurring problems of practice (Little in Professional community and professional development in the learning-centered school. National Education Association NEA, Washington, 2006). Even when CPD-programs are designed according to the mentioned consensus criteria, there is often a lack of knowledge about the sustainability of the effects (Avalos in Teach Teacher Educ 27(1):10–20, 2011).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy—The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., & Donovan, S. (2005). How students learn—Science in the classroom. Washington DC: The National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 948–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2005). Policy and change: Getting beyond bureaucracy. In A. Heargreaves (Ed.), Extending educational change (pp. 362–387). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W. (2006). Professional community and professional development in the learning-centered school. Washington: National Education Association NEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. A., & Hewson, P. W. (2014). Research on teacher professional development programs in science. In N. G. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (Vol. II, pp. 889–909). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, B. L. (2012). Science teachers’ meaning-making when involved in a school-based professional development project. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(6), 621–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, B. L. (2014). Students’ annotated drawings as a mediating artefact in science teachers’ professional development. NorDiNa, 10(2), 162–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H. (2011). Realizing the power of professional learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J., Meirink, J. A., van Veen, K., & Zwart, R. C. (2012). Current trends and missing links in studies on teacher professional development in science education: A review of design features and quality of research. Studies in Science Education, 48(2), 129–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birgitte Lund Nielsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nielsen, B.L. (2017). A QUEST for Sustainable Continuing Professional Development. In: Peters, M., Cowie, B., Menter, I. (eds) A Companion to Research in Teacher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4075-7_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4075-7_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4073-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4075-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics