Abstract
At a national level, the Australian Government has two main HTA committees that make recommendations to the health minister/government for public funding of health interventions. These are the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) for medications and vaccines and Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC) for medical services, diagnostics, and devices. Both have at least one patient representative (sometimes two) on their expert committees and provide opportunities for public and patient input, either as individuals or as organized support groups. Consultation takes place at different stages of the HTA process. PBAC has an input process at appraisal stage, whereas for medical services input is sought at the protocol or scoping stage with specific questions to address. While other HTA activities occur outside these processes—including at a state, hospital, and private health insurance level—in this chapter we focus on review and reform in patient involvement centered primarily on these two programs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bastian H. Speaking up for ourselves: the evolution of consumer advocacy in health care. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998;14:3–23.
Consumer Health Forum of Australia (CHF). Real people, real data. 2013. https://ourhealth.org.au/content/real-people-real-data-toolkit#.WBaHq9J97IU. Accessed 31 Oct 2016.
Department of Health. Medicare benefits schedule review. 2015. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/mbsreviewtaskforce. Accessed 17 July 2016.
Department of Health and Ageing. Review of health technology assessment in Australia. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. 2009. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/hta-review-report.
Department of Health and Ageing. Development of a quality framework for the medicare benefits schedule. 2010. https://www.chf.org.au/pdfs/chf/DoHA_Information_Paper_Development_of_a_Quality_Framework_for_the_MBS_Discussion_Paper.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2016.
Ley S. More consumer consultation in PBS process. 2015. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/ministers/publishing.nsf/Content/health-mediarel-yr2015-ley016.htm. Accessed 12 Feb 2016.
Lopert R. Evidence-based decision-making within Australia’s pharmaceutical benefits scheme. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2009;60:1–13.
Lopes E, Street J, Carter D, Merlin T. Involving patients in health technology funding decisions: stakeholder perspectives on processes used in Australia. Health Expect. 2016;19:331–44. doi:10.1111/hex.12356.
MacKenzie R, Chapman S, Salkeld G, Holding S. Media influence on Herceptin subsidization in Australia: application of the rule of rescue? J R Soc Med. 2008;101:305–12.
Parliament of Australia. Availability of new, innovative and specialist cancer drugs in Australia. 2015. http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs/Cancer_Drugs/Report. Accessed 2 July 2016.
Productivity Commission Efficiency in Health, Commission Research Paper, Canberra. 2015. http://www.pc.gov.au/research/completed/efficiency-health/efficiency-health.pdf, Accessed 3 Aug 2016.
Productivity Commission. Impacts of advances in medical technology in Australia. Research Report, Melbourne. 2005. http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/medical-technology/ report/medicaltechnology.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2016.
Tong A. CHF real people, real data project–pilot phase evaluation. 2014. https://ourhealth.org.au/sites/default/files/docs/chf_rprd_external_evaluation.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2016.
Wortley S, Wale J, Grainger D, Murphy P. Moving beyond the rhetoric of patient input in health technology assessment deliberations. Aust Health Rev. 2016; doi:10.1071/AH1521.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge comments received from all the reviewers while revising the original transcript, particularly Ann Single. All views expressed and any errors are entirely the responsibility of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wortley, S., Wale, J.L. (2017). Australia. In: Facey, K., Ploug Hansen, H., Single, A. (eds) Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment. Adis, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4068-9_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4068-9_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Adis, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4067-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4068-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)