Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Conceptualisation of austerity in the Portuguese, Spanish and Irish Press

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Cultural Linguistics

Part of the book series: Cultural Linguistics ((CL))

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to analyse the conceptualisation of austerity in three different European cultures by identifying metaphorical expressions used in one representative newspaper of the Portuguese, the Spanish and the Irish press between 2011 and 2012. The metaphors were identified by searching for three keywords from the field of economy and politics (austeridade-austeridad-austerity, corte-recorte-cut and dívida-deuda-debt) and were then classified according to the type of schema they instantiate, namely, propositional schema, image schema or event schema. Assuming the general framework of Cultural Linguistics and corpus-based and discourse-based approaches to conceptual metaphor, the study highlights how metaphor can be a powerful conceptual and discourse strategy to frame economic, political and social issues and to serve emotional and ideological purposes. Through metaphor, the strongly mediatised political and economic debate about austerity measures and policies becomes effectively persuasive and manipulative. The analysis shows that the newspapers resort to the same schemas and metaphors. However, the differences in the frequency of the types of schema and the specific metaphors suggest that different socio-historical and cultural conceptualisations result in the different types and rates of metaphors in the three cultures under analysis, i.e. a deep conservative morality of self-discipline and punishment, in the case of Portugal; a strong sense of outrage against austerity measures and their creditors, in Spain; and the idea that the crisis and its effects were hitting the country but not as seriously as others, in Ireland.

This study has been carried out under the research project UID/FIL/00683/2013, funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology and the research projects FFI2012-30790 and FFI2016-77540P, funded by the Spanish MINECO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Público (401.000), El País (1.500.000) and Irish Times (427.000).

References

  • Augoustinos, M., Walker, I., & Donaghue, N. (2006). Social cognition: An integrated introduction. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, M. (2000). Usage, blends, and grammar. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 315–345). Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernárdez, E. (1995). Teoría y epistemología del texto. Madrid: Cátedra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernárdez, E. (2008a). El lenguaje como cultura. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernárdez, E. (2008b). Collective cognition and individual activity: Variation, language and culture. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke, & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language, and mind. Vol. 2. Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 137–166). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernárdez, E. (2016). From butchers and surgeons to the linguistic method. On language and cognition as supraindividual phenomena. In M. Romano & M. D. Porto (Eds.), Exploring discourse strategies in socio-cognitive interaction: A multimodal and cross-linguistic approach (pp. 21–38). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, L., & Brandt, P. A. (2005). Making sense of a blend. A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 216–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric. The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charteris-Black, J. (2013). What is the purpose of metaphor in political discourse? An answer from critical metaphor analysis. In A. Soares da Silva, C. Martins, L. Magalhães, & M. Gonçalves (Eds.), Comunicação política e económica: Dimensões cognitivas e discursivas (pp. 69–87). Braga: Aletheia, Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, P. (1996). Security metaphors, cold war discourse from containment to common European home. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Vera, J. (2015). Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures: Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dirven, R., Polzenhagen, F., & Wolf, H. G. (2007). Cognitive linguistics, ideology, and critical discourse analysis. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 1222–1240). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. M. (2008). The language-organism-species analogy: A complex adaptative systems approach to shifting perspectives on “language”. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language and mind. Vol 2. Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 215—262). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. M. (2015). Cultural linguistics and the future agenda for research on language and culture. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 493–512). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. M., Dirven, R., Ziemke, T., & Bernárdez, E. (Eds.), (2008). Body, language, and mind. Vol 2. Sociocultural situatedness. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geeraerts, D. (2006). Methodology in cognitive linguistics. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics. Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 21–49). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geeraerts, D., & Grondelaers, S. (1995). Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In J. R. Taylor & R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp. 153–179). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geeraerts, D., Grondelaers, S., & Bakema, P. (1994). The structure of lexical variation. Meaning, naming, and context. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geeraerts, D., Kristiansen, G., & Peirsman, Y. (Eds.). (2010). Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, D., & Fischer, K. (Eds.). (2010). Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C. (2014). Discourse, grammar and ideology: Functional and cognitive perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C. (2015). Discourse. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 322–346). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller, V. (2004). Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koller, V. (2013). Socio-cognitive approaches to corporate discourse. In A. Soares da Silva, C. Martins, L. Magalhães, & M. Gonçalves (Eds.), Comunicação política e económica: Dimensões cognitivas e discursivas (pp. 89–103). Braga: Aletheia, Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller, V. (2014). Cognitive linguistics and ideology. In J. Littlemore & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics (pp. 234–252). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor. A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kövecses, Z. (2009). The effect of context on the use of metaphor in discourse. Iberica, 17, 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kövecses, Z. (2010). A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 663–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen, G., & Dirven, R. (Eds.). (2008). Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen, G., Dirven, R., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (Eds.). (2006). Applications of cognitive linguistics: Foundations and fields of application. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen, G., & Geeraerts, D. (2013). Contexts and usage in cognitive sociolinguistics. Journal of Pragmatics, 52, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics. How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an Elephant! Know your values and frame the debate: The essential guide for progressives. New York: Chelsea Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R. (1994). Culture, cognition, and grammar. In M. Pütz (Ed.), Language contact and language conflict (pp. 25–53). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R. (2001). Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), 143–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, J., & Ziemke, T. (2002). Social situatedness of natural and artificial intelligence: Vigotsky and beyond. Adaptive Behaviour, 11(2), 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno Lara, M. A. (2008). La metáfora en el lenguaje político de la prensa americana. Comares: Modelos cognitivos y formación de significado. Granada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse. Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Musolff, A., & Zinken, J. (Eds.). (2009). Metaphor and discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, G. B. (1996). Towards a theory of cultural linguistics. Austin: University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pishwa, H. (Ed.). (2009). Language and social cognition. Expression of the social mind. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pütz, M., Robinson, J. A., & Reif, M. (Eds.). (2014). Cognitive sociolinguistics: Social and cultural variation in cognition and language use. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, N. (1987). Convergent evidence for a cultural model of American marriage. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 173–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, N., & Holland, D. (Eds.). (1987). Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reif, M., Robinson, J. A., & Pütz, M. (Eds.). (2013). Variation in language and language use. Linguistic, socio-cultural and cognitive perspectives. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojo López, A. M., & Orts Llopis, M. A. (2010). Metaphorical pattern analysis in financial texts: Framing the crisis in positive or negative metaphorical terms. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 3300–3313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano, M., & Porto, M. D. (2016). Exploring discourse strategies in socio-cognitive interaction: A multimodal and cross-linguistic approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardinha, T. B. (2011). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 11(2), 329–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale/New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharifian, F. (2008). Distributed, emergent cultural cognition, conceptualization and language. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke, & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language and mind. Vol. 2. Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 109–136). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharifian, F. (2009). On collective cognition and language. In H. Pishwa (Ed.), Language and social cognition: Expression of the social mind (pp. 163–180). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharifian, F. (2011). Cultural conceptualizations and language: Theoretical framework and applications. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifian, F. (2015). Cultural linguistics. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 473–492). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharifian, F. (2017). Cultural linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 53–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares da Silva, A. (2006). O mundo dos sentidos em português: Polissemia, semântica e cognição [The world of senses in Portuguese: Polysemy, semantics and cognition]. Coimbra: Almedina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares da Silva, A. (2013). O que sabemos sobre a crise económica, pela metáfora. Conceptualizações metafóricas da crise na imprensa portuguesa [What we know about the economic crisis through metaphor. Metaphorical conceptualizations of the crisis in the Portuguese press]. Revista Media & Jornalismo, 23(1), 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares da Silva, A. (2016). The persuasive (and manipulative) power of metaphor in ‘austerity’ discourse: A corpus-based analysis of embodied and moral metaphors of austerity in the Portuguese Press. In M. Romano & M. D. Porto (Eds.), Exploring discourse strategies in socio-cognitive interaction: A multimodal and cross-linguistic approach (pp. 79–108). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, G. J. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor—Now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steen, G. J. (2014). The cognitive-linguistic revolution in metaphor studies. In J. Littlemore & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics (pp. 117–142). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 1–16). Berlin/NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2006). Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vereza, S. C. (2007). Metáfora e argumentação: Uma abordagem cognitivo-discursiva [Metaphor and argumentation: A cognitive-discursive approach]. Linguagem em (Dis)curso, 7(3), 487–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vereza, S. C. (2013). Discourse, cognition and figurative language: Exploring metaphors in political editorials. In A. Soares da Silva, C. Martins, L. Magalhães, & M. Gonçalves (Eds.), Comunicação política e económica: Dimensões cognitivas e discursivas (pp. 395–406). Braga: Aletheia, Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatev, J. (1997). Situated embodiment: Studies in the emergence of spatial meaning. Stockholm: Gotab.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Catholic University of Portugal, Braga, Portugal

    Augusto Soares da Silva

  2. University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

    Maria Josep Cuenca

  3. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

    Manuela Romano

Authors
  1. Augusto Soares da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Josep Cuenca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Manuela Romano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Augusto Soares da Silva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

    Farzad Sharifian

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Soares da Silva, A., Cuenca, M.J., Romano, M. (2017). The Conceptualisation of austerity in the Portuguese, Spanish and Irish Press. In: Sharifian, F. (eds) Advances in Cultural Linguistics. Cultural Linguistics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4056-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4056-6_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4055-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4056-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation