Skip to main content

The Neo-confucian Discourse on “Stilling Nature” in the Works of Cheng Hao, Zhu Xi, and Zhen Dexiu

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 607 Accesses

Abstract

The Neo-confucian notion of “stilling nature” 定-性 (dingxing) became a central feature of Neo-confucian discourse with Cheng Hao’s 程顥(1032–1085).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    No sooner was the discourse of stilling nature established than it became a classic of Lixue 理学(the school of li or principles). It was included in a number of compilations including Reflections on Things at Hand(compiled by Zhu Xi and Lü Zuqian, South Song), Essentials of Lixue (compiled by Geng Jie, Qing), Basics on Nature and Principle (complied by Ran Jinzu, Qing Period) and deeply influenced intellectuals in the Song and Ming periods. Successive Neo-Confucian and Xinxue Confucian scholars unexceptionally used it to expound on their own theories. He Xiang, a Xinxue scholar in the Ming dynasty, in his painstaking research on nature and principles, came upon Cheng Hao’s On Recognizing Ren and The Letter on Stilling Nature, and was immediately convinced. His two-volume Commentaries on Recognizing Ren and Stilling Nature was thus commented on by Comprehensive Catalogue and Collected Abstracts of the Siku quanshu: “Xiang’s learning can be traced back to Yao Jiang (Wang Yangming); most arguments in this book are justifications of Xinxue” (Abstracts of Imperial Siku quanshu, Vol. 96). Liu Zongzhou, a master in the Ming Dynasty, complied Guiding Classics of the Sacred Learning in which he gave detailed commentaries on key classics including Zhou Dunyi’s Diagram of the Supreme Ultimate and Explanations, Zhang Zai’s Eastern Inscription and Western Inscription, Cheng Hao’s On Recognizing Ren and The Letter on Stilling Nature, Zhu Xi’s On Middleness and Harmony, Wang Yangming’s Questions and Answers on Conscience, etc. (Ibid., Vol. 93). On the other hand, among the Neo-Confucian scholars who annotated The Letter on Stilling Nature in the Southern Song period are famous figures like Zhu Xi, Ye Cai and Zhen Dexiu. In his Collected Explanations of Reflections on Things at Hand, Ye Cai gave a line by line commentary of The Letter on Stilling Nature. As a student of Zhu Xi’s student, Ye’s thoughts resembled that of Zhu’s.Their creative elucidations greatly enriched Cheng Hao’s doctrine of stilling nature.

  2. 2.

    Translations of The Letter on Stilling Nature consulted Chan (1963), pp. 525–526.

  3. 3.

    Mou’s understanding deserves further consideration, and he goes on to write that, while Cheng Hao and Zhang Zai undoubtedly had different understandings of nature, if it could not finally be stilled, then all of their ideas about it would be baseless. Both Cheng Hao and Zhang Zai had tried to explain the state of one’s nature by taking recourse to “vital force” 气 ( qi) , which they felt accounted for the goodness or evil in one’s nature, but stilling nature is to let it rest in its perfect and original goodness.

References

  • Cai, R. (1984). Song Ming Lixue • Beisong pian 宋明理學 • 北宋篇 (Song and Ming Neo-Confucianism: Volume of the Northern Song). Taipei: Taiwan xuesheng shuju.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, W.-T. (1963). A source book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L. (1991). Song Ming Lixue 宋明理學 (Song and Ming Neo-Confucianism). Shenyang: Liaoning jiaoyu chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L. (2000). Zhuzi zhexue yanjiu 朱子哲學研究 (A study of Zhu Xi’s Philosophy). Shanghai: Huadong shifan daxue chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Z. (2007). Song Yuan Xue An 宋元學案 (Intellectual cases of Song and Yuan) (Vol. 81). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia, K. (1979). “真德秀.” Zhongguo lidai sixiangjia 中國歷代思想家 (Great Thinkers in Chinese History). Taipei: Taiwan shangwu yinshuguan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mou, Z. (1968a). “Song Ming Ruxue zhi Keti” 宋明儒學之課題 (A topic of confucianism of the Song and Ming Dynasties). In: Xingti yu Xingti 心體與性體 (The Form of Mind and That of Nature), Vol. 1. Taipei: Zhengzhong Shuju.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mou, Z. (1968b). Xinti Yu Xingti 心體與性體 (The form of mind and the form of its nature), Vol. 1. Taipei: Zhongzheng Shuju (Zhongzheng Book Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, C. (2006). Jin Si Lu Jijie 近思錄集解 (Collected commentaries to reflections on things at hand). Beijing: Beijing Tushuguan Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renqiu Zhu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and Higher Education Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhu, R. (2017). The Neo-confucian Discourse on “Stilling Nature” in the Works of Cheng Hao, Zhu Xi, and Zhen Dexiu. In: Yao, X. (eds) Reconceptualizing Confucian Philosophy in the 21st Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4000-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics