Advertisement

Feist, Not a New-Line of Jurisprudence

Chapter
  • 207 Downloads

Abstract

It was believed that Feist decision replaced ‘sweat of the brow’ argument for providing copyright protection to factual compilations. Removal of sweat of the brow theory from the ambit of copyright protection was held detrimental for future production of databases. This chapter shows that Feist decision was not unique and it re-iterated existing copyright law in US. Feist tried to resolve the conflict relating to the threshold of originality in limited circuits. The threshold standard stated for copyright protection was not a surprise for the US Copyright Office. Further, the guidelines of Feist decision have been consistently followed in decisions dealing with the question of copyrightability of factual compilations.

Keywords

Copyright Protection Telephone Directory Copyright Infringement Constitutional Requirement Warren Publishing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Intellectual Property and Technology Law, Jindal Global Law SchoolO.P. Jindal Global UniversitySonipatIndia

Personalised recommendations