Advertisement

Potential Impact of Climate Change on Surface Water and Groundwater Interactions in Lower Reaches of Ganges River, India

  • Syed Aaquib Hussain
  • Kousik Das
  • Soumendra Nath Bhanja
  • Abhijit MukherjeeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Hydrogeology book series (SPRINGERHYDRO)

Abstract

Present projections of climate change scenario show an increase in global temperature and CO2 content, which have indirect impacts on surface water flow, but rainfall has direct impacts on surface run-off and groundwater storage system. This study investigates the effect of climate change on aquifer storage and surface run-off, and interactions with the river Bhagirathi-Hooghly, the lowermost reach of Ganges River in Indian state of West Bengal, by considering changes in rainfall events from 1999 to 2013. From time series analyses, it has been shown that there is a linear decreasing trend of rainfall in the selected study area in Nadia district of West Bengal. It has been shown that baseflow to the river has an inverse relation with rainfall, which indicates that higher rainfall events relate to the low baseflow and lower rainfall will relate to the higher baseflow with a correlation coefficient of −0.74. The direct effect of climate change induced through precipitation indicates that the total run-off in the river is decreasing with time which causes stresses on groundwater.

Keywords

Climate change GW–SW interaction Rainfall Run-off Sea level rise 

References

  1. AFR (Annual Flood Report) (2014) Irrigation and waterways directorate. Government of West BengalGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates BC, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu S, Palutikof J (eds) (2008) Climate change and water technical paper of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Secretary, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  3. Bovolo CI, Parkin G, Sophocleous M (2009) Groundwater resources, climate and vulnerability. Environ Res Lett 4:035001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. C-DAP (2014) Comprehensive district agriculture plan for Nadia District, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  5. Cooper DJ, Wolf EC, Ronayne MJ, Roche JW (2015) Effects of groundwater pumping on the sustainability of a mountain wetland complex, vol 3. Yosemite National Park, California, pp 87–105Google Scholar
  6. Correll DL, Jordan TE, Weller DE (1992) Nutrient flux in a landscape: effects of coastal land use and terrestrial community mosaic on nutrient transport to coastal waters. Estuaries 15(4):431–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fetter CW (2000) Applied hydrogeology, 4th edn, pp 37–48Google Scholar
  8. Gurdak JJ, Hanson RT, Green TT (2009) Effects of climate variability and change on groundwater resources. U.S. Geological Survey, Fact sheet, Sept:3074Google Scholar
  9. Harte PT, Winter TC (1993) Factors affecting recharge to crystalline rock in the Mirror Lake area, Grafton County, New Hampshire, paper presented at USGS toxic substances hydrology program—Proceedings of the technical meeting. Colorado Springs, Colorado, 20–24 SeptGoogle Scholar
  10. IPCC (2007a) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. IPCC (2007b) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Kundzewicz ZW, Doll P (2009) Will groundwater ease freshwater stress under climate change? Hydrogeological Sci J 54(4):665–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ludwig F, van Slobbe E, Cofino W (2014) Climate change adaptation and integrated water resource management in the water sector. J Hydrol 518:235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller DC, Ullman WJ (2004) Ecological consequences of groundwater discharge to Delaware Bay, United States. Ground Water 42:959–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mukherjee A (2018) Groundwater of South Asia. Springer, Singapore. ISBN 978-981-10-3888-4Google Scholar
  16. Mukherjee A, Fryar AE, Rowe HD (2007) Regional-scale stable isotopic signatures of recharge and deep groundwater in the arsenic affected areas of West Bengal, India. 334:151–161Google Scholar
  17. Schewe J, Heinke J, Gerten D, Haddeland I, Arnell NW, Clark DB et al (2014) Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change. Proc Nat Acad Sci U.S.A. 111:3245–3250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smerdon B, Devito K, Mendoza C (2005) Interaction of groundwater and shallow lakes on outwash sediments in the sub-humid Boreal Plains of Canada. J Hydrol 314(1):246–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stark J, Armstrong D, Zwilling D (1994) Stream-aquifer interactions in the straight river area, Becker and Hubbard Counties, Minnesota, US Geological Survey. Water-resources investigations report: 94-4009Google Scholar
  20. Taylor RG et al (2013) Ground water and climate change. Nat Clim Change 3(4):322–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. USGS (2007) Climate variability and change. U.S. Geological Survey, Fact sheet 2007–3108Google Scholar
  22. Winter TC, Rosenberry DO (1995) The interaction of ground water with prairie pothole wetlands in the Cottonwood Lake area, East-Central North Dakota, 1979–1990. Wetlands 15(3):193–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Syed Aaquib Hussain
    • 1
  • Kousik Das
    • 2
  • Soumendra Nath Bhanja
    • 1
  • Abhijit Mukherjee
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Geology and GeophysicsInstitute of Technology (IIT)—KharagpurKharagpurIndia
  2. 2.School of Environmental Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology (IIT)—KharagpurKharagpurIndia
  3. 3.Applied Policy Advisory to Hydrogeosciences GroupIndian Institute of Technology (IIT)—KharagpurKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations