Advertisement

Groundwater Chemistry and Arsenic Enrichment of the Ganges River Basin Aquifer Systems

  • Abhijit MukherjeeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Hydrogeology book series (SPRINGERHYDRO)

Abstract

The Ganges river basin aquifers provide one of the most prolific groundwater reservoirs of the South Asia, specifically northern India and Bangladesh. The thick aquifers serve as a perennial source for fresh, potable groundwater and stretch from the Himalayan foothills (of the north-central India) up to the Bay of Bengal (to the east), and are confined along the Himalayan foredeep between the Main Frontal Thrust (MFT) to the north and the cratonic outcrops to the south. The basin is underlain by a main shallow semi-confined (yet interconnected) aquifer system, hosting hydrochemically heterogeneous groundwater facies, along with the existence of deeper isolated aquifers. In the central Gangetic basin (CGB), the aquifers can be classified to be of Pre-Cenozoic (PC) lithology, piedmont deposit (PD), younger alluvial (YA), and older alluvium (OA). The lower Gangetic basin (LGB) is predominantly composed of YA and OA, which also forms the most extensive and prolific aquifers. Recharge of groundwater in these aquifers has taken place from meteoric inflow or partially evaporated surface water. However, in recent times, irrigational return flow also acts as major source of recharge. The groundwaters’ composition is predominated by recent-aged, Ca–HCO3 facies, with some aquifers hosting varied hydrochemical facies, ranging from Ca–Na–\({{\text{HCO}}_{3}}^{ - }\)–Cl to Na–\({{\text{HCO}}_{3}}^{ - }\) types, indicating hydrogeochemical evolution through longer water–rock interaction. While most of the solutes for the YA groundwater are derived from weathering of young, Himalayan carbonate dissolution, many of the PD, PC, and OA in CGB and LGB groundwater have evolved by silicate weathering of silicate-rich other lithotypes and temporally longer evolutionary processes. Groundwater redox ranges from oxic to methanic, with indefinite spatial and depth variance, and is dominated by metal-reducing conditions. The coexisting redox-sensitive solutes, e.g., As(III), Fe(II), NH3(dis), elevated HS indicate disequilibrium in an overall reducing, post-oxic condition, with overlapped redox zones. More than 75% of groundwater for the YA and PD, north of the 22.75° latitude, are found to have dissolved As ≥0.01 mg/L, with negligibly elevated concentrations recorded in the OA and PC groundwater. Dissolution/mobilization of arsenic can be caused by reduction of Fe(III), as a consequence of the coupled Fe–S redox cycles, and this mechanism is regarded as the dominant process of As release in the basin groundwater. However, processes like ion exchange or replacement, driven by competitive anions, introduced from active water–rock interactions, or from nutrients sourced from agricultural practices, can also act as potential triggers for As mobilization in groundwater.

References

  1. Acharyya SK, Shah BA (2004) Risk of arsenic contamination in groundwater affecting the Ganga Alluvial Plain, India. Environ Health Perspect 112(1):A19–A20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahamed S, Sengupta K, Mukherjee M, Hossain AM, Das B, Nayak B, Pal B, Mukherjee AC, Pati S, Dutta S (2006) Arsenic groundwater contamination and its health effects in the state of Uttar Pradesh (UP) in upper and middle Ganga plain, India: a severe danger. Sci Total Environ 338(3):189–200Google Scholar
  3. Baumler R, Zech W (1994) Soils of the high mountain region of Eastern Nepal: classification, distribution and soil forming processes. CATENA 22:85–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BGS/DPHE/MML (2001) Arsenic contamination of groundwater in Bangladesh. Technical Report WC/00/19, British Geological Survey, KeyworthGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhattacharya P, Mukherjee A, Mukherjee AB (2011) Arsenic contaminated groundwater of India. In: Nriagu J (ed) Encyclopedia of environmental health. Elsevier B.V., Netherlands, pp 150–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhattacharya P, Chatterjee D, Jacks G (1997) Occurrence of arsenic-contaminated groundwater in alluvial aquifers from the Bengal Delta Plain, Eastern India: options for a safe drinking water supply. Water Resour Dev 13:79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burbank DW (1992) Causes of recent Himalayan uplift deduced from deposited patterns in the Ganges basin. Nature 357:680–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CGWB/GWD (2007) Dynamic Groundwater Resources of Bihar State as on 31st March 2004. Central Groundwater Board, Government of India and Ground Water Investigation Directorate, Government of Bihar, PatnaGoogle Scholar
  9. Chakraborti D, Basu GK, Biswas BK, Chowdhury UK, Rahman MM, Paul K, Chowdhury TR, Chanda CR, Lodh D, Ray SL (2001) Characterization of arsenic-bearing sediments in the Gangetic delta of West Bengal, India. In: Chappell WR, Abernathy CO, Calderon RL (eds) Arsenic exposure and health effects IV. Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, pp 27–52Google Scholar
  10. Chakraborti D (2003) Arsenic poisoning suspected throughout Indo-Gangetic Plain. Trac-Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 22(4):III–IVGoogle Scholar
  11. Chakraborti D, Sengupta MK, Rahman MM, Ahamed S, Chowdhury UK, Mukherjee SC (2004) Groundwater arsenic contamination and its health effects in the Ganga-Meghna-Brahmaputra plain. J Environ Monit 6(6):74 N–83 NGoogle Scholar
  12. Chauhan VS, Nickson RT, Chauhan D, Iyenger L, Sankaramkrishanan N (2009) Ground water geochemistry of Ballia district, Uttar Pradesh, India and mechanisms of arsenic release. Chemosphere 75:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Derry LA, France-Lanord C (1996) Neogene Himalayan weathering history and river 87Sr/86Sr: impact on the marine Sr record. Earth Planet Sci Lett 142:59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dowling CB, Poreda RJ, Basu AR (2003) The groundwater geochemistry of the Bengal Basin: weathering, chemsorption, and trace metal flux to the oceans. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 67(12):2117–2136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galy A, France-Lanord C (1999) Weathering processes in the Ganges-Brahmaputra basin and the riverine alkalinity budget. Chem Geol 159:31–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garai R, Chakraborty AK, Dey SB, Saha KC (1984) Chronic arsenic poisoning from tube-well water. J Indian Med Assoc 82:32–35Google Scholar
  17. Ghosh A (2005) Arsenic hot spots detected in the State of Bihar (India) a serious health hazard for estimated human population of 5.5 Lakhs. In: International conference on environmental management, Hyderabad, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  18. Grout H (1995) Characterization physique, mineralogique, chimique et signification de la charge particulaire et colloýdale derivieres de la zone subtropicale. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Aix-Marseille, FranceGoogle Scholar
  19. Harvey CF, Swartz CH, Badruzzaman ABM, Keon-Blute N, Yu W, Ali MA, Jay J, Beckie R, Niedan V, Brabander D, Oates PM, Ashfaque KN, Islam S, Hemond HF, Ahmed MF (2002) Arsenic mobility and groundwater extraction in Bangladesh. Science 298:1602–1606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harvey CF, Swartz CH, Badruzzaman ABM, Keon-Blute N, Yu W, Ali MA, Jay J, Beckie R, Niedan V, Brabander D, Oates PM, Ashfaque KN, Islam S, Hemond HF, Ahmed MF (2005) Groundwater arsenic contamination on the Ganges Delta: biogeochemistry, hydrology, human perturbations, and human suffering on a large scale. External Geophysics, Clim Environ 337(1–2):285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Islam FS, Gault AG, Boothman C, Polya DA, Charnock JM, Chatterjee D, Lloyd JR (2004) Role of metal-reducing bacteria in arsenic release from Bengal delta sediments. Nature 430:68–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. JICA (2002) The study on the ground water development of deep aquifers for safe drinking water supply to arsenic affected areas in western Bangladesh. Draft final report, book 1–3. Japan International Cooperation Agency, Kokusai Kogyo Co. Ltd. and Mitsui Mineral Development Engineering Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Klump S, Kipfer R, Olaf AC, Harvey CF, Brennwald MS, Khandkar NA, Badruzzaman ABM, Hug S, Imboden DM (2006) Groundwater dynamics and arsenic mobilization in Bangladesh assessed using noble gases and tritium. Environ Sci Technol 40:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumar K, Ramanathan A, Rao MS, Kumar B (2006) Identification and evaluation of hydrogeochemical processes in the groundwater environment of Delhi, India. Environ Geol 50:1025–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lowers HA, Breit GN, Foster AL, Whitney J, Yount J, Uddin MN, Muneem AA (2007) Arsenic incorporation into authigenic pyrite, Bengal Basin sediment, Bangladesh. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:2699–2717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McArthur JM, Banerjee DM, Hudson-Edwards KA, Mishra R, Purohit R, Ravenscroft P, Cronin A, Howarth RJ, Chatterjee A, Talukder T, Lowry D, Houghton S, Chadha D (2004) Natural organic matter in sedimentary basins and its relation to arsenic in anoxic groundwater: the example of West Bengal and its worldwide implications. Appl Geochem 19:1255–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mukherjee A, Fryar AE (2008) Deeper groundwater chemistry and geochemical modeling of the arsenic affected western Bengal basin, West Bengal, India. Appl Geochem 23:863–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mukherjee A, Fryar AE, Howell P (2007a) Regional hydrostratigraphy and groundwater flow modeling of the arsenic contaminated aquifers of the western Bengal basin, West Bengal, India. Hydrogeol J 15:1397–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mukherjee A, Fryar AE, Rowe HD (2007b) Regional scale stable isotopic signature and recharge of the deep water of the arsenic affected areas of West Bengal, India. J Hydrol 334:151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mukherjee A, Scanlon BR, Chaudhary S, Misra R, Ghosh A, Fryar AE, Ramanathan AL (2007c) Regional hydrogeochemical study of groundwater arsenic contamination along transects from the Himalayan alluvial deposits to the Indian shield, Central Gangetic Basin, India. Geol Soc Am Abstracts Programs 39(6):519Google Scholar
  31. Mukherjee A, Bhattacharya P, Savage K, Foster A, Bundschuh J (2008a) Distribution of geogenic arsenic in hydrologic systems: controls and challenges. J Contam Hydrol 99:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mukherjee A, von Brömssen M, Scanlon BR, Bhattacharya P, Fryar AE, Hasan MA, Ahmed KM, Jacks G, Chatterjee D, Sracek O (2008b) Hydrogeochemical comparison and effects of overlapping redox zones on groundwater arsenic near the western (Bhagirathi sub-basin, India) and eastern (Meghna sub-basin, Bangladesh) of the Bengal basin. J Contam Hydrol 99:31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mukherjee A, Fryar AE, O’Shea BM (2009a) Major occurrences of elevated arsenic in groundwater and other natural waters. In: Henke KR (ed) Arsenic—environmental chemistry, health threats and waste treatment. Wiley, Chichester, U.K., pp 303–350Google Scholar
  34. Mukherjee A, Bhattacharya P, Shi F, Fryar AE, Mukherjee AB, Xie ZM, Sracek O, Jacks G, Bundschuh J (2009b) Chemical evolution in high arsenic groundwater in Huhhot basin, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China and its difference from Western Bengal basin, India. Appl Geochem 24:1835–1851Google Scholar
  35. Mukherjee A, Scanlon BR, Fryar AE, Saha D, Ghosh A, Chowdhuri S, Mishra R (2012) Solute chemistry and arsenic fate in aquifers between the Himalayan foothills and Indian craton (including central Gangetic plain). Influence Geol Geomorphology 90:283–302Google Scholar
  36. Mukherjee A (2018) Groundwater of South Asia. Springer Nature, Singapore, ISBN 978-981-10-3888-4Google Scholar
  37. Michael HA, Voss CI (2008) Evaluation of the sustainability of deep groundwater as arsenic-safe resources in the Bengal Basin. PNAS 105:8531–8536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Michael HA, Voss CI (2009a) Estimation of regional-scale groundwater flow properties in the Bengal Basin of India and Bangladesh. Hydrogeol J 17:1329–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Michael HA, Voss CI (2009b) Control on groundwater flow in the Bengal Basin of India and Bangladesh: regional modeling analysis. Hydrogeol J.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-008-0429-4
  40. Mukherjee A, Fryar AE, Scanlon BR, Bhattacharya P, Bhattacharya A (2011) Elevated arsenic in deeper groundwater of western Bengal basin, India: extents and controls from regional to local-scale. Appl Geochem 26:600–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramanathan A, Bhattacharya P, Tripathi P (2006) Arsenic in groundwater of the aquifers of the central Gangetic plain of Uttar Pradesh, India. Geol Soc Am Program Abstracts 38(7):241Google Scholar
  42. Ravenscroft P, McArthur JM, Hoque B (2001) Geochemical and palaeohydrological controls on pollution of groundwater by arsenic. In: Chappell WR, Abernathy CO, Calderon RL (eds) Arsenic exposure and health effects IV. Elsevier Science, Oxford, pp 53–77Google Scholar
  43. Saha D, Dhar YR, Sikdar PK (2008) Geochemical evolution of groundwater in the Pleistocene aquifers of South Ganga Plain Bihar. J Geol Soc India 71:473–482Google Scholar
  44. Saha D, Sarangam SS, Dwivedi SN, Bhartariya KG (2010) Evaluation of hydrogeochemical processes in arsenic-contaminated alluvial aquifers in parts of Mid-Ganga Basin, Bihar, Eastern India. Environ Earth Sci 61:799–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Saha D, Sinha UK, Dwivedi SN (2011) Characterization of recharge processes in shallow and deeper aquifers using isotopic signatures and geochemical behavior of groundwater in an arsenic-enriched part of the Ganga Plain. Appl Geochem 26:432–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith AH, Lingas EO, Rahman M (2000) Contamination of drinking water by arsenic in Bangladesh: a public health emergency. Bull. World Health Org. 78(9):1093–1103Google Scholar
  47. Stüben D, Berner Z, Chandrasekharam D, Karmakar J (2003) Arsenic enrichment in groundwater of West Bengal, India: geochemical evidence for mobilization of As under reducing conditions. Appl Geochem 18(9):1417–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. van Geen A, Ahmed KM, Seddique AA, Shamsudduha M (2003) Community wells to mitigate the arsenic crisis in Bangladesh. Bull WHO 81:632–638Google Scholar
  49. van Geen A, Rose J, Thoral S, Garnier JM, Zheng Y, Bottero JY (2004) Decoupling of As and Fe release to Bangladesh groundwater under reducing conditions. Part II: evidence from sediment incubations. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68:3475–3486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van Geen A, Radloff K, Aziz Z, Cheng Z, Huq MR, Ahmed KM, Weinmann B, Goodbred S, Jung HB, Zheng Y, Berg M, Trang PTK, Charlet L, Metral J, Tisserand D, Gulliot S, Chakraborty S, Gajurel AP, Upreti BN (2008) Comparison of arsenic concentrations in simultaneously-collected groundwater and aquifer particles from Bangladesh, India, Vietnam, and Nepal. Appl Geochem 23:3244–3325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zheng Y, Stute M, van Geen A, Gavrieli I, Dhar R, Simpson HJ, Schlosser P, Ahmed KM (2004) Redox control of arsenic mobilization in Bangladesh groundwater. Appl Geochem 19:201–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zheng Y, van Geen A, Stute M, Dhar R, Mo Z, Cheng Z, Horneman A, Gavrieli A, Simpson HJ, Versteeg R, Steckler M, Grazioli-Venier A, Goodbred S, Shanewaz M, Shamsudduha M, Hoque M, Ahmed KM (2005) Geochemical and hydrogeological contrasts between shallow and deeper aquifers in two villages of Araihazar, Bangladesh: Implications for deeper aquifers as drinking water sources. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69:5203–5218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geology and GeophysicsIndian Institute of Technology (IIT)—KharagpurKharagpurIndia
  2. 2.School of Environmental Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology (IIT)—KharagpurKharagpurIndia
  3. 3.Applied Policy Advisory to Hydrogeosciences GroupIndian Institute of Technology (IIT)—KharagpurKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations