Advertisement

(De)Constructing Student E-Portfolios in Five Questions: Experiences from a Community of Practice

  • Tushar ChaudhuriEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The primary purpose of this lead article in the present volume is to provide the backdrop to the chapters included in the volume and to re-construct the framework, which formed the basis of the work of a Community of Practice (CoP) at the Hong Kong Baptist University (HKBU). The CoP looked into the question of how to develop a model for teachers from different disciplines to introduce e-portfolios as an assessment tool into their courses. It finally came up with a criterion-based model (Appendix A) and a suggestion for an assessment rubric (Appendix B) using an inductive method, where members first designed and implemented e-portfolios for their individual courses and brought back these experiences to the discussion table. The paper will discuss the development of this criterion-based model, which is meant to act as a starting point for practitioners and help them to provide their students with a clear set of outcomes for their respective portfolios. At the same time the criteria laid down in the model and the accompanying assessment rubric provide a scaffolding to the practitioners’ existing ideas on the e-portfolios that they would like to have their students create. The criteria are based on a set of key questions that teachers should ask and answer before embarking on the e-portfolio experiment.

Keywords

E-portfolios Assessment Community of practice Outcomes-based teaching and learning Graduate attributes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank all my CoP members past and present on behalf of whom I am writing this article: Dr. Béatrice Cabau, Ms Céline Dias, Ms Chi-Shan Chui, Ms Chan Wai Yin, Prof. Atara Sivan, Prof. Cheung Siu Yin, Dr. Catherine Ladds, Dr. Simon To, Dr. Lisa Deng, Dr. Warren Linger, Dr. Eva Wong, Mr Chris Chan, Dr. Paula Hodgson and Dr. Ronnie Shroff.

References

  1. Abrami, P. C., & Barrett, H. (2005). Directions for research and development on electronic portfolios. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3), 1–15.Google Scholar
  2. Ayala, J. I. (2006). Electronic portfolios for whom? Educause Quarterly, 29(1), 12–13.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, H. C. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The reflect initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436–449. Wiley on behalf of the International Literacy Association Stable. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40015496. Accessed on January 24, 2017.
  4. Bhattacharya, M., & Hartnett, M. (2007). E-portfolio assessment in higher education. In 37th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference. Milwaukee WI.Google Scholar
  5. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cambridge, D. (2010). Eportfolios for lifelong learning and assessment. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deneen, C. C., & Brown, G. T. L. (2014). A critical approach to E-Portfolios in higher education: How research may inform change and adoption. In 40th Annual Conference of International Association for Educational Assessment. Singapore.Google Scholar
  9. George, L., & Ittelson, J. (2005). An overview of E-Portfolios. In Educause Learning Initiative Paper 1, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
  10. Gnanam, A. (2000). Core competency and higher education. SAJHE/SATHO, 14(2), 147–151.Google Scholar
  11. Hernon, P., & Schwartz, C. (2006). Applying student learning outcomes to an educational programme. In P. Hernon, R. E. Dugan, & C. Schwartz (Eds.), Revisiting outcomes assessment in higher education (pp. 181–198). Westport, Conn: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, R. S., Mims-Cox, S. J., & Doyle-Nichols, A. (2010). Developing portfolios in education. A guide to reflection, inquiry and assessment. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Kennedy, K. J. (2011). Conceptualising quality improvement in higher education: Policy, theory and practice for outcomes based learning in Hong Kong. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(3), 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lorenzo, G., Ittelson, J., (2005a). Demonstrating and assessing student learning with E-Portfolios. In Educause Learning Initiative Paper 3, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  15. Lozano, J. F., Boni, A., Peris, J., Hueso, A. (2012). Competencies in higher education. A critical analysis from the capabilities approach. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46(1), 132–147.Google Scholar
  16. Oakley, G., Pegrum, M., & Johnston, S. (2013). Introducing e-portfolios to pre-service teachers as tools for reflection and growth: Lessons learnt. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. doi: 10.1080/1359866X.2013.854860
  17. Paulson, F. L., & Paulson, P. R. (1994). Assessing portfolios using the constructivist paradigm. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  18. Paulson, F. L., Paulson, P. R., & Meyer, C. A. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48(5), 60–63.Google Scholar
  19. Pelliccione, L., & Dixon, K. (2008). EPortfolios: Beyond assessment to empowerment in the learning landscape. In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? In Proceedings from ascilite Melbourne 2008.Google Scholar
  20. Shroff, R. H., Deneen, C. C., & Ng, E. M. W. (2011). Analysis of technology acceptance model in examining students’ behavioural intention to use an e-portfolio. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 600–618.Google Scholar
  21. Shroff, R. H., Trent, J., & Ng, E. M. W. (2013). Using e-portfolios in a field experience placement: Examining student-teachers’ attitudes towards learning in relationship to personal value, control and responsibility. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 143–160.Google Scholar
  22. Tushar, C., & Yin, C. W. (2016). Networked learning communities: A perspective arising from a multidisciplinary community of practice on student eportfolios. Learning Communities Journal, 8(2).Google Scholar
  23. University Grants Committee, Hong Kong. (2011). Annual Report 2010–2011. Retrieved from http://www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/ugc/publication/report/figure2010/m001.htm. Accessed on September 24, 2016.
  24. Zubizarreta, J. (2009). The learning portfolio: Reflective practice for improving student learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hong Kong Baptist UniversityKowloon TongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations