Advertisement

Moving Words to Move the Mountain: How Yan Fu Translated for the Purpose of Changing China

  • Yong ZhongEmail author
Chapter
Part of the New Frontiers in Translation Studies book series (NFTS)

Abstract

This article presents an investigation into how Yan Fu, reputed as the father of the Chinese translation profession, translated for the purpose of moving a seemingly indomitable mountain, which is a metaphor for the Chinese Qing Empire. The empire was metaphorically referred to as the Mountain in this article as it was known for enduring resistance to change and to the outside world as well as for ruthless repression of its subjects. By adopting a set of research methods mainly comprising textual analysis, this article examines an extract from Yan Fu’s Chinese rendition of Huxley’s Evolution and Ethics and Other Essays, to be followed by a reverse reconstruction of Yan Fu’s translation procedure. The textual analysis identified major systematic discrepancies in terms of message, function and vision between Yan Fu’s translation and Huxley’s text. This indicates that Yan Fu’s practice cannot be explained with “fidelity”, one of the three translation criteria invented by him, in its existing interpretation and is only justifiable in a post-functional plan-based paradigm. This case study will shed light on the tradition of Chinese translation, on how translation is conducted in real-life situations, on how translation can be geared in an activist manner to drive social changes and on how theory and practice can be reconciled.

Keywords

Textual Analysis Qing Dynasty Source Text Chinese Translation Factual Distortion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baker, Mona. 2006a. Translation and activism: Emerging patterns of narrative community. The Massachusetts Review 3: 462–484.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, Mona. 2006b. Translation and conflict: A narrative account. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bauman, Richard. 2000. Genre. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 1–2: 84–87.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, John, et al. 1972. Ways of seeing. London: British Broadcasting Corporation and Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  5. Berry-Flint, Sarah. 1999. Genre. In A companion to film theory, ed. Toby Miller, and Robert Stam, 25–44. MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  6. Cai, Yuanpei. 1923/1984. 五十年来中国之哲学 (Fifty years of Chinese philosophy), vol. 4. Shanghai: Zhonghua Book Company.Google Scholar
  7. Chao, Yuen Ren. 1969. Dimensions of fidelity in translation with special reference to Chinese. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 29: 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Devitt, Amy J. 2004. Writing genres. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fairbank, John King. 1986. The great Chinese revolution, 1800–1985. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  10. Fang, Huawen. 2005. 二十世纪中国翻译史 (The translation history of China in the 20th Century). Xi’an: Northwest University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fu, Sinian. 1919. 汉语改用拼音文字之初步谈 (Preliminary discussion of Romanization of Chinese). New Tide 3: 532–539.Google Scholar
  12. Fuery, Patrick, and Kelli Fuery. 2003. Visual cultures and critical theory. London: Hodder Arnold Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Halliday, Michael, and Christian Mathiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd ed. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
  14. Holz-Manttari, Justa. 1984. Translatorisches handeln: Theorie und methode. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.Google Scholar
  15. Hung, Ho-Fung. 2016. From Qing Empire to the Chinese nation: An incomplete project. Nations and Nationalism 4: 660–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huxley, Thomas. 1894/2001. Prolegomena. In Evolution and ethics and other Essays, Online Project Gutenberg downloaded from World Wide Web from http://www.wikipremed.com/reading/philosophy/Evolution_and_Ethics.pdf: 46–116. Accessed 30 Oct 2016.
  17. Jia, Fenran. 2005. 六朝文体批评研究 (A critical study of the stylistics of six ancient Chinese dynasties). Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Levý, Jirí. 2000. Translation as a decision process. In The translation studies reader, ed. Lawrence Venuti, 148–159. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Liang, Qichao. 1902/1990. 绍介新著原富 (Introducing The wealth of nations). In 严复研究资料 (Study and literature of Yan Fu), ed. Niu Yangshan and Sun Hongmi, 266–268. Fuzhou: The Straits Publishing and Distributing Group.Google Scholar
  20. Lu, Xun. 1928/1991. 朝花夕拾 • 琐记 (Morning flowers picked at dusk), Vol. 2/16 of Complete collections of Lu Xun’s works. Beijing: People’s Literature Publishing House.Google Scholar
  21. Newmark, Peter. 1988. Approaches to translation. New York and London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Nida, Eugene. 2000. Principles of correspondence. In The translation studies reader, ed. Lawrence Venuti, 126–141. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Pare, Anthony. 2002. Genre and identity. In The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change, ed. Richard M. Coe, Lorelei Lingard, and Tatiana Teslenko, 155–170. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  24. Reiss, Katharina. 1976. Texttypen, übersetzungstypen und die beurteilung von übersetzungen. Lebende sprachen 3: 97–100.Google Scholar
  25. Reiss, Katharina. 1989. Text types, translation types and translation assessment. In Readings in translation theory, ed. Andrew Chesterman, 105–115. Helsinki: Finn Lectura.Google Scholar
  26. Roy, Cynthia. B. 2002. The problem with definitions, descriptions, and the role metaphors of interpreters. In Interpreting studies reader, ed. Frans Pochhacker and Miriam Shlesinger, 345–353. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Song, Qilin, et al. 2010. 进化论与伦理学 (Evolutions and ethics). Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1992. The politics of translation. In Destabilizing theory, ed. Michele Barrett, and Anne Phillips, 177–200. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  29. Sullivan, Ceri. 2007. Disposable elements? Indications of genre in early modern titles. Modern Language Review 102 (3): 641–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tymoczko, Maria (ed.). 2010. Translation, resistance, activism. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  31. Venuti, Lawrence. 1995. The translator’s invisibility: A history of translation. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Von Kowallis, Jon. 1996. The lyrical Lu Xun: A study of his classical-style verse. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  33. Wang, Binbin. 1998. 隔在中西之间的日本 ——现代汉语中的日语“外来语”问题 (Japan between China and the West: On the issue of Japanese loans in contemporary Chinese). Shanghai literature. http://bbs.tianya.cn/post-free-2803832-1.shtml. Accessed 30 Oct 2016.
  34. Wang, Shi (ed.) 1986. 严复集 (Yan Fu’s complete works), vol. 3/5. Beijing, Zhonghua Book Company.Google Scholar
  35. Wang, Wenjun, Lin, Yi and Zhu, Jubo. 2011. Interest models and applications in analyzing the rise and decline of Qing dynasty. Kybernetes 40(9/10): 1486–1502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03684921111169503.
  36. Wong, Wang-chi. 1999. Wenyan or baihua: On the issue of translation language since the Late Qing. Journal of Translation Studies 3: 49–80.Google Scholar
  37. Wong, Young-tsu. 1994. 严复的翻译 (On Yan Fu’s translation). Chinese Culture 9: 117–123.Google Scholar
  38. Wong, Young-tsu. 2006. 重读严复的翻译 (Re-reading Yan Fu’s translation). Biographical Literature 524: 4–24.Google Scholar
  39. Yan, Fu. 1898/1981. 天演论 (Huxley’s Evolutions and ethics in Chinese). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
  40. Yu, Zheng. 2003. 严复著译研究 (A study of Yan Fu’s translation). Suzhou: Suzhou University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Zhong, Shukong. 1980. A Handbook of Translation. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
  42. Zhong, Yong. 2005. Plan-based translation assessment: An alternative to the standard-based cut-the-feet-to-fit-the-shoes style of assessment. Meta 4: unpaginated.Google Scholar
  43. Zhong, Yong. 2006. Assessing translators vs assessing translations: Discussions and a case demonstration. Translation Ireland 1 (Special Issue: new Vistas in translator and interpreter Training): 151–70.Google Scholar
  44. Zhong, Yong. 2011. The making of a “correct” translation: Showcasing the official Chinese discourse of translation. Meta 4: 796–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhong, Yong. 2014. Theories-guided translation practices and outcome evaluation. Chinese Translators Journal 1: 102–108.Google Scholar
  46. Zhong, Yong. 2016a. Translating live to generate new knowledge. Translation Spaces 1: 38–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhong, Yong. 2016b. Becoming equivalent. Culture and Dialogues 4: 317–337. doi: 10.1163/24683949-12340018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhou, Zhenhuan. 1996. 影响中国近代社会的一百种译作 (One hundred translations that changed recent Chinese society). Beijing: China Foreign Translation Publishing House.Google Scholar
  49. Zhu, Lingyuan. 2015. Interaction between translators’ activities and target socio-cultural context: A case study of translation in late Qing Dynasty. Studies in Literature and Language 4: 100–108.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations