Biofuels pp 137-155 | Cite as

Thermo-Chemical Ethanol Production from Agricultural Waste Through Polygeneration: Performance Assessment Through a Case Study

  • Kuntal Jana
  • Sudipta DeEmail author
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)


Substitution of fossil fuels by biofuels over a planned period is an imperative need to meet the energy demand in future with minimum possible environmental impact. Biofuels from food stuff may lead to conflict between energy and food security. However, producing biofuel (say, ethanol) from agricultural waste (say, rice straw) in thermo-chemical process may be a sustainable option through recycling of waste. But energy requirement for this process is significantly higher and independent production of ethanol may not be economically feasible. However, suitable integration of this ethanol production through an efficiently integrated multi-utility system called polygeneration may be economically feasible with low impact on the environment. This has been explored through a case study with thermodynamic, economic and environmental performance assessment. Results show sustainability of such a process with acceptable performance from multidimensional viewpoints.


Ethanol Production Rice Straw Carbon Capture Life Cycle Analysis Sustainable Option 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Mr. Kuntal Jana gratefully acknowledges to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India for awarding Senior Research Fellowship during this work toward Ph.D.


  1. 1.
    IEA (2015) World energy outlook. International Energy Agency, ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    IPCC (2015) Climate change 2014, Synthesis Report (AR5). Cambridge University Press, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tester JW, Drake EM, Driscoll MJ, Golay MW, Peters WA (2012) Sustainable energy: choosing among options. MIT press, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Freitas LC, Kaneko S (2011) Ethanol demand in Brazil: regional approach. Energy Policy 39:2289–2298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hira A (2011) Sugar rush: prospects for a global ethanol market. Energy Policy 39:6925–6935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kalyani KA, Pandey KK (2014) Waste to energy status in India: a short review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 31:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meerman JC, Ramirez A, Turkenburg WC, Faaij APC (2011) Performance of simulated flexible integrated gasification polygeneration facilities. part A: technical energetic assessment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:2563–2587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    TIFAC (2009) Availability of Indian biomass resources for exploitation. Accessed 17 Oct 2016
  9. 9.
    Higman C, Burgt MVD (2008) Gasification. Elsevier, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van der Heijden H, Ptasinski KJ (2012) Exergy analysis of thermochemical ethanol production via biomass gasification and catalytic synthesis. Energy 46:200–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Perales ALV, Valle CR, Ollero P, Gomez-Bare A (2011) Technoeconomic assessment of ethanol production via thermochemical conversion of biomass by entrained flow gasification. Energy 36:4097–4108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jana K, De S (2015) Sustainable polygeneration design and assessment through combined thermodynamic, economic and environmental analysis. Energy 91:540–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chicco G, Mancarella P (2009) Distributed multi-generation: a comprehensive view. Renew Sust Energy Rev 13(3):535–551Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jana K, De S (2015) Polygeneration performance assessments: multi-dimensional viewpoint. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:1547–1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    CGPL (2010) Biomass resource atlas of India. Combustion, gasification and propulsion laboratory, IISc Bangalore, India. Accessed 05 May 2014
  16. 16.
    Jana K, De S (2015) Techno-economic evaluation of a polygeneration—a case study for an Indian district. Bioresour Technol 181:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: working group I: the physical science basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jana K, De S (2015) Polygeneration using agricultural waste: thermodynamic and economic feasibility study. Renew Energy 74:648–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jana K, De S (2016) Environmental impact of an agro-waste based polygeneration without and with CO2 storage: life cycle assessment approach. Bioresour Technol 216:931–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations