Skip to main content

Lean Blowout (LBO) Prediction Through Symbolic Time Series Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Combustion for Power Generation and Transportation

Abstract

Lean combustion is preferred in combustors for cleaner emission. But, the major problem in running the combustor in lean condition is the flame blow-out, due to lower burning velocity in lean condition. To sustain lean combustion, early prediction of lean blowout (LBO) is needed. This need calls for developing new strategies to predict LBO. This work is on development of strategies based on symbolic analysis of time series data obtained from the combustor. Optical signal (CH* chemiluminescence) based time series data has been captured from a laboratory scale dump combustor. Gaseous fuel has been used at different premixing regimes to run the combustor. The time series data obtained are partitioned to different cells to get symbol strings and subsequently generate a probabilistic finite state automata (PFSA). The constructed PFSA is called D-Markov machines. These machines have a deterministic algebraic structure and the states are represented by symbol blocks of length D or less, where D is a positive integer. The estimated state probability vector is found out on the basis of number of occurrence of each symbol over a time duration. A reference state vector is calculated at a condition that is sufficiently away from the state of LBO. For a given state, the deviation of the state vector from the reference vector can be computed and used as an anomaly measure for early detection of LBO. The problem of LBO prediction is posed in a pattern classification setting and the underlying algorithms have been tested on experimental data at different extents of fuel-air premixing and fuel/air ratio. It is found that, over a wide range of fuel-air premixing, performance of D-Markov machines, as LBO predictors, is better with D > 1 than those with D = 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chaudhari RR (2011) Investigation of thermoacoustic instabilities and lean blowout in a model gas turbine combustor. PhD thesis, Jadavpur University, India

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chaudhari RR, Sahu R, Ghosh S, Mukhopadhyay A, Sen S (2013) Flame color as a lean blowout predictor. Int J Spray Combust Dyn 5:49–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaudhuri S, Cetegen BM (2008) Blowoff characteristics of bluff body stabilized conical premixed flames under upstream mixture gradients and velocity oscillations. Combust Flame 153:616–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chaudhuri S, Cetegen BM (2009) Blowoff characteristics of bluff body stabilized conical premixed flames in a duct with upstream mixture gradients and velocity oscillations. Combust Sci Technol 181:555–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaudhuri S, Kostska S, Renfro MW, Cetegen BM (2010) Blowoff dynamics of bluff body stabilized turbulent premixed flames. Combust Flame 157:790–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Darema F (2005) Dynamic data driven applications systems: new capabilities for application simulations and measurements. In: 5th international conference on computational science, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daw C, Kennel M, Finney C, Connolly F (1998) Observing and modeling nonlinear dynamics in an internal combustion engine. Phys Rev E 57(2811):2819

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dupont P, Denis F, Esposito Y (2005) Links between probabilistic automata and hidden markov models: probability distributions. Learn Models Ind Algorithms Pattern Recogn 38:1349–1371

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lieuwen TC, Yang V (2005) Combustion instabilities in gas turbine engines. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lind D, Marcus B (1995) Symbolic dynamics and coding. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Meier W, Weigand P, Duan XR, Giezendanner-Thobben R (2007) Detailed characterization of the dynamics of thermoacoustic pulsations in a lean premixed swirl flame. Combust Flame 150:2–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mukherjee K, Ray A (2014) State splitting and state merging in probabilistic finite state automata for signal representation and analysis. Sig Process 104:105–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mukhopadhyay A, Chaudhari RR, Paul T, Sen S, Ray A (2013) Prediction of lean blow-out in gas turbine combustors using symbolic time series analysis. J Propul Power 29:950–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Muruganandam TM, Nair S, Neumeier Y, Lieuwen T, Seitzman J (2002) Optical and acoustic sensing of lean blowout precursors. In 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Indianapolis, Indiana

    Google Scholar 

  15. Muruganandam TM, Kim B, Olsen R, Patel M, Romig B, Seitzman JM (2003) Chemiluminescence based sensors for turbine engines. In: 39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, Huntsville, Alabama

    Google Scholar 

  16. Muruganandam TM, Seitzman JM (2005) Characterization of extinction events near blowout in swirl-dump combustors. In: 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Tucson, Arizona

    Google Scholar 

  17. Muruganandam TM, Nair S, Scarborough D, Neumeier Y, Jagoda J, Lieuwen T, Seitzman J, Zinn B (2005) Active control of lean blowout for turbine engine combustors. J Propul Power 21:807–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nair S, Muruganandam TM, Olsen R, Meyers A, Seitzman J, Zinn BT, Lieuwen T, Held T, Mongia H (2004) Lean blowout detection in a single nozzle swirl cup combustor. In: 42nd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, USA

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nair S, Lieuwen T (2005) Acoustic detection of blowout in premixed flames. J Propul Power 21:32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Prakash S, Nair S, Muruganandam TM, Neumeier Y, Lieuwen T, Seitzman JM, Zinn BT (2005) Acoustic based rapid blowout mitigation in a swirl stabilized combustor. In: ASME turbo expo, Reno, USA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ray A (2004) Symbolic dynamic analysis of complex systems for anomaly detection. Sig Process 84:1115–1130

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Sarkar S, Ray A, Mukhopadhyay A, Chaudhari RR, Sen S (2014) Early detection of lean blow out (LBO) via generalized D-Markov machine construction. In: American control conference, Portland, Oregon, USA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sarkar S, Ray A, Mukhopadhyay A, Sen S (2015) Dynamic data driven prediction of lean blowout in a swirl stabilized combustor. Int J Spray Combust Dyn 7:209–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sen S, Chaudhari RR, Mukhopadhyay A (2014) Lean blowout detection in partially premixed flames in a swirl-stabilized dump combustor. In: Agarwal K, Pandey A, Gupta AK, Aggarwal SK, Kushari A, (eds) Novel combustion concepts for sustainable energy development (A). Springer. ISBN: 978-81-322-2210-1

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stohr M, Boxx I, Carter C, Meier W (2011) Dynamics of lean blowout of a swirl stabilized flame in a gas turbine model combustor. Proc Combust Inst 33:2953–2960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vidal E, Thollard F, de la Higuera C, Casacuberta F, Carrasco R (2005) Probabilistic finite-state machines—part I and part II. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 27:1013–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Williams TC, Schefer RW, Oefelein JC, Shaddix CR (2007) Idealized gas turbine combustor for performance research and validation of large eddy simulations. Rev Sci Instr 78: 035114-1–035144-9

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yi T, Gutmark EJ (2007) Real-time prediction of incipient lean blowout in gas turbine combustors. AIAA J 45:1734–1739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zilwa SD, Uhm JH, Whitelaw JH (2000) Combustion oscillations close to the lean flammability limit. Combust Sci Technol 160:231–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sen, S., Sarkar, S., Chaudhari, R.R., Mukhopadhyay, A., Ray, A. (2017). Lean Blowout (LBO) Prediction Through Symbolic Time Series Analysis. In: Agarwal, A., De, S., Pandey, A., Singh, A. (eds) Combustion for Power Generation and Transportation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3785-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3785-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3784-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3785-6

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics