Skip to main content

Development of an Indigenous Sensor for Sub-micron Aerosol Monitoring in India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Combustion for Power Generation and Transportation
  • 1155 Accesses

Abstract

Environmental pollutants might be present in different media as well as they can easily migrate between air, water and soil. These contaminants can migrate from one media to another. Many epidemiological studies have linked particulate matter (PM) and especially the PM2.5 (aerodynamic diameter dp < 2.5 µm) mass to adverse cardiovascular and respiratory health effects. These health effects include premature mortality, asthma exacerbation, decreased lung function, and increased risk of myocardial infarction among others. These tiny inhalable particles are composed of various heterogeneously mixed chemical species including sulfate, nitrate, ammonium ions, sea salt, organic and elemental carbon, metals, and biological material. Past studies have suggested that specific toxic components like heavy metals, PAHs or biological components like endotoxins are responsible for irregular heart and lung function in animal models. Accurate measurement of contaminants in various media is the first step towards their effective control. This chapter describes the lab development and field evaluation of an inertial impaction based indigenous sensor for sub-micron aerosol monitoring developed at IIT Kanpur. Submicron particles (PM1) were collected during the winter season at Kanpur, India. These samples were chemically characterized for various species like As, Ca, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Pb, Se, Ti, V, Zn, F, Cl, NO3 , SO4 2− and NH4 +. These quantitative details were used to apportion air pollutant sources using Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) coupled with conditional probability function (CPF) to determine the likely direction of each source from receptor site. This low cost instrument is now commercially available in the Indian market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahmad MN et al (2012) Hydrogen fluoride damage to vegetation from peri-urban brick kilns in Asia: a growing but unrecognised problem? Environ Pollut 162:319–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashbaugh LL, Malm WC, Sadeh WZ (1985) A residence time probability analysis of sulfur concentrations at Grand Canyon National Park. Atmos Environ 19(0):1263–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atkinson RW, Anderson HR, Sunyer J, Ayres J, Baccini M, Vonk JM (2001) Acute effects of particulate air pollution on respiratory admissions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:1860–1866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bachmann JD, Damberg RJ, Caldwell JC, Edwards C, Koman PD (1996) Review of the national ambient air quality standards for particulate matter: policy assessment of scientific and technical information. OAQPS staff paper. Final report. Other Information: PBD: July 1996 (1996), p. Medium: P; Size: 421 p

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balachandran S, Meena BR, Khillare PS (2000) Particle size distribution and its elemental composition in the ambient air of Delhi. Environ Int 26:49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Banerjee T, Murari V, Kumar M, Raju MP (2015) Source apportionment of airborne particulates through receptor modelling: Indian scenario. Atmos Res. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.04.017

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bapna M, Sunder Raman R, Ramachandran S, Rajesh TA (2013) Airborne black carbon concentrations over an urban region in western India—temporal variability, effects of meteorology, and source regions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:1617–1631

    Google Scholar 

  8. Behera SN, Sharma M (2010) Reconstructing primary and secondary components of PM2.5 composition for an urban atmosphere. Aerosol Sci Technol 44:983–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brimblecombe P (1999) Air pollution and health history, pp 5–20

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buseck PR, Pósfai M (1999) Airborne minerals and related aerosol particles: effects on climate and the environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:3372–3379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Buzcu-Guven B, Brown SG, Frankel A, Hafner HR, Roberts PT (2007) Analysis and apportionment of organic carbon and fine particulate matter sources at multiple sites in the midwestern United States. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 57:606–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chakraborty A, Gupta T (2010) Chemical characterization and source apportionment of submicron (PM1) aerosol in Kanpur region, India. Aerosol Air Qual Res 10:433–445

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chandra Mouli P, Venkata Mohan S, Balaram V, Praveen Kumar M, Jayarama Reddy S (2006) A study on trace elemental composition of atmospheric aerosols at a semi-arid urban site using ICP-MS technique. Atmos Environ 40:136–146

    Google Scholar 

  14. Echalar F, Gaudichet A, Cachier H, Artaxo P (1995) Aerosol emissions by tropical forest and savanna biomass burning: characteristic trace elements and fluxes. Geophys Res Lett 22:3039–3042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. GIOVANNI-NASA, MERRA 3-hourly history data collections (3D). http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni

  16. Gupta T, Chakraborty A, Ujinwal K (2010) Development and performance evaluation of an indigenously developed air sampler designed to collect submicron aerosol. Ann Indian Natl Acad Eng (INAE) 3:189–193

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta T, Dubey S (2011) Field performance evaluation of a newly developed PM 2.5 sampler at IIT Kanpur. Sci Total Environ 409:3500–3507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gupta T, Mandariya A (2013) Sources of submicron aerosol during fog-dominated wintertime at Kanpur. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:5615–5629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hopke PK (2000) A guide to positive matrix factorization. Workshop on UNMIX and PMF as Applied to PM2, p 600

    Google Scholar 

  20. Huang S, Rahn KA, Arimoto R (1999) Testing and optimizing two factor-analysis techniques on aerosol at Narragansett, Rhode Island. Atmos Environ 33:2169–2185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hutton M (1983) Sources of cadmium in the environment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 7:9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones F, Bankiewicz D, Hupa M (2014) Occurrence and sources of zinc in fuels, Fuel 117(Part A):763–775

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kang CM, Gupta T, Ruiz PA, Wolfson JM, Ferguson ST, Lawrence J, Rohr AC, Goldleski J, Koutrakis P (2011) Aged particles derived from emissions of coal-fired power plants: the TERESA field results. Inhalation Toxicol 23:11–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Karar K, Gupta AK, Kumar A, Biswas A (2006) Characterization and identification of the sources of chromium, zinc, lead, cadmium, nickel, manganese and iron in PM10 particulates at the two sites of Kolkata, India. Environ Monit Assess 120:347–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaul D, Gupta T, Tripathi SN, Tare V, Collett J (2011) Secondary organic aerosol: a comparison between foggy and non-foggy days. Environ Sci Technol 45:7307–7313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khandekar RN, Kelkar DN, Vohra KG (1980) Lead, cadmium, zinc, copper and iron in the atmosphere of Greater Bombay. Atmos Environ 14(0):457–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim E, Hopke PK (2004) Comparison between conditional probability function and nonparametric regression for fine particle source directions. Atmos Environ 38:4667–4673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim E, Hopke PK, Edgerton ES (2003) Source identification of Atlanta aerosol by positive matrix factorization. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 53:731–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim ND, Fergusson JE (1994) The concentrations, distribution and sources of cadmium, copper, lead and zinc in the atmosphere of an urban environment. Sci Total Environ 144:179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Krishna RR (2012) Current atmospheric aerosol research in India. Curr Sci 102:440–457

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kulshrestha A, Satsangi PG, Masih J, Taneja A (2009) Metal concentration of PM2.5 and PM10 particles and seasonal variations in urban and rural environment of Agra, India. Sci Total Environ 407:6196–6204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee JH, Hopke PK (2006) Apportioning sources of PM 2.5 in St. Louis, MO using speciation trends network data. Atmos Environ 40:360–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lestari P, Mauliadi YD (2009) Source apportionment of particulate matter at urban mixed site in Indonesia using PMF. Atmos Environ 43:1760–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Li J, Pósfai M, Hobbs PV, Buseck PR (2003) Individual aerosol particles from biomass burning in southern Africa: 2. Compositions and aging of inorganic particles. J Geophys Res: Atmos 108:8484

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lin JJ, Lee L-C (2004) Characterization of the concentration and distribution of urban submicron (PM 1) aerosol particles. Atmos Environ 38:469–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mamane Y, Pirrone N (1998) Vanadium in the atmosphere. Adv Environ Sci Technol-New York 30:37–72

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mehta B, Venkataraman C, Bhushan M, Tripathi SN (2009) Identification of sources affecting fog formation using receptor modeling approaches and inventory estimates of sectoral emissions. Atmos Environ 43:1288–1295

    Google Scholar 

  38. Misra A, Gaur A, Bhattu D, Ghosh S, Dwivedi AK, Dalai R, Paul D, Gupta T, Tare V, Mishra SK (2014) An overview of the physico-chemical characteristics of dust at Kanpur in the central Indo-Gangetic basin. Atmos Environ 97:386–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Niranjan K, Sreekanth V, Madhavan B, Krishna Moorthy K (2007) Aerosol physical properties and Radiative forcing at the outflow region from the Indo‐Gangetic plains during typical clear and hazy periods of wintertime. Geophys Res Lett 34

    Google Scholar 

  40. Norris G, Vedantham R, Wade K, Brown S, Prouty J, Foley C (2008) EPA positive matrix factorization (PMF) 3.0 fundamentals and user guide. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nriagu JO, Pacyna JM (1988) Quantitative assessment of worldwide contamination of air, water and soils by trace metals. Nature 333:134–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Paatero P (1997) Least squares formulation of robust non-negative factor analysis. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 37:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Paatero P, Hopke PK (2003) Discarding or down weighting high-noise variables in factor analytic models. Anal Chim Acta 490:277–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Paatero P, Tapper U (1994) Positive matrix factorization: a non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values. Environmetrics 5:111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pant P, Harrison RM (2012) Critical review of receptor modelling for particulate matter: a case study of India. Atmos Environ 49:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Patil RS, Kumar R, Menon R, Shah MK, Sethi V (2013) Development of particulate matter speciation profiles for major sources in six cities in India. Atmos Res 132–133:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Polissar AV, Hopke PK, Paatero P, Malm WC, Sisler JF (1998) Atmospheric aerosol over Alaska: 2. Elemental composition and sources. J Geophys Res: Atmos (1984–2012) 103:19045–19057

    Google Scholar 

  48. Pope III C, Dockery D (1999) Epidemiology of particle effects. Air Pollut Health 31:673–705

    Google Scholar 

  49. Raman RS, Ramachandran S, Kedia S (2011) A methodology to estimate source-specific aerosol radiative forcing. J Aerosol Sci 42:305–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Reff A, Eberly SI, Bhave PV (2007) Receptor modeling of ambient particulate matter data using positive matrix factorization: review of existing methods. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 57:146–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sahu LK, Saxena P (2015) High time and mass resolved PTR-TOF-MS measurements of VOCs at an urban site of India during winter: role of anthropogenic, biomass burning, biogenic and photochemical sources. Atmos Res 164–165:84–94

    Google Scholar 

  52. Samet J, Dominici F, Zeger S, Schwartz J, Dockery D (2000) The national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study. Part I: Methods and methodologic issues. Res Rep Health Eff Inst 5

    Google Scholar 

  53. Samet JM et al (2000) The national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study. Part II: Morbidity and mortality from air pollution in the United States. Res Rep Health Eff Inst 94:5–79

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sanghi R, Sasi KS (2001) Pesticides and heavy metals in agricultural soil of Kanpur, India. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 67:0446–0454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Shen Z-X et al (2009) Chemical characteristics of submicron particles in winter in Xi’an. Aerosol Air Qual Res 9:80–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Srivastava AK, Pant P, Hegde P, Singh S, Dumka UC, Naja M, Singh N, Bhavanikumar Y (2011) The influence of a south Asian dust storm on aerosol radiative forcing at a high-altitude station in central Himalayas. Int J Remote Sens 32:7827–7845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Srivastava M, Tripathi SN, Bhattu D, Jaidevi JJ, Gupta T (2013) CCN closure results from Indian Continental Tropical Convergence Zone (CTCZ) aircraft experiment. Atmos Res 132–133:322–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Uno U, Ekpo B, Etuk V, Etuk H, Ibok U (2012) Comparative study of levels of trace metals in airborne particulates in some cities of the Niger delta region of Nigeria. Environ Pollut 2:p110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wen H, Carignan J (2007) Reviews on atmospheric selenium: emissions, speciation and fate. Atmos Environ 41:7151–7165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Xie R, Seip HM, Wibetoe G, Nori S, McLeod CW (2006) Heavy coal combustion as the dominant source of particulate pollution in Taiyuan, China, corroborated by high concentrations of arsenic and selenium in PM10. Sci Total Environ 370:409–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Xie ZM, Wu WH, Xu JM (2003) Study on fluoride emission from soils at high temperature related to brick-making process. Chemosphere 50:763–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Meteorological data used in this study were produced by the Giovanni online data system, developed and maintained by the NASA GES DISC (GIOVANNI-NASA). The work presented here was part of IITK M.Tech. EEM theses of my students Kamal Kant Ujinwal, Anil Mandariya and Nikhil Rastogi.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tarun Gupta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gupta, T. (2017). Development of an Indigenous Sensor for Sub-micron Aerosol Monitoring in India. In: Agarwal, A., De, S., Pandey, A., Singh, A. (eds) Combustion for Power Generation and Transportation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3785-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3785-6_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3784-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3785-6

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics