Advertisement

Forty Years of BioFETOLOGY: A Research Review

  • Jiten Chandra DuttaEmail author
  • Purnima Kumari Sharma
  • Hiranya Ranjan Thakur
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 553)

Abstract

The past 40 years since the introduction of enzyme field-effect transistor (ENFET) in 1976 has been invaluable towards the development of biological sensors. Many devices came up with its own merits and demerits which made this area of research very popular worldwide. When the biological materials such as living organisms, cells, enzymes, DNA, etc., were combined with ISFET, BioFETs came up. By detailed study of the BioFETs one finds that most of the devices were formed of Si-based ISFETs. Though these devices have many advantages but when it came to sub 22 nm range, scaling problems arose which led to power dissipation, leakage, short channel effects, etc. To overcome these problems researchers opted for the use of carbon nanotubes (CNT) as channel material which gave better scalability, reduced power dissipation, better control over channel formation, etc. The complex fabrication process of the traditional Si-based devices was also simplified by introduction of junctionless CNTFETs. This paper puts forward a study of advances and developments of various BioFETs starting with ENFET and continuing with junctionless CNTFET till date.

Keywords

ENFET BIOFET ISFET CNTFET 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Department of Electronics and Information Technology, MCIT, Government of India for the support through Visvesvaraya PhD scheme and Tezpur University for providing the laboratory facilities.

References

  1. 1.
    Clark, L. C., Lyons, C.: Electrode systems for continuous monitoring in cardiovascular surgery. Ann N Y Acad Sci., 102, 29–45 (1962).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bergveld, P.: Development of an ion-sensitive solid-state device for neurophysiological measurements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., BME–17(1), 70–71 (1970).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dutta, J. C.: Ion Sensitive Field Effect Transistor for Applications in Bioelectronic Sensors: A Research Review. In: National Conference on Computational Intelligence and Signal Processing (CISP), IEEE, pp. 185–191, India (2012).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bergveld, P.: Thirty years of ISFETOLOGY what happened in the past thirty years and what may happen in the next thirty years. Sensors and Actuators B, 88, 1–20 (2003).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bousse, L., Rooij, N.F., Bergveld, P.: Operation of Chemically sensitive field effect sensors as a function of the properties of the insulator/electrolyte interface. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 30, 1263–1270 (1983).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yates, D. E., Levine, S., Healy, T. W.: Site binding model of the electrical double layer at the oxide/water interface. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 70, 1807 – 1819 (1974).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schoning, M. J., Poghossian, A.: Recent advances in biologically sensitive field-effect transistors (BioFETs). Analyst, 127, 1137–1151 (2002).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Janata, J., Moss, S.: Chemically sensitive field effect transistors: Biomed. Eng., 6, 241–245 (1976).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Caras, S., Janata, J.: Field effect transistor sensitive to penicillin. Anal. Chem., 52, 1935–1937 (1980).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schenck, J. F.: Technical difficulties remaining to the application of ISFET devices. in Theory, Design and Biomedical Applications of Solid State Chemical Sensors, ed. P. W. Cheung, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 165–173 (1978).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schutz, S., et al.: Microscaled Living Bioelectronic Systems – Coupling Beetles to Silicon Transducers, Naturwissenschaften, 84, 86–88 (1997).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Romherz, P., et al.: A neuronsilicon junction: A retzius cell of the leech on insulated gate field effect transistor. Science, 252, 1290–1293(1991).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barik, M. A., et al.: Carbon Nanotube-Based Dual-Gated Junctionless Field-Effect Transistor for Acetylcholine Detection. IEEE Sensors Journal,16 (2), 280–286, (2016).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jobling, D. T., et al.: Active Microelectrode Array to record from The Mammalian Central Nervous System in Vitro. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 19, 553–560 (1981).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Souteyrand, E., et al.: Direct Detection of the Hybridization of Synthetic Homo-Oligomer DNA Sequences by Field Effect. J. Phys. Chem. B, 101, 2980–2985 (1997).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tans, S. J., et al.: Room-temperature transistor based on a single carbon nanotube. Nature, 393, 49–52 (1998).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Javey, A., et al.: High-κ dielectrics for advanced carbon nanotube transistors and logic gates. Nat. Mater., 1, 241–246 (2002).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barik M. A., Dutta, J. C.: Fabrication and characterization of junctionless carbon nanotube field effect transistor for cholesterol detection, App. Phys. Lett.,105, 053509(1–5) (2014).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiten Chandra Dutta
    • 1
    Email author
  • Purnima Kumari Sharma
    • 1
  • Hiranya Ranjan Thakur
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringTezpur UniversityTezpurIndia

Personalised recommendations