Scrutiny of VANET Protocols on the Basis of Communication Scenario and Implementation of WAVE 802.11p/1609.4 with NS3 Using SUMO

  • Arjun AroraEmail author
  • Nitin Rakesh
  • Krishn K. Mishra
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 553)


Around the world governments have made many policies and laws in order to avoid accidents that occur on road, however, they seem to be unavoidable. Therefore, it becomes important to take care of road safety. This is where VANETs have helped in introducing various applications primarily based on V2V and V2I communication which have helped in increasing safety of commuters on road. Although to deploy VANET successfully the following things have to be kept in mind: First range of wireless networks, second secure communication and lastly stable network performance. When we look into VANETs we find that there are primarily two unique forms of communication available. The environments where VANETs are deployed are mainly the highways and cities/towns. VANET communication on highways is fairly simple to implement but when it is to be deployed in cities communication becomes complex. This is because cities have congested outlook mainly because of buildings, trees and houses, etc. And it is not possible to always have direct communication between nodes in the intended direction. This paper analyses the different protocols in VANET and make a comparison on the basis of communication. Also this paper shows a scenario based implementation of Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE) 802.11p/1609.4.


VANET Vehicular communication V2V V2I Communication protocols 


  1. 1.
    Chen, Q., Jiang, D., and Delgrossi, L. 2009. “IEEE 1609.4 DSRC multi-channel operations and its implications on vehicle safety communications”. In Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), 2009 IEEE (pp. 1–8). IEEE.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Di Felice, M., Ghandour, A. J., Artail, H., and Bononi, L.2012. “On the Impact of Multi-channel Technology onSafety-Message Delivery in IEEE 802.11 p/1609.4Vehicular Networks”. In Computer Communications andNetworks (ICCCN), 2012 21st International Conference on (pp. 1–8). IEEE.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Bessani, M. Correia, B. Quaresma, F. Andr, and P. Sousa, “Dep-Sky: dependable and secure storage in a cloud-of-clouds,” Proc. Sixth conference on computer systems (EuroSys’11), ACM, 2011, pp. 31–46.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Sehrish; G. Mackey; P. Shang; J. Wang; J. Bent, “Supporting HPC Analytics Applications with Access Patterns Using Data Restructuring and Data-Centric Scheduling Techniques in Map Reduce,” Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 158,169, Jan. 2013.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. George; V. Venugopal, “Design and performance measurement of a high-performance computing cluster,” Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), 2012 IEEE International, vol. no., pp. 2531,2536, 13–16 May 2012.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Ramakrishnan, R. S. Canon, K. Muriki, I. Sakrejda, and N. J. Wright. “Evaluating Interconnect and virtualization performance for high performance computing”, ACM Performance Evaluation Review, 40(2), 2012.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. Khaitiyakun, T. Sanguankotchakorn, and A. Tunpan. “Data dissemination on manet using content delivery network(cdn) technique”. In Information Networking (ICOIN), 2014 International Conferenceon, pages 502–506, Feb2014.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jinwoo Nam, Seong-Mun Kim and Sung-Gi Min, “Extended wireless mesh network for VANET with geographical routing protocol,” 11th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM 2015), Shanghai, 2015, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y. Bai, D. Xie, S. Wang and M. Zhong, “Multi-path transmission protocol in VANET,” 2015 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), Shenzhen, 2015, pp. 204–209.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Jiang, & L. Delgrossi, (2008). “IEEE 802.11p: towards an international standard for wireless access in vehicular environments”. In Proceedings of 67th IEEE vehicular technology conference on vehicular technology (pp. 2036–2040), May 2008.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Zhao, and G. Cao,2008. “VADD: Vehicle-Assisted Data Delivery in Vehicular”. Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions on. 57.3.1910–1922.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. O. Chelha and S. Rakrak, “Best nodes approach for alert message dissemination in VANET (BNAMDV),” RFID And Adaptive Wireless Sensor Networks (RAWSN), 2015 Third International Workshop on, Agadir, 2015, pp. 82–85.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K.C. Lee, U. Lee, and M. Gerla, Oct. 2009. “Survey of routing protocols in vehicular ad hoc networks”. Advances in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks: Developments and Challenges, IGI Global.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Yan, D. B. Rawat and B. B. Bista, “Towards Secure Vehicular Clouds,” Proc. Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS), 2012 Sixth International Conference on, 2012, pp. 370–375.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    F. Granelli, G. Boato, and D. Kliazovich, 2006. “MORA:A movement-based routing algorithm for vehicle adhoc networks”. 1st IEEE Workshop on Automotive Networking and Applications (AutoNet 2006) 2006. San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Pearson and A. Benameur, Privacy, “Security and Trust Issues Arising from Cloud Computing”. Proc. Cloud Computing Technology and Science(CloudCom), 2012 IEEE Second International Conference on, 2012, pp. 693–702.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Atéchian, L. Brunie, J. Roth, and J. Gutiérrez. “DGcastoR: direction-based geo-cast routing protocol for query dissemination in VANET”. IADIS International Telecommunications, Networks and Systems. 2008.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Festag, (2009). “Global standardization of network and transport protocols for ITS with 5 GHz radio technologies”. In Proceedings of the ETSI TC ITS workshop, Sophia Antipolis, France, February 2009.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. K. Shrestha, S. Moh, I. Chung, and D. Choi 2010. “Vertex-based multi-hop vehicle-to infrastructure routing for vehicular ad hoc networks”. In IEEE proceedings of 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    L. Kristiana, C. Schmitt and B. Stiller, “Survey of angle-based forwarding methods in VANET communications,” 2016 Wireless Days (WD), Toulouse, 2016, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. Grafling, P. Mahonen, & J. Riihijarvi. “Performance evaluation of IEEE 1609 WAVE and IEEE802.11 p for vehicular communications”. In Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), 2010 Second International Conference on (pp. 344–348). IEEE.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Praveen. K. Gupta and Nitin Rakesh, “Different Job Scheduling Methodologies for Web Application and Web Server in a Cloud Computing Environment”, 2010 3rd International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology, IEEE, Pages 569–572, Goa, India, Nov. 19–21.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nitin Rakesh and Vipin Tyagi, “Linear-code multicast on parallel architectures,” Elsevier Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 42, pp. 1074–1088, 2011.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nitin Rakesh and Nitin, “Analysis of Multi-Sort Algorithm on Multi-Mesh of Trees (MMT) Architecture”, Springer Journal of Supercomputing, vol 57, no 3, pp. 276–313, 2011.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nitin Rakesh and Vipin Tyagi, “Linear Network Coding on Multi-Mesh of Trees using All to All Broadcast,” International Journal of Computer Science Issues, vol 8, no 3, pp. 462–471, 2011.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nitin Rakesh and Vipin Tyagi, “Parallel architecture coding: link failure–recovery mechanism (PAC: LF–RM),” Springer International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, vol 4, no 4, pp. 386–396, 2013.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sandeep Pratap Singh, Shiv Shankar P Shukla, Nitin Rakesh, Vipin Tyagi, “Problem reduction in online payment system using hybrid model”, International Journal of Managing Information Technology (IJMIT) Vol.3, No.3, pp. 62–71, August 2011.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Praveen K Gupta, Nitin Rakesh, “Different job scheduling methodologies for web application and web server in a cloud computing environment”, 2010 3rd International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology (ICETET), pp. 569–572, 2010, India.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    I. B. Jemaa, O. Shagdar, F. J. Martinez, P. Garrido and F. Nashashibi, “Extended mobility management and routing protocols for internet-to-VANET multicasting,” 2015 12th Annual IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), Las Vegas, NV, 2015, pp. 904–909.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Petroleum & Energy StudiesDehradunIndia
  2. 2.Amity UniversityNoidaIndia
  3. 3.Motilal Nehru National Institute of TechnologyAllahabadIndia

Personalised recommendations