Skip to main content

Does a Good Knowledge Base Influence Policy-Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Development and Environmental Policy in India

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Economics ((BRIEFSECONOMICS))

  • 517 Accesses

Abstract

Can the absence of good policy be attributed to the absence of a good theoretical understanding? Or is it that we need to understand the impact of knowledge at different levels, initially on policy as drafted in an overarching manner, and then on the drawing up of rules and laws which govern actual affects at the project and grassroots levels? This chapter examines these issues. It looks at different theoretical understandings of the environment and evaluates their effect, if any, on environmental policy, as well as on the details of laws and rules which give form to that policy. It first distinguishes between theory, models and frameworks. Postulating then that, at times, overarching concepts capture public attention more than detailed frameworks, the chapter then evaluates the policy impact of concepts such as sustainable development, resilience and vulnerability. It also examines the possibility of radical approaches such as de-growth and radical ecological democracy impacting policy. Recent developments in India such as the formulation of the National Environmental Policy, the Forest Rights Act and the move towards low-carbon growth and green accounting are seen as positive developments. On the whole, however, the Indian agenda on environment stands at the crossroads. Two kinds of processes are operating, albeit at different rates. There does exist a gradual understanding in different sections of the impending environmental crises. Other elements in the system, moving at a much faster pace, demand faster growth in the shorter run. These are driven by unconstrained market forces, irresponsible industrialisation and urbanisation. We do not know which way the balance will tilt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Keynes, John Maynard (1936) the General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London, Macmillan.

  2. 2.

    See Basu, K. (2016). In his treatise on the art of policy-making in India, however, the environment or policy relating to it finds no mention.

  3. 3.

    See Agarwal (1997) for an example.

  4. 4.

    See Ostrom (2009).

  5. 5.

    See Ostrom (2009) and Dayal (2014) Chapter 2 for details. Our interest here is in the policy relevance of the framework.

  6. 6.

    See Chap. 8 of Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003, 2005) for details.

  7. 7.

    See Steffen, W. et al. (2015) for planetary boundaries and Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) for the conceptual framework referred to.

  8. 8.

    See IPBES (2016).

  9. 9.

    See McCauley, D.J. Nature 443(7):27–28 (2006) and the MA panel’s response in the same volume of Nature.

  10. 10.

    For a recent exposition, see Purushottaman et al. (2016).

  11. 11.

    See Walker, B. and David Salt (2006).

  12. 12.

    See Cook et al. (2010). The countries included are Chile, China, India, Madagascar, South Africa and Vietnam and the sectors covered aquaculture, sugarcane production, forest and salmon.

  13. 13.

    See Chopra et al. (2009) for more details and implications for policy.

  14. 14.

    See Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) for the conceptual framework.

  15. 15.

    See Srivastava and Kothari (2012) and DeMaria et al. (2013).

  16. 16.

    For more details, see Chopra (forthcoming).

  17. 17.

    See EPW Editorial ‘Choosing Speed Over Diligence’ Economic & Political Weekly, Vol. LI no 23, June 4, 2016.

  18. 18.

    For one such study which builds a scenario for a hill state of India. Himachal Pradesh see Chopra and Das (2010).

  19. 19.

    A number of reviews exist. See among others Sankar (1998 and 2001).

  20. 20.

    See Government of India (2013) and (2014). No follow-up on either seems to have taken place.

  21. 21.

    See Das (2012) for evidence and details.

  22. 22.

    See Jairam Ramesh (2010), for a succinct exposition of the state of the debate and the policymakers’ consequent dilemma. Jairam Ramesh was Minister for the Environment, giving therefore an insiders’ view from the government as well.

References

  • Agarwal B (1997) Bargaining and gender relations, within and beyond the household. Fem Econ 3(1):1–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu K (2016) An economist in the real world, the art of policy making in India. Penguin/ Viking, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra K (forthcoming) In Gerber J-F, Raina R (eds) Articulating green growth and degrowth: can they converge?

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra K, Das S (2010) India environmental outlook 2030: opportunities for growth in the ecologically fragile hill states: a study of Himachal Pradesh. Report submitted to the World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra K, Kumar P, Kapuria P (2009) Biodiversity, land use change and human well-being: a study in the Indian Sundarbans. Oxford University Press, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost reprinted in Sankar, U (ed) Environmental economics. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook JA, Cylke O, Larson DF, Nash JD, Stedman-Edwards P (2010) Vulnerable places, vulnerable: trade liberalisation, rural poverty and the environment. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, London/New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Das S (2012) Pressure for conversion of forest land to non-forest use in India. In: Anon (ed) Deeper roots of historical injustice. Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington, DC, pp 159–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayal V (2014) The environment in economics and development, pluralistic extensions of core economic models. Springer, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Demaria F, Schneider F, Sekulova F, Martinez Alier J (2013) What is degrowth? From an activist slogan to a social movement. Environ Values 22:191–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economic and Political Weekly Editorial (2016) Choosing speed over diligence. Econ Polit Wly 51(23)

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India, Central Statistical Office (2013) Green accounting in India, report of the expert group

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India, Planning Commission (2014) Final report of the expert group on low carbon strategies for India

    Google Scholar 

  • IPBES (2016) The methodological assessment report on scenarios and models for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Summary for Policy Makers, IPBES

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes JM (1936) The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley DJ (2006) Selling out on nature. Nature 443(7):27–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a frame work for assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2009) Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Nobel Lecture, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou AC (1920) The economics of welfare. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Purushothaman S, Ravi C et al. Harini Nagendra Manu Matha et al. doi:10.18472/SustDeb.v7n1.2016.17424

  • Ramesh J (2010) The two cultures revisited: the environment-development debate in India. Econ Pol Wkly 45(42):13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankar U (1998) Laws and institutions relating to environmental protection in India, MSE Occasional Paper No. 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankar U (2001) Environmental Policy. In: Sankar U (ed) Environmental economics. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava A, Kothari A (2012) Churning the earth, the making of global India. Viking/Penguin Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W et al (2015) For planetary boundaries

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2014) Using indicators for green economy policymaking

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Salt D (2006) Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chopra, K. (2017). Does a Good Knowledge Base Influence Policy-Making. In: Development and Environmental Policy in India. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3761-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3761-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3760-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3761-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics