Skip to main content

Rights-Based Approaches: Do Environmental Movements Make a Dent on Policy?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Development and Environmental Policy in India

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Economics ((BRIEFSECONOMICS))

  • 574 Accesses

Abstract

Environmental movements replace deliberation and adjudication by the language of rights, livelihoods or value systems. They usually bring together like-minded stakeholders on issues of common interest. Drawing from the documentation for India, this chapter addresses the following issues: What role can such environmental movements play in the formulation of policy and through what channels? Further, what role have they played in the last three decades in India? Significant environmental movements are analysed from the viewpoint of the impact they have had. Further, impact is defined in three ways, each of which has the potential of initiating an iterative process that influences decision-making in the future. An immediate impact could be in terms of an act passed by the parliament or an executive order influencing the project at hand. Alternatively, impact may be on sectoral policy or the manner in which future projects are evaluated or granted approval. Finally, a change in the macro policy environment could occur which results in a mainstreaming of environmental issues.

We find that environmental justice movements, to have an impact on policy, have to associate themselves with institutions of the judiciary, the executive or the legislature. The executive can be compelled to act only by the legislature through newer laws or by the heavy hand of the courts. Unless the process reaches its logical conclusion within the domain of the political economy, it remains an ‘also ran’ in the arena of policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for instance, the discussions on land and forest policy in Chap. 2.

  2. 2.

    See Sills, David L. (1968).

  3. 3.

    See Chap. 2 for some details of these studies.

  4. 4.

    Some will claim that it was partly responsible for the introduction of Joint Forest Management in the country. Chapter 2 discusses other parallel influences on policy.

  5. 5.

    ‘In a two-to-one decision, it invoked the common law doctrine of latches to rule that the NBA had failed to raise its objections in a timely manner, that the Court was not going to review issues related to design of the Sardar Sarovar Dam itself but only the fundamental rights of the oustees guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and reminded the parties that the decision of a Water Disputes Tribunal (WDT) could not be challenged by private parties once it became binding on the states involved’. See Sahoo et al. (2014).

  6. 6.

    See Gadgil (2014) for a review of the case.

  7. 7.

    For more details, see Cirone (2012).

  8. 8.

    See Joy, K.J. et al. (2008)

  9. 9.

    See the review by Appaswamy in Joy et al. (2008).

  10. 10.

    While this has been ongoing work for some time, the Environmental Justice Organizations, Liabilities and Trade (EJOLT) project gave an impetus to it. See Martinez-Alier (2012) and Martinez-Alier et al. (2016).

  11. 11.

    The EJOLT project has documented about 2000 conflicts and produced an atlas of country and thematic maps (www.Ejolt.org).

  12. 12.

    For a detailed comparative analysis of the two reports, see Chopra (2014).

  13. 13.

    See Jairam Ramesh (2010), for a succinct exposition of the state of the debate and the policymakers’ consequent dilemma.

  14. 14.

    One finds a reference to a manifesto for a Green Party around 2014. See Taghioff (2014).

References

  • Chopra K (2014) Conservation and development in the western ghats a tale of two committees and more. Econ Pol Wkly 49(11):12–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirone M (2012) (CEDAT, Universitat Rovira (Virgili)), The vedanta case in India, EJOLT factsheet no. 46, p 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil M (2014) Western ghats ecology expert panela play in aive acts. Econ Polit Wkly XLIX(18):38–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha R (2006) How much should a person consume: thinking through the environment. Permanent Black/Black Kite, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy KJ, Gujja B, Paranjape S, Gaud V, Vispute S (eds) (2008) Water conflicts in India: a million revolts in the making. Routledge, London (Gujja and Appaswamy papers in this volume)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari A (2016) Decisions of the people, for the people and by the people. The Hindu, May 18, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Alier J (2012) Ecological distribution conflicts and economic growth. In: Bandhopadhyay J et al (eds) Environmental governance: approaches, imperatives and methods. Bloomsbury Publishing India Private Ltd., New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Alier J, Temper L, Demaria F (2016) Social metabolism and environmental conflicts in India. In: Ghosh N et al (eds) Nature, economy and society: understanding the linkages. Springer India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepal P (2009) Environmental movements in India: politics of dynamism and transformation. Authorpress, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh J (2010) The two cultures revisited: the environment-development debate in India. Econ Polit Wkly XLV(42):13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy RV (1998) Environmental movements in India: some reflections. J Indian School Polit Econ 10(4):685–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Rootes C (2007) Environmental movements: from the local to the global. Environ Polit 8(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo T, Prakash U, Sahoo MM (2014) Sardar Sarovar Dam controversy- a case study Glob J Financ Manag 6(9):887–892. ISSN:0975-6477

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena NC, Parasuraman S, Kant P, Baviskar A (2010) Report of the four-member committee for investigation into the proposal submitted by the Orissa mining company for bauxite mining in Niyamgiri, 16 August 2010 (submitted to the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sills DL (1968) International encyclopaedia of the social sciences, vol 14. The Macmillan Company and the Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugathakumari. Silent valley: a case study

    Google Scholar 

  • Taghioff D (2014) Green party of India: manifesto downloaded from http://taghioff.info/manifesto

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chopra, K. (2017). Rights-Based Approaches: Do Environmental Movements Make a Dent on Policy?. In: Development and Environmental Policy in India. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3761-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3761-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3760-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3761-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics