Skip to main content

Is Confucianism Still Relevant Today? Closing Reflections

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Confucianism and Modernization in East Asia
  • 838 Accesses

Abstract

The relevance of Confucianism is examined in the context of both the past and the future. The existing debates on this issue mostly focus on the past. But Kim tries to find answers for the future. As for the future, the issue may be considered on two planes: civilization and society. In terms of the confusion and agonies suffered by humanity in general, moral-ethical decay and ecological degradation are the two most serious concerns, and Confucian moral ideals and cosmological ideas of natural ecology may provide alternative guidelines in these areas. On the societal level, the severe disturbance of social order and the breakdown of community are the two most essential problems. Perhaps one could resort to a system of thoughts based on Confucianism to provide guidance for their resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

References in English Language and References in Korean Language

  • Bell, Daiel A., and Chaibong Hahm. 2003. Confucianism for the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert N., Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Wing-tsit. 1973. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Yun-Shik. 2003. Mutual Help and Democracy in Korea. In Confucianism for the Modern World, ed. Daniel A. Bell and Chai-Bong Hahm, 90–123. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbridge, Stuart. 2000. Development: Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences, 6 vols. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craze, P., 2012. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. Cell Press. London: Elsevier, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, Neil Paul. 2012. An Evolutionary Perspective on the Relationship Between Humans and Their Surroundings: Geoengineering, the Purpose of Life & the Nature of the Universe. Reading, MA: Cranmore Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr, Fred. 1999. Asian Values and Universality. In International Conference on Universal Ethics and Asian Values, 114–125. Seoul: Korean National Commission for UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. 2007. The Idea of Sustainable Development. Sustainability Science 2 (1): 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bary, Wm. Theodore. 1989. Encounter between East and West and the Creation of Global Culture. In The World Community in Post-Industrial Society V, ed. Christian Academy, 13–21. Seoul: Wooseok.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Epilogue: Why Confucius Now? In Confucianism for the Modern World, ed. Daniel A. Bell and Chaibong Hahm, 361–372. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Bary, Wm. Theodore and Irene Bloom. 1999. Sources of Chinese Tradition Vol. I: From Earliest Times to 1600. 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai. 1999. Toward an Asian-Western Set of Virtues. In International Conference on Universal Ethics and Asian Values. 27–58. Seoul: Korean National Commission for UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis. 1998. Asian Values and the Asian Crisis. Commentary (February): 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Yu-Ian. 1983. A History of Chinese Philosophy, 2 vols. Trans. Derek Bodde. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, Donald. 2003. Environmentalism: Ideology and Power. Cambridge, MA: Nova Science Pub Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurvitch, George. 1971. The Social Framework of Knowledge. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesselbein, Frances, Marshall Goldsmith, Richard Beckhard, and Richard F. Schubert. 1998. The Community of the Future. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S. 2004. Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems. Ecosystems 4 (5): 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, Axel. 1999. Mutual Recognition as a Key for a Universal Ethics. In International Conference on Universal Ethics and Asian Values. 73–92. Seoul: Korean National Commission for UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatchadourian, Haig. 1999. Community and Communitarianism. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kormondy, E.E. 1995. Concepts of Ecology. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Nan. 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Thomas Dietz, Stephen R. Carpenter, Carl Folke, Marina Alberti, Charles L. Redman, Stephen H. Schneider, and Elinor Ostrom. 2009. Coupled Human and Natural Systems. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 36 (8): 639–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E.P. 1977. The Emergence of Ecology as a New Integrative Discipline. Science 195 (4284): 1289–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlin, G. 1970. The Evolution of Aid Doctrine. In Foreign Aid, ed. J. Bhagwati and R.S. Eckans, 21–62. Hammonsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse, Jan Nederveen. 2010. Development Theory. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, Karl-Heinz. 1999. Beyond Universalism and Relativism: Reflections on an East-West Intellectual Dialogue. In International Conference on Universal Ethics and Asian Values, 126–142. Seoul: Korean National Commission for UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, Lucien W. 1985. Asian Power and Politics: The Cultural Dynamics of Authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli, S., and J. Newhagen. 1996. Why Communication Researcher Should Study the Internet: A Dialogue. Journal of Communication 46 (1): 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sardar, Ziauddin. 1998. Asian Values are Human Values: Attacks by Western Pundits are Based on Ignorance, Arrogance and Envy. New Statesman 127 (4381): 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Benjamin I. 1985. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seers, Dudley. 1970. The Meaning of Development. The Agricultural Development Council Report, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, James. 1972. The Voluntary Society and Its Components. In Voluntary Action Research: 1972, ed. D.H. Smith, 25–38. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Andy, and Bill Willits. 2004. Creating Community: 5 Keys to Building a Small Group Culture. Sisters, OR: Multnoma Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen, Gert Tinggaard, and Gunnar Lind Haase Svendsen. 2009. Handbook of Social Capital: The Troika of Sociology, Political Science and Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Teilhard de Chardin, P. 1969. The Future of Man. Trans. N. Denny. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu Wei-ming. 1999. A Confucian Perspective on the Core Values of the Global Community. In International Conference on Universal Ethics and Asian Values, 361–375. Seoul: Korean National Commision for UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Confucian Humanism in the 21st Century: China’s Quest for a New Cultural Identity. Seoul: Asan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, Margaret J., and Myron Kellner-Rogers. 1998. The Paradox and Promise of Community. In The Community of the Future, ed. Frances Hesselbein, Marshall Goldsmith, Richard Beckhard, and Richard F. Schubert, 9–18. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. 2011. Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development. Accessed September 28, 2011. UN-documents.net

  • Chi, Kyo-Hŏn, Mun-Hyŏng Cho’e, and Kyunsŏp Pak. 1991. A Study of Village Compact of the Chosŏn Dynasty. Seoul: Minsokwŏn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Hak-Chu. 2009. Analects of Confucius. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Kyong-Dong, and Yojin Kim. 2010. Korean Social Ethics. Seoul: Ch’ŏlhak kwa Hyŏnsil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Yong-Ha, and Kyung-sup Chang. 1996. The Family and Community Culture of Korea in the 21st Century. Seoul: Chisiksanŏpsa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, Sang-Ok. 2003. The Book of Rites III. Seoul: Myŏngmundang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, Sŏk Ho. 1980. Spring and Autumn Annals. III vols. Seoul: Pyŏngbŏmsa.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kyong-Dong, K. (2017). Is Confucianism Still Relevant Today? Closing Reflections. In: Confucianism and Modernization in East Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3626-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics