Abstract
Much of the current discourse of teaching makes explicit reference to globalization. Whether framed as needing teaching to prepare students for a global economy or introduced in terms of how teaching can be improved by learning from the policies and practices of teaching elsewhere, “global” discourses powerfully shape how teaching is currently discussed. This is true in the global north as well as the global south. This is true in a country like the US—proud of its unique history and its often defiant and “exceptional” position—and in a larger regional entity like the EU. These arguments understandably have seeped their way into conversation about the purpose and practice of teacher education. Today new expectations of accountability, shared frequently across borders, and the international rise of market-driven notions about teacher quality and value are influential challenges to conventions of teacher education in many countries. In this chapter, while acknowledging the importance of these phenomena, I explore their consequences and an alternative way to envision how globalization might affect teacher education. In particular, I examine the marginalizing of voices of teacher educators in global discussions of teacher education and invite teacher educators to frame globalization’s imperatives in social and cultural rather than entirely economic terms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Bates (2008) and others are persuasive in arguing against the tendency to paint globalization with a single broad-brush stroke and in so doing ignore the variations as well as the resistance and contrapuntal tendencies of local assertion.
- 2.
Despite overall patterns of increased policy rhetoric about the importance of accountability, the recent TEDS-M (Tatto et al. 2012) study found that while many countries have developed a range of quality assurance mechanisms regarding teacher education, at the level of programs and their accreditation, “rigorous procedures … are rare” (p. 52).
- 3.
Anecdotal evidence from China and the US illustrate the closing of faculties of education as part of this larger trend (Zhang, personal communication; Bronner 1997).
- 4.
A noteworthy exception is the landmark IEA TEDS-M study of teacher preparation policies and practices in 17 countries (Tatto et al. 2012). That investigation included careful analysis of curriculum, content, and learning opportunities in teacher education programs for future mathematics teachers.
- 5.
Seating arrangements at the forum placed key stakeholders—policymakers from national ministries and international organizations, “expert” (scholars) and consultants—around the main stage/table, while teachers were sitting on the sides as observers, not central participants (Paine et al. in press).
References
Akiba, M. (Ed.). (2013). Teacher reforms around the world: Implementations and outcomes. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
Auguste, B., Kihn, P., & Miller, M. (2010). Closing the talent gap: Attracting and retaining top-tier graduates to careers in teaching. London: McKinsey & Company.
Avery, P. G. (2004). Social studies teacher education in an era of globalization. In S. A. Adler (Ed.), Critical issues in social studies teacher education (pp. 37–57). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Aydarova, O. (2015). Glories of the Soviet past or dim visions of the future: Russian teacher education as the site of historical becoming. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 46(2), 147–166.
Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing systems come out on top. London: McKinsey & Company.
Bates, R. (2008). Teacher education in a global context: Towards a defensible theory of teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(4), 277–293. doi:10.1080/02607470802401388
Bronner, E. (1997). The end of Chicago’s education school stirs debate. New York Times (Sept. 17)
Bruno-Jofré, R., & Johnston, J. S. (Eds.). (2014). Teacher education in a transnational world. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Contini, R. M., & Herold, M. (2015). Intercultural Education in Italy and in the United States: The Results of a Binational Inquiry. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 7(1), 203–218. Retrieved from http://msulibraries.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw3V1LT8JAEN6gJ6MxPuMz2ZOXpqTdlj5MPABCIFEwBS4eJNvt1pBIIQL_353u9gF4Uk8emrTbdLfd_To7M5n5BiGLVA19QyZwJvRi5sWmOEI7oh7hVsjgxCcktiGV-LVORm37ZeC2K5UscbBo-w8Ln_r4ckKNPIADHBtdoWlnfEvbGmcW4hHwhXh6ITMnG5PcXViOGs4ovSE3fUm1YDalCacLRrU5uItX2bhCaEDEYgQ1BCT_R74NBKJniL5Z8Q-qNfu9YbeXe3CfwYIXANU6raD_9Fh2TZi1IoRKSjCghtd9IiuDVPk3bUoEu1tIU-LUsEo7M1GSeo00u0STukGaDeGF49nn-1gtxTi0QX3x_Mi1QtsJwVQzwjhiQg3iVsxqd8C2Po0mbPnAE3002BGmvOeWzHQho0zi-gZR_ELpbu-DFgCuPCDG110rLYy
Crowley, C. B. (2016). Teach for/future China and the politics of alternative teacher certification programs in China. In L. Lim & M. W. Apple (Eds.), The strong state and curricular reform: Assessing the politics and possibilities of educational change in Asia (pp. 131–147). New York: Routledge.
Dale, R., & Robertson, S. L. (2002). The varying effects of regional organizations as subjects of globalization of education. Comparative Education Review, 46(1), 10–36.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world of education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Lieberman, L. (Eds.). (2012). Teacher education around the world: Changing policies and practices. London: Routledge.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wie, R. C., & Andree, A. (2010). How high-achieving countries develop great teachers. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education Research Brief.
Dion, D. (2013). Global education exploration study: Key findings and implications. New York: ProjectExplorer.org.
Dunn, A. H. (2013). Teachers without borders? The hidden consequences of international teachers in US schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Dunn, A. H., Dotson, E. K., Cross, S. B., Kesner, J., & Lundahl, B. (2014). Reconsidering the local after a transformative global experience: A comparison of two study abroad programs for preservice teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 36(4), 283–304.
Eisikovits, R. A. (2008). Coping with high-achieving transnationalist immigrant students: The experience of Israeli teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 277–289. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.06.006
Feuer, M. J., Floden, R. E., Chudowsky, N., & Ahn, J. (2013). Evaluation of teacher preparation programs: Purposes, methods, and policy options. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Gardner, D. P. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: The National Commission on Excellence in Education, US Department of Education.
Gaudelli, W. (2003). World class: Teaching and learning in global times. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gómez-Hurtado, I., & Coronel, J. M. (2015). Nothing to do with me! Teachers’ perceptions on cultural diversity in Spanish secondary schools. Teachers and Teaching, 21(4), 400–420. doi:10.1080/13540602.2014.968896
Gopinathan, S., Tan, S., Fang, Y., Devi, L., Ramos, C., & Chao. E. (2008). Transforming teacher education: Redefined professionals for 21st century schools. Singapore: National Institute of Education.
Horst, C., & Holmen, A. (2007). Bringing multicultural education into the mainstream: Developing schools for minority and majority students. In L. Adams & A. Kirova (Eds.), Global migration and education: Schools, children, and families (pp. 17–33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Kabilan, M. (2013). A phenomenological study of an international teaching practicum: Preservice teachers’ experiences of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 198–209.
Kalekin-Fishman, D., Pitkanen, P., & Verma, G. (Eds.). (2002). Education and immigration: Settlement policies and current challenges.
Kim, S. K., & Kim, L. H. (2012). The need for multicultural education in South Korea. In D. A. Urias (Ed.), The Immigration & Education Nexus (pp. 243–253). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Knodel, P., Martens, K., & Niemann, D. (2013). PISA as an ideational roadmap for policy change: Exploring Germany and England in a comparative perspective. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 11(3), 421–441.
Labaree, D. F. (2004). The trouble with ed schools. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Levine, A. (2006). Educating school teachers. Education Schools Project.
Luke, A. (2004). Teacher after the marketplace: From commodity to cosmopolitan. Teachers College Record, 106, 1422–1443.
MacBeath, J. (2012). Future of teaching profession. Educational International Research Institute and University of Cambridge.
Mahan, J., & Cushner, K. (2002). The overseas student teaching experience: Creating optimal culture learning. Multicultural Perspectives, 4(3), 3–8.
Marginson, S. (2010). Global comparisons and the university knowledge economy. In Higher education, policy, and the global competition phenomenon (pp. 29–41). Palgrave Macmillan US.
Merryfield, M. M. (2002). The difference a global educator can make. Educational Leadership, 60(2), 18–21.
Noddings, N. (Ed.). (2005). Educating citizens for global awareness. NY: Teachers College Press.
OECD. (2007). Assessing higher education learning outcomes summary of first meeting of experts. Paris: OECD
Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self-evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162.
Paine, L. (2013). Exploring the interaction of global and local in teacher education: Circulating notions of what preparing a good teacher entails. In X. D. Zhu & K. Zeicher (Eds.), Preparing teachers for the 21st century (pp. 119–140). New York: Springer.
Paine, L. (2014). Helping future teachers learn from short-term study abroad. Presentation to the Annual Meeting of the Comparative and International Education Society, Montreal, Canada.
Paine, L., Aydarova, O., & Syahril, I. (in press). Globalization and teacher education (Chapter 68). In D. J. Clandinin & J. Husu (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher education. New York: Sage Publications.
Paine, L., & Zeichner, K. (2012). The local and the global in reforming teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education Review, 56(4), 569–583.
Rizvi, F. (2004). Debating globalization and education after September 11. Comparative Education, 40(2), 157–171.
Robertson, S. (2012). Placing teachers in global governance agendas. Comparative Education Review, 56(4), 584–607.
Shahjahan, R. A. (2013). Coloniality and a global testing regime in higher education: Unpacking the OECD’s AHELO initiative. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 676–694. doi:10.1080/02680939.2012.758831
Shahjahan, R. A., & Morgan, C. (2016). Global competition, coloniality, and the geopolitics of knowledge in higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(1), 92–109. doi:10.1080/01425692.2015.1095635
Tamer, M. (2014). The education of immigrant children. Retrieved from https://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/uk/14/12/education-immigrant-children
Tatto, M. T. (2007). Education reform and the global regulation of teachers’ education, development and work: A cross-cultural analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(4), 231–241.
Tatto, M. T., & Plank, D. (2007). The dynamics of global teaching reform. In M. T. Tatto (Ed.), Reforming teaching globally (pp. 267–277). Oxford, UK: Symposium Books.
Tatto, M. T., Richmond, G., & Carter Andrews, D. J. (2016). The research we need in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 247–250.
Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S. L., Ingvarson, L., Rowley, G., & Peck, R. (2012). Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries: Findings from the IEA teacher education and development study in mathematics (TEDS-M). Amsterdam: IEA.
Xu, S., Chen, S., & Huang, J. (2015). Pedagogies of working with diversity: West-East reciprocal learning in preservice teacher education. In International teacher education: Promising pedagogies (Part B). Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 22, pp. 137–160). Emerald Publishing Group.
Zeichner, K. (2014). The struggle for the soul of teaching and teacher education in the USA. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(5), 551–568.
Zhao, Y. (2010). Preparing globally competent teachers: A new imperative for teacher education. Journal of teacher education, 61(5), 422–431.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paine, L. (2017). Alternative Framing of Teacher Education: A Challenge for Teacher Education in an Age of Globalization. In: Zhu, X., Goodwin, A., Zhang, H. (eds) Quality of Teacher Education and Learning. New Frontiers of Educational Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3549-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3549-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3547-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3549-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)