Skip to main content

Design Thinking and Creative Problem Solving for Undergraduate Engineering Education in India: The Need and Relevance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Research into Design for Communities, Volume 2 (ICoRD 2017)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 66))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A way to spark design, creativity and innovation culture in the country is by encouraging Design Thinking and Creative Problem Solving in the vast spread of technical educational institutes in India. Facilitating them in engineering education would benefit students by providing them a structure to think creatively and meaningfully in their education and future profession. At the same time, it would bring the much-needed awareness about design’s deeper notion of being a systematic and creative problem solving approach among engineering students. This would increase the value of design in the community of engineers. A study to evaluate the need and relevance of design thinking and creative problem solving from the perspective of engineering students was conducted in the name of a ‘pop-up class’ for one week, without any credit incentives at the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi (IITD). 30 3rd year Bachelor students from various technical fields (chemical, mechanical, civil, production engineering, textile, electrical engineering and engineering physics) participated in the study. They were introduced to the topic via a mix of theoretical lectures, case discussions and practical workshops. The workshop had been evaluated by the students with a questionnaire at the end of the study and subsequently analyzed. All respondents answered that Design Thinking and Creative Problem Solving are relevant for their education. 90% responded positively to the suggestion of introducing such a course in their education stating that it’s important for engineers to know how to solve real world problems in a meaningful way, and by this to drive innovation. Although most students agreed that it should become a compulsory course, they feared for its value, when it would become grade oriented like other courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Confederation of Indian Industry, India Design Report (2011). Print

    Google Scholar 

  2. IDC at IIT Bombay: Design manifesto: for a design enabled technical education (15 Jan 2014). Accessed 26 Oct 2015. http://design.iith.ac.in/pdfs/DesignManifesto.pdf

  3. Workshop Report, Transforming undergraduate education in engineering, American Society for Engineering Education, 9–10 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nelson, H. G., Stolterman, E.: The Design Way. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, T.: Change By Design. HarperCollins, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Badke-Schaub, P., Roozenburg, N., Cardoso, C.: (2010) Design thinking: a paradigm on its way from dilution to meaninglessness. In: Proceedings of the 8th Design Thinking Research Symposium (DTRS8)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dym, C.L., Agogino, A.M., Eris, O., Frey, D.D., Leifer, L.J.: Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. J. Eng. Educ. 94(1), 103–120 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clause, C.: Divergent Thinking in Psychology: Definition & Examples. Retrieved 10 November 2015, from http://study.com/academy/lesson/divergent-thinking-in-psychology-definition-examples-quiz.html. (n.d.)

  9. Martin, R.L.: The Opposable Mind: How Successful Leaders Win through Integrative Thinking. Harvard Business School, Boston, MA (2007, Print)

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Bono, E.: Lateral Thinking: Creativity Step by Step. Harper & Row, New York (1970, Print)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Buzan, T., Buzan, B.: The Mind Map Book: How to Use Radiant Thinking to Maximize Your Brain’s Untapped Potential. New York: Dutton, 1994. Print

    Google Scholar 

  12. Popova, M.: The Art of Thought: A Pioneering 1926 Model of the Four Stages of Creativity (Feb 2016). Retrieved March 25, 2016, from https://www.brainpickings.org/2013/08/28/the-art-of-thought-graham-wallas-stages/

  13. Osborn, A.: CPS (Creative Problem Solving) model. Retrieved March 25, 2016, from http://members.optusnet.com.au/charles57/Creative/Brain/cps.htm. (n.d.)

  14. Buijs, J.A., Meer, H.V.: Integrated creative problem solving. Hague, Netherlands: Eleven International Publishing (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Treffinger, D.J., Isaksen, S.G., Dorval, K.B.: Creative problem solving: an overview. In: Runco, M.A. (ed.) Problem Finding, Problem Solving and Creativity. Ablex Publishing Company, Norwood, NJ (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pugh, S.: Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-41639-5 (Feb 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cross, N.: Designerly Ways of Knowing. Birkhauser. ISBN 978 3764384845 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A heartfelt thanks to Prof. PVM Rao from the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi for his motivation, support and guidance throughout the practical study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tigmanshu Bhatnagar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1: Research Questionnaire

Appendix 1: Research Questionnaire

Part 1 (1 is bad, 5 or 10 is excellent)

For how many days did you manage to attend the course?

How would you rate the overall learning experience of the course?

\( 1\quad \quad 2\quad \quad 3\quad \quad 4\quad \quad 5 \)

With respect to your engineering studies, how relevant do you think is Design Thinking?

\( 1\quad \quad 2\quad \quad 3\quad \quad 4\quad \quad 5\quad \quad 6\quad \quad 7\quad \quad 8\quad \quad 9\quad \quad 10 \)

With respect to your engineering studies, how relevant is the creative problem solving process?

\( 1\quad \quad 2\quad \quad 3\quad \quad 4\quad \quad 5\quad \quad 6\quad \quad 7\quad \quad 8\quad \quad 9\quad \quad 10 \)

With respect to your engineering studies, how useful are the idea generation techniques?

\( 1\quad \quad 2\quad \quad 3\quad \quad 4\quad \quad 5\quad \quad 6\quad \quad 7\quad \quad 8\quad \quad 9\quad \quad 10 \)

What kind of an effect did the learning have on your approach to solve problems?

\( 1\quad \quad 2\quad \quad 3\quad \quad 4\quad \quad 5\quad \quad 6\quad \quad 7\quad \quad 8\quad \quad 9\quad \quad 10 \)

Part 2

Comparing to the last day’s experience to the first. (1 is bad, 10 is excellent)

What happened to the quantity of ideas?

\( 1\quad \quad 2\quad \quad 3\quad \quad 4\quad \quad 5\quad \quad 6\quad \quad 7\quad \quad 8\quad \quad 9\quad \quad 10 \)

What happened to the quality of solutions?

\( 1\quad \quad 2\quad \quad 3\quad \quad 4\quad \quad 5\quad \quad 6\quad \quad 7\quad \quad 8\quad \quad 9\quad \quad 10 \)

How about the process? What effect did it had on the final outcomes?

\( 1\quad \quad 2\quad \quad 3\quad \quad 4\quad \quad 5\quad \quad 6\quad \quad 7\quad \quad 8\quad \quad 9\quad \quad 10 \)

How was the experience of working in a team?

\( 1\quad \quad 2\quad \quad 3\quad \quad 4\quad \quad 5\quad \quad 6\quad \quad 7\quad \quad 8\quad \quad 9\quad \quad 10 \)

Part 3

Do you think that ‘design thinking for undergraduate engineers’ should be a semester course (like an elective) for all students?

Y/N

Why do you think so?

Any suggestions for improvements?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bhatnagar, T., Badke-Schaub, P. (2017). Design Thinking and Creative Problem Solving for Undergraduate Engineering Education in India: The Need and Relevance. In: Chakrabarti, A., Chakrabarti, D. (eds) Research into Design for Communities, Volume 2. ICoRD 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 66. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3521-0_81

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3521-0_81

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3520-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3521-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics