Skip to main content

‘What Ideality Tool’ (WIT) for Product Design Briefs

Transitioning from a Static Flowchart to a Dynamic Automation Tool

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research into Design for Communities, Volume 2 (ICoRD 2017)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 66))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper discusses the relationship between the ‘WHAT’ and ‘HOW’ concepts in the design process through the innovative ‘What Ideality Tool’ (‘WIT’). The abstract tool draws on nature ideality principles, crossing from the traditional static flowchart model to a dynamic automation tool, promoting design procedures by focusing on the ‘WHAT’ as a creative engine, instead of skipping ahead to the ‘HOW’. Many product designers rush into a design solution without thorough analysis of a product’s intended purpose. Applying ‘WIT’ in the ideation stage to create the designer brief serves as a preemptive tool for handling cognitive obstacles; this results in the paradox wherein the more experienced a designer is, the less flexible the design approach becomes. Hence, their range of ideas essentially becomes their ‘fixed design style’. The ‘WIT’ approach enriches designers’ mindset abilities, expanding the creativity flow by exposing distant connections, and promoting sustainable attributes necessary in today’s market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. The Hannover Principles, EXPO 2000 http://www.mcdonough.com/principles.pdf

  2. Orr, D.W.: The Nature of Design: Ecology, Culture, and Human Intention, 50. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christopher Jones, J.: Seeds of Human Futures (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roozenburg, N.F.M., Eekles, J.: Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods. Wiley (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Agogué, M., et al.: The impact of age and training on creativty: a design theory approach to study fixation effects. Thinking Skills and creativity (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ullman, D.G.: The Mechanical Design Process, 4th edn (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weiss, A., et al.: The Ideality “WHAT” model for product design. In: International Conference. Loughborough University School of Design, Loughborough, UK (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Visser, W.: The Cognitive Artifacts of Designing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Veronese, R:. Advancing the Next Paradigm Shift in Design Automation (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weiss, A., et al.: “What Ideality Tool” (WIT) Product Design Briefs, Fusion and Confluence in Design Management. In: International Conference NordDesign at NTNU Norway (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Werhane, P., Bowie, N.E.: Management Ethics. Wiley (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dunbar, K.: The Analogical Paradox: Why Analogy is so Easy in Naturalistic Settings Yet so Difficult in the Psychological Laboratory. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dylla, N.: Thinking methods and procedures in mechanical design [Ph.D. Thesis]: Mechanical design, Technical University of Munich (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nelson, B.A., Yen, J., Wilson, J.O, Rosen, D.: The effects of biological examples in idea generation. Des. Stud. 31 (2), 169–186 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reich, C.Y., Greenberg, Y., Helfman, S.: Sustainability strategies in nature. In: 7th Design and Nature Conference, Opatija (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Holdrege, C.: Goethe and the Evolution of Science. http://natureinstitute.org; http://natureinstitute.org/pub/ic/ic31/goethe.pdf (2014)

  17. Nagela, R.L., Stone, R.B., McAdams D.A., Nagela, J.K.S.: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, vol. 24/Special Issue 04, pp. 521–535. Cambridge University Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wiltgen, B., Helms, M., Goel, A., Yen, J., Vattam, S: DANE: fostering creativity in and through biologically inspired design. In: Proceedings of First International Conference on Design Creativity, pp. 127–132. Kobe, Japan (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Glier, M.W., et al.: Evaluating methods for bioinspired concept generation. In: Gero, J.S. (ed.) Design Computing and Cognition DCC’12, pp. 1–20 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Benyus, J.: Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature. Quill, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bogatyreva, O.A., Bogatyrev, N.R., Vincent, J.F., et al.: Biomimetics: Its practice and theory. J. R. Soc. Interface 3(9), 471–482 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Altshuller, G.: The Innovation Algorithm, TRIZ, Systematic Innovation and Technical creativity. Technical Innovation Center, Inc., Worcester, MA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reich, C.Y., Helfman, Y.: Introduction of the ideality tool for sustainable design. In: International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), Milan (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yang, Y.-C., Chen, J.L.: Eco-Innovation by Integrating Biomimetic with TRIZ Ideality and Evolution Rules, pp. 101–106 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sullivan, L.H.: http://www.britannica.com/biography/Louis-Sullivan (1896)

  26. Oxman, N.: Design at the intersection of technology and biology. https://www.ted.com/ (2015)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alon Weiss .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Weiss, A., avital, I., Das, A.K., Gedalya, M., Kalita, P.C. (2017). ‘What Ideality Tool’ (WIT) for Product Design Briefs. In: Chakrabarti, A., Chakrabarti, D. (eds) Research into Design for Communities, Volume 2. ICoRD 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 66. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3521-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3521-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3520-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3521-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics