Skip to main content

Supporting Environmentally-Benign Design: Environmental Impact Estimation and Uncertainty Categories with Respect to Life Cycle Assessment in Conceptual Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 66))

Abstract

The goal of the conceptual design stage is to specify the solution principle, i.e., the concept; to design an environmentally-benign product, it is imperative that the most environmentally-benign concept is selected. However this selection can occur only upon evaluation of alternative solution-variants with respect to their potential environmental impacts. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is the most widely used approach to estimate environmental impacts of a product. However, at these early stages of design, information available on the lifecycle of the concepts is incomplete, subjecting LCA results to various sources of uncertainty. The environmental impact of a concept can thus be better gauged only upon considering the uncertainty in this estimation of impact. This paper proposes an uncertainty category called ‘solution-variant definition’, to be used in conceptual design, as a precursor to the more established uncertainty category called ‘structure definition’ for use at the embodiment design stage. It also elucidates that each sub-category of ‘solution-variant definition’ can be described using the ‘outcomes’ of the SAPPhIRE Model of Causality, and exhibits the same flow of causality. It is proposed that considering this uncertainty, along with other, more established uncertainties in Environmental Impact estimation, would support consideration of uncertainties in Conceptual design as opposed to only later in embodiment stages. This paper presents as to how decisions taken earlier could have a profound impact on the product with respect to its environmental-benignity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bras, B.: Incorporating environmental issues in product design and realization. Industry and Environment, Special Issue on Product Design and the Environment, United Nations Environment Programme Industry and Environment (UNEP/IE), Vol. 20, No. 1–2 (double issue) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kotelnikov, V.: Design for Environment—New Approaches. Green Productivity, Tech Monitor (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kota, S., Chakrabarti, A.: ACLODS: a holistic framework for product lifecycle design. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 19, Nos. 1/2/3 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vezzoli, C., Manzini, E.: Design for Environmental Sustainability. Springer, London (2008). ISBN 978-1-84800-162-6

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harris, et al. (ed.): A Survey of Sustainable Development: Social and Economic Dimensions. Island Press, Washington, D.C. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Srinivasan, V., Chakrabarti, A.: Investigating novelty–outcome relationships in engineering design. AIEDAM 24(2), 161–178 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., Grote, K.-H.: Engineering Design—A Systematic Approach. 3rd English edition. Springer, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Acharya, S., Chakrabarti, A.: Supporting environmentally-benign design—elucidating environmental impact propagation in conceptual design phase through SAPPhIRE model of causality. In: International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15), Milan, Italy (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. EPA, U. S.: Life-Cycle Design Guidance Manual. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington DC. (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Congress, U. S.: Green Products by Design: Choices for a Cleaner Environment. Office of Technology Assessment (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Züst, R.: Sustainable products and processes, ECO-performance. In: Third International Seminar on Life Cycle Engineering CIRP ’92, pp. 5–10 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kota, S., Chakrabarti, A.: A method for estimating the degree of uncertainty with respect to life cycle assessment during design. J. Mech. Des (ASME). 132, 091007/1-9 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. French, M.: Conceptual Design for Engineers, 3rd edn. Springer, London, UK (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Blessing, L., Chakrabarti, A.: DRM, a Design Research Methodology. Springer, London (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Cross, N.: Engineering Design Methods—Strategies for Product Design. Wiley, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Duflou, J., Dewulf, W., et.al.: (2002) Parametric eco-efficiency analysis: a DfE support tool. In: Proceedings of 9th CIRP—Life Cycle Seminar (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao, F., Ramani, K., et al.: Integration of sustainability into early design through the function impact matrix. J. Mech. Des. Trans. ASME 132:081004 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sigel, K., Klauer, B., Pahl-Wostl, C.: Conceptualising uncertainty in environmental decision-making: the example of the EU water framework directive. Ecol. Econ. 69, 502–510 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Benetto, E., Dujet, C.: Uncertainty Analysis and MCDA; a case study in the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) practice. European Working Group “Multicriteria Aid for Decisions”, Series 3, no 7, Spring, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wood, K. L.: A method for representation and manipulation of uncertainties in preliminary engineering design. Dissertation (Ph.D.), California Institute of Technology (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wood, K.L., Antonsson, E.K.: Computations with imprecise parameters in engineering design: background and theory. ASME J. Mech. Transm. Autom. Des. 111(4):616–625 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hubka, V., Eder, W.E.: Introduction to the Needs, Scope & Organization of Engineering Design Knowledge. Design Science. Springer, London (1996). http://deed.ryerson.ca/DesignScience

  23. Ranjan, B.S.C., Srinivasan, V., Chakrabarti, A.: System-environment view in designing (Chap. 7). In: CIRP Design 2012: Sustainable Product Development, pp. 59–69 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shakuntala Acharya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Acharya, S., Chakrabarti, A. (2017). Supporting Environmentally-Benign Design: Environmental Impact Estimation and Uncertainty Categories with Respect to Life Cycle Assessment in Conceptual Design. In: Chakrabarti, A., Chakrabarti, D. (eds) Research into Design for Communities, Volume 2. ICoRD 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 66. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3521-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3521-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3520-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3521-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics