Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Paradoxes of Social Partnership and Union Revival in India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Critical Perspectives on Work and Employment in Globalizing India

  • 474 Accesses

Abstract

After the adoption of economic reforms, trade unions in India find themselves excluded from the political processes and institutions that shape labour market policies of the state. Equally, the exigencies of global capitalism have as some argue weakened the collective bargaining power of trade unions. In this context, trade unions are being urged by policy analysts and academics alike to engage in cooperative relationship with employers. It is suggested that labour–management cooperation or social partnership will offer Indian trade unions a route to revive their fortunes. Using survey data from workplace trade union representatives of one of the largest national union federations in India, namely the Indian National Trade Union Congress (INTUC), this paper examines whether the policy prescription of social partnership has any merits for trade union revival. Findings indicate that despite a favourable legislative framework that may support enterprise-level social partnership, the ground realities of workplace industrial relations characterized by increasing employer hostility towards unions render social partnership an ineffective route for trade union revival. These findings are discussed within the context of judicial interventions in employment law and political affiliations of trade unions. This paper suggests union mobilization as an alternative strategy to social partnership for union revival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Following the election of the Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) government at the centre in May 2014, some state governments such as the Government of Rajasthan have amended the IDA 1947 to raise the limit of workers employed in an enterprise from 100 to 300.

References

  • Ackers, P., Marchington, M., Wilkinson, A. J., & Dundon, T. (2004). Partnership and voice, with or without trade unions: changing UK management approaches to organisational participation. In M. Stuart, & L. Martinez Lucio M (Eds.), Partnership and Modernisation in Employment Relations (pp. 23–45). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., Burgess, R., Redding, S. J., & Zilibotti, F. (2008). The unequal effects of liberalization: Evidence from dismantling the License Raj in India. The American Economic Review, 98(4), 1397–1412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahsan, A., & Pages, C. (2009). Are all labour regulations equal? Evidence from Indian manufacturing. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(1), 62–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babu, S.I., & Shetty, R. (2007). Social justice and labour jurisprudence: Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer’s contributions. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badigannavar, V., & Kelly, J. (2005). Why are some union organizing campaigns more successful than others?. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(3), 515–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badigannavar, V., & Kelly, J. (2011). Partnership and organizing: An empirical assessment of two contrasting approaches to union revitalization in the UK. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 32(1), 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badigannavar, V. (2012). Labour market regulations and the prospects of social partnership in India. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 14(2), 129–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, T., & Burgess, R. (2004). Can labour regulation hinder economic performance? Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 91–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belanger, J., & Edwards, P. (2007). The conditions promoting compromise in the workplace. British journal of industrial relations, 45(4), 713–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. (2004). In defence of globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, K. (2004). Parties and unions in the new global economy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, A., & Dasgupta, B. (2007). Disinterring the report of the national commission on labour: A marxist perspective. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(21).

    Google Scholar 

  • Claydon, T. ( 1998). Problematising partnership: The prospects for a cooperative bargaining agenda. In P. Sparrow & M. Marchington (Eds.), Human Resource Management: The New Agenda. (pp. 180–192). London: FT Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confederation of Indian Industry (CII). (2006). Summary of recommendations on union budget 2006–07. New Delhi: CII. Retrieved December 9, 2009, from www.ciionline.org.

  • Cox, J. (2008, Nov–Dec). Judiciary leaves contract labour in the cold. Combat Law, pp. 68–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza, E. (2010). The employment effects of labour legislation in India: A critical essay. Industrial Relations Journal, 41(2), 122–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. (2010). Managing people at work: Employment relations in globalizing India. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, S., Sarkar, P. (2011). Indian labour law and its impact on unemployment 1970–2006: A leximetric study. (Working Paper No. 428). Cambridge, MA: University of Cambridge, Centre for Business Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, L. K., Sharma, A. N., Karan, A. K., & Sarkar, S. (2004). Liberalization and labour: Labour flexibility in Indian manufacturing. New Delhi: Institute for Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagernas, S. (2007). Labour law, judicial efficacy and informal employment in India. (Working Paper No. 353). Cambridge, MA: University of Cambridge, Centre for Business Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, P. R., & Lucas, R. E. B. (1993). Job security regulations and the dynamic demand for industrial labour in India and Zimbabwe. Journal of Development Economics, 40(2), 241–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geppert, M., & Williams, K. (2006). Global, national and local practices in multinational corporations: towards a sociopolitical framework. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(1), 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, P., & Allen, M. (2001). Partnership as union strategy: A preliminary evaluation. Employee Relations, 23(2), 164–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heery, E., Kelly, J., & Waddington, J. (2003). Union revitalization in Britain. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 9(1), 79–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, D. C. (2007). Commentaries on industrial disputes act 1947. Labour Law Agency (LLA): Mumbai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (1998). Rethinking industrial relations: Mobilization, collectivism and long waves. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (2004). Social partnership agreements in Britain: Labor cooperation and compliance. Industrial relations: a journal of economy and society, 43(1), 267–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuruvilla, S., & Erickson, C. L. (2002). Change and transformation in Asian industrial relations. Industrial Relations, 42(2), 171–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankidy, J. (1995). Changing perspectives of worker participation in India with particular reference to the banking industry. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 33(3), 443–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, A. N. (1991). Industrial restructuring and union power. International Labour Organization-The Asian Regional Team for Employment Promotion (ILO-ARTEP): New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, A. N. (1992). Employment security and industrial restructuring in India. Paper presented at the National Seminar on Restructuring the Indian economy, 17–18 January, Calcutta.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D. (1988). Micromobilization contexts and recruitment to activism. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), 125–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Labour (NCL). (2002). Ministry of Labour, Government of India. Retrieved December 29, 2009, from www.labour.nic.in/lcomm2/nlc_report.html.

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (1996). The 1994 OECD jobs strategy. Paris: OECD. Retrieved July 20, 2010, from www.oecd.org/dataoecd/57/7/1868601.pdf.

  • Papola, T. S., Pais, J., & Sahu, P. P. (2007). Labour regulation in Indian industry: Towards a rational and equitable framework. Institute for Studies in Industrial Development (ISID): New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peccei, R., Bewley, H., Gospel, H., & Willman, P. (2005). Is it good to talk? Information disclosure and organizational performance. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(1), 11–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G. B. (2011). Approaches in comparative politics. In D. Caramani (Ed.), Comparative politics (pp. 1–6). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, E. A., & Schiphorst, F. B. (2000). Human resource management, trade unions and empowerment: two cases from India. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(4), 664–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, A. S. (2008, Nov–Dec). Axing regularization. Combat Law, 96–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reserve Bank of India website: www.rbi.org.in.

  • Saini, D. S. (2010). The Contract Labour Act 1970: Issues and concerns. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(1), 32–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen Gupta, A. K., & Sett, P. K. (2000). Industrial relations law, employment security and collective bargaining in India: Myths, realities and hopes. Industrial Relations Journal, 31(2), 144–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shyam Sundar, K. R. (2010). Industrial conflict in India: Is the sleeping giant waking up?. New Delhi: Bookwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shyam Sundar, K. R. (2012). Collective bargaining in India in the recent period: Matching efficiency and compensation concerns (Project Report). International Labour Organization-Decent Work Team/Country Office (ILO-DWT/CO): New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, G. (2008). Judiciary jettisons working class. Combat Law: The Human Rights and Law Bimonthly, 7(6), 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprenger, W., & van Klaveren, M. (2004). Boxing and dancing: Options in strategic choices for innovating trade unions. Paper for the 22nd International Labour Process Conference, 5–7 April, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakker, A. R. (2009). Labour law: Highlights of major labour enactments in India. Mumbai: Mill Mazdoor Welfare Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, L. (2004). Why revitalize? Labour’s urgent mission in a contested global economy. Cornell University, ILR School available at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2025&context=articles

  • Venkata Ratnam, C. S. (2003). Negotiated change: Collective bargaining, liberalization and restructuring in India. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2009). Doing business 2009 report. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan and World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2013). Global Competitiveness Report 2013–14. Retrieved August 29, 2013, from http://www.weforum.org/reports/global-competitiveness-report-2013-2014.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The funding for the study reported here was provided by the Nuffield Foundation (grant 37325) which is gratefully acknowledged. I am thankful to Mr. G. Gawade of INTUC for his cooperation with this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aston University, Birmingham, UK

    Vidu Badigannavar

Authors
  1. Vidu Badigannavar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vidu Badigannavar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Organizational Behaviour, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad Organizational Behaviour, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

    Ernesto Noronha

  2. Organizational Behaviour (OB), Indian Institute of Management Organizational Behaviour (OB), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

    Premilla D'Cruz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Badigannavar, V. (2017). The Paradoxes of Social Partnership and Union Revival in India. In: Noronha, E., D'Cruz, P. (eds) Critical Perspectives on Work and Employment in Globalizing India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3491-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3491-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3490-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3491-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation