Efficacy of Probiotic Supplemented Vermicompost on Germination, Growth, and Biochemical content of Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper

  • Ramasamy KarthiyayiniEmail author
  • Mani Rama Prabha


Vermicomposting is the most important environment and ecofriendly technique which is primarily used to produce wealth from waste. The study was conducted to evaluate the vermicompost-supplemented probiotics (Lactobacillus sporogenes and Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on seedling growth and leaf biochemical parameters of Vigna mungo plant. This study discovered that vermicomposting is one of the novel techniques used to get rid of the menace caused by organic wastes and vermicompost along with biofertilizers and has tremendous scope to wrest the present-day agriculture out of food and nutrition crisis.


  1. Alonso M, Rozados MJ, Vega JA, Perez-Gorostiaga P, Cuinas P, Fonturbel MT, Fernandes C (2002) Biochemical responses of Pinus pinaster trees to fire- induced trunk gridling and scorch: secondary metabolites and pigments as needle chemical indicators. J Chem Ecol 28:687–700CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arancon NQ, Lee S, Edwards CA, Atiyeh RM (2003) Effects of humic acids and aqueous extracts derived from cattle, food and paper-waste vermicomposts on growth of greenhouse plants. Pedobiologia 47:744–781Google Scholar
  3. Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts, polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–15CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Arun Kumar J (2004) Effect of vermicomposted sludge on growth of Amaranthus dubius. J Ecotoxicol Environ Monit 14:157–160Google Scholar
  5. Atiyeh RM, Lee S, Edwards CA, Arancon NQ, Metzger JD (2002) The influence of humic acids derived from earthworm-processed organic wastes on plant growth. Bioresour Technol 84(1):7–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bachman GR, Metzger JD (2008) Growth of bedding plants in commercial potting substrate amended with vermicompost. Bioresour Technol 99:3155–3161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bago B, Vierheilig H, Piche Y, Azcón-Aguilar C (1996) Nitrate depletion and pH changes induced by the extra radical mycelium of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices grown in monoxenic culture. New Phytol 133:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berg G (2009) Plant–microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84:11–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhawalkar US (1991) Vermiculture biotechnology for LEISA. Seminar on low external input sustainable agriculture, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhawalkar US, Bhawalkar UV (1993) Vermiculture biotechnology. In: Thampan PK (ed) Organics in soil health and crop production. Peekay Tree Crops Development Foundation, Cochin, pp 65–85Google Scholar
  11. Biswas S (2014) Evaluation of growth, yield and nutrient content with microbial consortia combined with different organic manures in Rumex acetosella L. IOSR J Environ Sci Toxicol Food Technol 8(11):01–05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bloemberg GV, Lugtenberg BJ (2001) Molecular basis of plant growth promotion and biocontrol by rhizobacteria. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4:343–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bradford MM (1976) A dye binding assay for protein. Anal Biochem 72:248–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chattopadhyay GN (2005) Vermicomposting as a biotechnological tool form recycling organic wastes. In: Ghosh TK, Chakrabarti T, Tripathi G (eds) Biotechnology in environmental management, vol 1. A.P.H. Publishing Corporation, New Delhi, pp 135–145Google Scholar
  15. Cooper KM (1984) Physiological of VA mycorrhizal. In: Powell CL, Bagyaraj DJ (eds) VA mycorrhiza. CRC Press, Inc, Boca Raton, pp 155–186Google Scholar
  16. Copper R (1979) Bacterial fertilizers in the Soviet Union. Soils Fertil 22:327–333Google Scholar
  17. Dell’Amico C, Masciandaro G, Ganni A, Ceccanti B, Garcia C, Hernandez T, Costa F (1994) Effect of specific humic fractions on plant growth. In: Senesi N, Miano TM (eds) Humic substance in the global environment and implications on human health. pp 563–566Google Scholar
  18. Dixit SP (1994) Effect of paddy straw management of soil fertility build up and yield of cowpea in wheat paddy cropping system in North West Himalayan soil. In: Proceedings and symposium on sustainability of rice-wheat system in India, KarnalGoogle Scholar
  19. Edwards CA, Burrows I (1988) The potential of earthworm compost as plant growth. SPB Acedemic Publishing, The Hague, pp 211–219Google Scholar
  20. Ellerbrock RH, Hoen A, Rogasik J (1999) Functional analysis of soil organic matter as affected by long-term manorial treatment. Eur J Soil Sci 50(1):65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Follet R, Donahue R, Murphy L (1981) Soil and Soil Amendments. New Jersey, Prentice Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Garcia C, Hernandez T, Costa F, Ceccanti B, Dell’Amico C (1992) Characterization of organic fractions of uncomposted and composted sewage sludge by isoelectric focusing and gel–filtration. Biol Fertil Soils 13:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Han J, Sun L, Dong X, Cai Z, Yang H, Wang Y, Song W (2005) Characterization of a novel plant growth-promoting bacteria strain Delftia tsuruhatensis HR4 both as a diazotroph and a potential biocontrol agent various pathogens. Syst Appl Microbial 28:66–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hemalatha B (2013) Comparative evaluation of biodegradability of yard waste and fruit waste with industrial effluents by vermicomposting. Int J Adv Eng Technol 2(2):36–39Google Scholar
  25. Jose S (2005) Effect of vermicompost on germinations and growth of tomoto and chili. M. Phil Dissertation, Bharathidasan University, TiruchirappalliGoogle Scholar
  26. Kale RD, Mallesh B, Hubra B, Bagyara DJ (1992) Influence of vermicompost application on the available macronutrients and selected microbial populations in a paddy field. Soil Biol Biochem 24:1317–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krishna KR, Bagyaraj DJ (1984) Growth and nutrient uptake of peanut inoculated with the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus fasciculatum compared with non-inoculated ones. Plant Soil 77:405–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kurian D, Vijayakumar K, Ramaswamy M (2008) Efficacy of EM–supplemented vermicompost of leaf litter using epigenetic earthworm, Eudrilus eugeniae (kinberg). Seminar on sustainable Aquaculture and rural Development (Bu-Aqua2008), Bharathiar University, CoimbatoreGoogle Scholar
  29. Lenin M, Dava Sena T, Thamizhiniyan P, Ravimycin T, Indira P (2012) Interaction of AM Fungi (Glomus intraradices) and vermicompost and their changes on biochemical content of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Var. VRIGn-7. Int J Curr Sci:37–47Google Scholar
  30. Levinish G (2011) Vermicompost treatment differentially affects seed germination, seedling growth and physiological status of vegetable crop species. Plant Growth Regul 65(1):169–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B, Garcia C (1997) Soil agro-ecological management: fertigation and vermicompost treatments. Bioresour Technol 59:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mathivanan AL, Chidambaram A, Sundaramoorthy P, Kalaikandhan R (2012) Effect of vermicompost on germination and biochemical constituents of ground nut (Arachis hypogaea. L.) seedling. Int J Res Biol Sci 2(2):54–59Google Scholar
  33. Muscolo A, Panuccio MR, Abenavoli MR, Concheri G, Nardi S (1999) Effect of molecular complexity acidity of earthworm faeces humic fractions on glutamate dehydrogenase, glutamine synthetase, and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in Daucus carota II cells. Biol Fertil Soils 22:83–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ndegwa PM, Thompson SA (2001) Integrating composting and vermicomposting the treatment and bioconversion of biosolids. Bioresour Technol 76:107–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Nelson LM (2004) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): prospects for new inoculants. Crop Manages. doi: 10.1094/CM-2004-0301-05-RV
  36. Owa SO, Moreyibi OH, Dedeke GA, Morafa SOA, Senjobi BA, Odunbaku OA, Aladesida AA (2008) Effect over seasoned earthworm products on seed germination, implication for early rain cropping. Appl Sci Res 4:638–687Google Scholar
  37. Parr F, Colacicco D (1987) Chapter 4: Organic materials as alternative nutrient sources. In: Helsel ZR (ed) Energy in plant nutrition and pest control. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, pp 81–99Google Scholar
  38. Pathak DV, Singh S, Saini RS (2013) Impact of bio-inoculants on seed germination and plant growth of guava (Psidium guajava). Global J Wood Sci Forest Wildl 1(1):015–017Google Scholar
  39. Rajendran P, Jayakumar E, Kandula S, Gunasekaran P (2008) Vermiculture and vermicomposting biotechnology for organic farming and rural economic development.
  40. Rodriquez H, Fraga R (1999) Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol Adv 17:319–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rout GR, Samantary S, Das P (2000) Effect of chromium and nickel on germination and growth in tolerant and non-tolerant populations of Echinochloa colona (L.) Link. Chemosphere 40:855–859CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Suthar S (2006) Impact of vermicompost and composted farmyard manure on growth and yield of garlic (Allium sativum L.) field crop. Int J Plant Prod 3(1):25–38Google Scholar
  43. Theunissen J, Ndakidemi PA, Laubscher CP (2010) Potential of vermicompost produced from plant waste on the growth and nutrient status in vegetable production. Int J Phys Sci 5(13):1964–1973Google Scholar
  44. Tomati U, Grappelli A, Galli E (1983) Fertility factors in earthworm humus. In: Proceedings of the international. symposium on agriculture and environment: prospects in earthworm farming, Publication Min. Ricera Sci. Technol., Rome, pp 49–56Google Scholar
  45. Umamaheswari S (2005) Vermicomposting of mango litters using earthworm Perionyx excavatus. J Ecotoxicol Monit 15(1):69–72Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BotanyAvinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for WomenCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Department of BotanyThiagarajar CollegeMaduraiIndia

Personalised recommendations