Skip to main content

Loan Intermediary Services: European Union

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
VAT and Financial Services
  • 577 Accesses

Abstract

In principle, loan intermediary services that are provided by banks and other financial institutions are not recognized as such in the European VAT system. Instead, the VAT regime follows a commercial law perspective and regards the granting of credit as the relevant supply; consequently, the full interest payment is considered to represent the consideration and thus constitutes the taxable amount. As a general rule, such granting of credit is exempt without credit. However, a few EU Member States allow their taxpayers to opt for taxation in B2B transactions, and the supply is moreover always zero-rated if the credit is granted to a third-country resident. To the extent that the exemption applies, it is to be construed broadly and it also covers most ancillary services. By contrast, the increasing trend to outsource credit processing is not properly reflected in the outdated European VAT legislation and will often result in prohibitive VAT burdens. Finance leases are treated as if they were ordinary (non-finance) leases for VAT purposes, i.e., the loan element is disregarded. In the case of direct loans, their treatment as an independent—exempt—supply depends on whether they are granted explicitly or merely implicitly, by increasing the price for the primary supply. In the former case, the exempt service will have no impact on the deductible pro rata if the granting of credit is merely incidental to the core business of the taxpayer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax [hereinafter VAT Directive].

  2. 2.

    Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes.

  3. 3.

    See also Commission Impact Assessment accompanying the Proposal for a Council Directive on a common system of financial transaction tax and amending Directive 2008/7/EC, 28 September 2011, SEC(2011) 1102 final, Vol. 4, p. 34, fn. 5.

  4. 4.

    Council Regulation (EC) No 1777/2005 of 17 October 2005 laying down implementing measures for Directive 77/388/EEC on the common system of value added tax [hereinafter VAT Implementing Regulation, as amended to date].

  5. 5.

    Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 282/2011 of 15 March 2011 laying down implementing measures for Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (recast); most recently amended by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 1042/2013 of 7 October 2013 as regards the place of supply of services.

  6. 6.

    EU Commission, Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax, as regards the treatment of insurance and financial services, COM(2007) 747 Final/2, 20 February 2008 [hereinafter Proposal for a Council Directive], p. 3.

  7. 7.

    See Proposal for a Council Directive; Proposal for a Council Regulation laying down implementing measures for Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax, as regards the treatment of insurance and financial services, COM(2007) 746 Final/2, 20 February 2008 [Proposal for a Council Regulation].

  8. 8.

    For an overview of developments since the proposals have been tabled until September 2010, see Terra (2010). The last debate in Council dates from June 2011.

  9. 9.

    In April 2016, the Commission has withdrawn the proposal, see OJ C 155 of 30 April 2016, p. 3. The Commision has informally announced to launch a new proposal in the foreseeable future, but has not as yet proceeded to do so.

  10. 10.

    See, for instance, CJEU 13 March 2014, case C-464/12, ATP PensionService, EU:C:2014:139, para. 40; settled case law.

  11. 11.

    See http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/taxation/vat/key_documents/vat_committee/index_en.htm.

  12. 12.

    See Opinion of AG Kokott 31 January 2013, case C-155/12, RR Donnelley Global Turnkey Solutions Poland, EU:C:2013:57, paras. 47 et seq.

  13. 13.

    See also Reiss (2003, pp. 363–364).

  14. 14.

    CJEU 21 June 2007, case C-453/05, Ludwig, EU:C:2007:369, para. 28.

  15. 15.

    See IBFD (2015, pp. 650–653).

  16. 16.

    Apparently due to the resistance of the financial sector itself, which finds the procedure administratively cumbersome and costly and does not want to be pressured (by business customers) to make use of it; see McCormick (2003, pp. 757–758).

  17. 17.

    See Proposal for a Council Directive, p. 3. For further explanations, see Commission Background Paper on the harmonisation of turnover taxes: Financial and Insurance Services, 5 March 2008. TAXUD/2414/08, pp. 9 et seq. [hereinafter Commission Background Paper].

  18. 18.

    See also Michie (2003, p. 53).

  19. 19.

    Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen 20 May 2010, case C-582/08, Commission/United Kingdom, EU:C:2010:286, para. 33. See also the explanatory memorandum to Art. 10 of the Proposal for a sixth Council Directive, on the harmonization of Member States concerning turnover taxes, COM(73) 950, 20 June 1973, Bulletin of the EC Supplement 1/73, p. 11.

  20. 20.

    CJEU 19 April 2007, case C-455/05, Velvet & Steel Immobilien, EU:C:2007:232, para. 24; see also CJEU 14 May 2008, joined cases C-231/07 and C-232/07, Ladbroke and Derby, EU:C:2008:275, para. 24.

  21. 21.

    CJEU 19 April 2007, case C-455/05, Velvet & Steel Immobilien, EU:C:2007:232, para. 24; 22 October 2009, case C-242/08, Swiss Re, EU:C:2009:647, para. 49.

  22. 22.

    See Michie (2003, pp. 51–52), and his reference to the 1973 Hutchings Report (Gérard Hutchings, Les opérations financières et bancaires et la taxe sur la valeur ajoutée, 1973).

  23. 23.

    Likewise Henkow (2008, p. 90).

  24. 24.

    See CJEU 7 July 2010, C-381/09, Curia, EU:C:2010:406, paras. 20–24, with further references.

  25. 25.

    See Proposal for a Council Regulation, Art. 3(1)(a): ‘loans, whether syndicated or not’.

  26. 26.

    For further details, see Rüdiger Philipowski, in Rau and Dürrwächter, Kommentar zum Umsatzsteuergesetz (loose-leaf commentary), § 4 Nr. 8, paras. 106 et seq.

  27. 27.

    See, for example, Bouchard et al. (2003, pp. 341–342), Fay and Hennigan (2003), p. 449), Loquet and Schaffner (2003, p. 555).

  28. 28.

    See 17 January 2013, case C-224/11, BGZ Leasing, EU:C:2013:15, paras. 39 et seq. For a stricter approach also in the context of insurance services in case of possible abuse see CJEU 21 February 2008, case C-425/06, Part Service, EU:C:2008:108, paras. 54 et seq.

  29. 29.

    See Proposal for a Council Regulation, Art. 3(2)(b).

  30. 30.

    See, for example, Bouchard et al. (2003, p. 324), McCormick (2003, p. 764). For a detailed explanation, see Rüdiger Philipowski, in Rau and Dürrwächter, Kommentar zum Umsatzsteuergesetz, § 4 Nr. 8, para. 52.

  31. 31.

    See also Proposal for a Council Regulation, Art. 3(1)(d): the definition of the ‘granting of credit’ shall cover ‘credit arrangements under which a person is entitled to dispose of funds up to a fixed amount’.

  32. 32.

    The expression ‘residual’ input VAT refers to input VAT that cannot be directly attributed to either taxed or exempt output supplies in case of a taxable person with mixed supplies; it is not fully congruent with the direct tax accountancy concept of overhead costs.

  33. 33.

    See also Kogels (2003, p. 34).

  34. 34.

    Cf. CJEU 1 July 1982, 222/81, BAZ Bausystem, EU:C:1982:256, paras. 10–11.

  35. 35.

    See, for example, Bouchard et al. (2003, p. 324). See also Art. 3(1)(d) of the Proposal for a Council Regulation: ‘The definition of the “granting of credit” … shall cover the provision of … credit arrangements under which a person is entitled to dispose of funds up to a fixed amount’; and the corresponding explanation in the Commission Background Paper, p. 21.

  36. 36.

    The Commission would apparently prefer to clarify that the provision of such services is exempt as a transaction concerning deposit or current account, see Art. 6(7) of the Proposal for a Council Regulation.

  37. 37.

    See Henkow (2008, p. 121).

  38. 38.

    See CJEU 25 May 1993, case C-18/92, Bally, EU:C:1993:212, paras. 9-11 and 16; 15 May 2001, case C-34/99, Primback, EU:C:2001:271, para. 29. The same applies when payment is made by way of interest-free credit offered by the seller and provided by a third party financial institution; see Primback, paras. 31–32.

  39. 39.

    See CJEU 15 May 2001, case C-34/99, Primback, EU:C:2001:271, paras. 38 et seq.

  40. 40.

    CJEU 2 December 2010, case C-276/09, Everything Everywhere, EU:C:2010:730, paras. 29–30.

  41. 41.

    See VAT Committee, Guidelines resulting from the 65th meeting of 19 June 2002, TAXUD/2390/02.

  42. 42.

    See CJEU 5 June 1997, case C-2/95, SDC, EU:C:1997:278, para. 66; 13 December 2001, case C-235/00, CSC, EU:C:2001:696, para. 25; 4 May 2006, case C-169/04, Abbey National, EU:C:2006:289, para. 70; 21 June 2007, case C-453/05, Ludwig, EU:C:2007:369, para. 27; 28 July 2011, case C-350/10, Nordea Pankki Suomi, EU:C:2011:532, para. 24; 7 March 2013, case C-275/11, GfBk, EU:C:2013:141, para. 21.

  43. 43.

    See CJEU 5 June 1997, case C-2/95, SDC, EU:C:1997:278, para. 38.

  44. 44.

    CJEU 13 December 2001, case C-235/00, CSC, EU:C:2001:696, para. 32; 28 July 2011, case C-350/10, Nordea Pankki Suomi, EU:C:2011:532, para. 31.

  45. 45.

    See CJEU 5 June 1997, case C-2/95, SDC, EU:C:1997:278, para. 66; 4 May 2006, case C-169/04, Abbey National, EU:C:2006:289, para. 71; 28 July 2011, case C-350/10, Nordea Pankki Suomi, EU:C:2011:532, para. 24. See also CJEU 3 March 2005, case C-472/03, Arthur Andersen, EU:C:2005:135, paras. 37 and 39, regarding mere ‘back office’ activities.

  46. 46.

    See Proposal for a Council Regulation, Art. 15. For further details, see Commission Background Paper, pp. 46 et seq.

  47. 47.

    This can be inferred from CJEU 20 November 2003, case C-8/01, Taksatorringen, EU:C:2003:621 paras. 58 et seq. See also the pending case C-616/15, Commission/Germany.

  48. 48.

    See PricewaterhouseCoopers (2006, p. 78).

  49. 49.

    See Proposal for a Council Directive, Art. 137b. For further details, see Commission Background Paper, pp. 13 et seq.

  50. 50.

    To the extent that input VAT incurred by a taxable person who carries out mixed supplies can be directly attributed to either taxed or exempt output supplies, an input VAT deduction (or its denial) is to be determined accordingly; i.e., only residual input VAT is subject to the pro rata; see CJEU 8 June 2000, case C-98/98, Midland Bank, EU:C:2000:300, para. 26.

  51. 51.

    For an overview, see Michie (2003, p. 69).

  52. 52.

    PricewaterhouseCoopers (2006, p. 202).

  53. 53.

    See VAT Committee, Guidelines resulting from the 13th meeting of 15–16 December 1981, XV/37/82. See also Mareels and Delmotte (2003, p. 189).

  54. 54.

    See CJEU 10 July 2014, case C-183/13, Banco Mais, EU:C:2014:2056, paras. 32–35.

  55. 55.

    See CJEU 27 October 1993, case C-281/91, Muys, EU:C:1993:855, para. 13; 22 October 2009, case C-242/08, Swiss Re, EU:C:2009:647, para. 46.

  56. 56.

    See Commission Background Paper, pp. 21–22. The Council has sought to state this explicitly in the Directive itself; see its latest compromise text on the Proposal for a Council Directive, Council Presidency Note, doc 14964/11 FISC 122, 30 September 2011, p. 3.

  57. 57.

    See Proposal for a Council Directive, Art. 135(1c): ‘Where the supply of goods or services includes the granting of credit which is not set out separately, the grant of credit shall not be a distinct service exempted under point (b) of paragraph 1’. See also Proposal for a Council Regulation, Art. 3(2)(a): ‘The definition of the “granting of credit” … shall not cover the following: (a) agreements under which payment by instalments, or an extended period for payment, is provided for in respect of the supply of goods or services…’.

  58. 58.

    See, for example, the following reports on Consumption taxation and financial services from the 2003 Congress of the International Fiscal Association: Michie (2003, p. 67), Haunold (2003, p. 147), Mareels and Delmotte (2003, p. 765). See also Commission Background Paper, pp. 20 and 23.

  59. 59.

    See CJEU 27 October 1993, case C-281/91, Muys, EU:C:1993:855, para. 18.

  60. 60.

    See CJEU 14 November 2000, case C-142/99, Floridienne and Berginvest, EU:C:2000:623, paras. 27–28 (but see also the qualifications in paras. 29 and 30: intra-group loans may also constitute an out-of-scope activity).

  61. 61.

    See CJEU 29 April 2004, case C-77/01, EDM, EU:C:2004:243, para. 75. Arguably, the Court has thereby implicitly overruled its prior judgment CJEU 11 July 1996, C-306/94, Régie dauphinoise, EU:C:1996:290, para. 22.

References

  • Bouchard, Jean-Claude, Grousset, Anne and Aldebert, Christophe, National Report - France, in: International Fiscal Association, Consumption taxation and financial services, Vol. LXXXVIIIb, Sydney Congress, 2003 (Sdu Uitgevers, The Hague) 319

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, John and Hennigan, William N., National Report - Ireland, in: International Fiscal Association, Consumption taxation and financial services, Vol. LXXXVIIIb, Sydney Congress, 2003 (Sdu Uitgevers, The Hague) 445

    Google Scholar 

  • Haunold, Peter, National Report - Austria, in: International Fiscal Association, Consumption taxation and financial services, Vol. LXXXVIIIb, Sydney Congress, 2003 (Sdu Uitgevers, The Hague) 145

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkow, Oskar, Financial Activities in European VAT: A Theoretical and Legal Research of the European VAT System and the Actual and Preferred Treatment of Financial Activities (Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • IBFD, EU VAT Compass 2015/2016 ([Annacondia, Fabiola ed.], IBFD Publications, Amsterdam, 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogels, Han A., General Report, in: International Fiscal Association, Consumption taxation and financial services, Vol. LXXXVIIIb, Sydney Congress, 2003 (Sdu Uitgevers, The Hague) 19

    Google Scholar 

  • Loquet, Erwan and Schaffner, Jean, National Report - Luxembourg, in: International Fiscal Association, Consumption taxation and financial services, Vol. LXXXVIIIb, Sydney Congress, 2003 (Sdu Uitgevers, The Hague) 539

    Google Scholar 

  • Mareels, Daniel and Delmotte, Philippe, National Report - Belgium, in: International Fiscal Association, Consumption taxation and financial services, Vol. LXXXVIIIb, Sydney Congress, 2003 (Sdu Uitgevers, The Hague) 175

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, Kevin, National Report - UK, in: International Fiscal Association, Consumption taxation and financial services, Vol. LXXXVIIIb, Sydney Congress, 2003 (Sdu Uitgevers, The Hague) 757

    Google Scholar 

  • Michie, George, European Union Report, in: International Fiscal Association, Consumption taxation and financial services, Vol. LXXXVIIIb, Sydney Congress, 2003 (Sdu Uitgevers, The Hague) 43

    Google Scholar 

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers, Study to Increase the Understanding of the Economic Effects of the VAT Exemption for Financial and Insurance Services, Final Report to the European Commission, 2 November 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Rau, Günter and Dürrwächter, Erich, Kommentar zum Umsatzsteuergesetz (Verlag Otto Schmidt, Köln)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, Wolfram, National Report - Germany, in: International Fiscal Association, Consumption taxation and financial services, Vol. LXXXVIIIb, Sydney Congress, 2003 (Sdu Uitgevers, The Hague) 351

    Google Scholar 

  • Terra, Ben, VAT and Financial Services – The Proposals for Change (ETIL, Lund, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Englisch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Englisch, J. (2017). Loan Intermediary Services: European Union. In: van Brederode, R., Krever, R. (eds) VAT and Financial Services. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3465-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3465-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3463-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3465-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics