Skip to main content

Using Reflective Practice to Foster Confidence and Competence to Teach Literacy in Primary Schools

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reflective Theory and Practice in Teacher Education

Part of the book series: Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices ((STEP,volume 17))

Abstract

Preparing tomorrow’s teachers calls for understanding of the changing literacy landscape heavily influenced by technological advancement, and the implications of this changing landscape for effective literacy pedagogy. Using reflective practice as a vehicle for learning this chapter explores perspectives of the preparedness of undergraduate pre-service teachers to teach literacy in primary schools through their engagement in process-orientated approaches to teaching and learning. It describes a community partnership model where the platform for learning through reflective practice is provided in authentic contexts. Policy and practice implications are discussed with an emphasis on the role of reflective practice in teacher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACARA. (2015b). ICSEA: Technical report. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/ICSEA_2015_technical_report.pdf

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2015a). Australian curriculum English. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/english/rationale

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership [AITSL]. (2011). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers/standards/list

  • Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. S. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, R. (2008). Powerful pedagogy: Self-study of a teacher educator’s practice. Germany: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(20), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2004). Practitioner inquiry, knowledge and university culture. In J. J. Loughran, M. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 601–649). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Australian Governments [COAG]. (2014). Schools and education: Reform agenda. Retrieved from https://www.coag.gov.au/schools_and_education#Improving%20Teacher%20Quality

  • Covey, S. (2004). The 8th habit. From effectiveness to greatness. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education United Kingdom [DfEUK]. (2011). Teachers’ standards: Guidance for school leaders, school staff and governing bodies. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/teachers-standards

  • Department of Education and Training. (2013). Innovation in education. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/support/Pages/innovatehere.aspx?Redirect=1

  • Education Council of Aotearoa New Zealand [ECANZ]. (2016, February 6). Graduating teacher standards. Retrieved from http://educationcouncil.org.nz/content/graduating-teacher-standards

  • Education Services Australia & AITSL. (2014). Literacy and numeracy standards. Retrieved from: http://www.aitsl.edu.au/initial-teacher-education/literacy-and-numeracy-standards.html

  • Gee, J. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. (2006). Reaching all by creating tribes learning communities. Windsor: Centre Source.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Florence: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, J. (2011). Rethinking english in an age of ‘standards-based reforms’: A report form the 2011 IFTE conference. English in Education, 45(3), 254–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honan, E. (2012). A whole new literacy: Teachers’ understanding of students’ digital learning at home. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(1), 82–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (2011). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3–4), 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keene, E. K., & Zimmerman, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought: Teaching comprehension in a reading workshop. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosnik, C. (2001). The effects of an inquiry oriented teacher education program on a faculty member: Some critical incidents and my journey. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 2(1), 65–80. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623940120035532

  • Krueger, R. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtman, M. (2013). Qualitative research in education. A user’s guide (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. (2007). Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the challenges, demands and expectations of self study. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. (2012). What expert teachers do: Enhancing professional knowledge for classroom practice. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C., Bianchi, L., McCullagh, J., & Kerr, K. (2013). Scaling up higher order thinking skills and personal capabilities in primary science: Theory-into-policy-into-practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razfar, A., & Gutiérrez, K. (2013). Reconceptualizing early childhood literacy: The sociocultural influence and new directions in digital and hybrid mediation. In J. Larson & J. Marsh (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of early childhood literacy (2nd ed., pp. 52–80). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446247518.n4.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reinking, D. (2010). An outward, inward, and school-ward overview of interactive communication technologies across the literacy landscape. In D. Wyse, R. Andrews, & J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of English, language and literacy (pp. 328–341). Oxen: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. M., Masciotra, D., & Boyd, N. (1999). Becoming-in-the-classroom: A case study of teacher development through co-teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 771–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. (2014). Introduction. In M. Jones & J. Ryan (Eds.), Successful teacher education. Partnerships, reflective practice and the place of technology (pp. 1–7). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple South.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (2008). The literacy wars: Why teaching children to read and write is a battleground in Australia. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (2003). What’s new in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group [TEMAG]. (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Retrieved from http://www.studentsfirst.gov.au/teacher-education-ministerial-advisory-group

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the support of The Smith Family in the regional Victorian community where these programs are conducted. Digi-Tell and Tell Tales could not operate without the generous support of The Smith Family staff.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen McLean .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McLean, K. (2017). Using Reflective Practice to Foster Confidence and Competence to Teach Literacy in Primary Schools. In: Brandenburg, R., Glasswell, K., Jones, M., Ryan, J. (eds) Reflective Theory and Practice in Teacher Education. Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices, vol 17. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3431-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3431-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3429-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3431-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics