Abstract
Preparing tomorrow’s teachers calls for understanding of the changing literacy landscape heavily influenced by technological advancement, and the implications of this changing landscape for effective literacy pedagogy. Using reflective practice as a vehicle for learning this chapter explores perspectives of the preparedness of undergraduate pre-service teachers to teach literacy in primary schools through their engagement in process-orientated approaches to teaching and learning. It describes a community partnership model where the platform for learning through reflective practice is provided in authentic contexts. Policy and practice implications are discussed with an emphasis on the role of reflective practice in teacher education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ACARA. (2015b). ICSEA: Technical report. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/ICSEA_2015_technical_report.pdf
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2015a). Australian curriculum English. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/english/rationale
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership [AITSL]. (2011). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers/standards/list
Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. London: Sage Publications.
Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. S. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Brandenburg, R. (2008). Powerful pedagogy: Self-study of a teacher educator’s practice. Germany: Springer.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(20), 77–101.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2004). Practitioner inquiry, knowledge and university culture. In J. J. Loughran, M. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 601–649). Dordrecht: Springer.
Council of Australian Governments [COAG]. (2014). Schools and education: Reform agenda. Retrieved from https://www.coag.gov.au/schools_and_education#Improving%20Teacher%20Quality
Covey, S. (2004). The 8th habit. From effectiveness to greatness. New York: Free Press.
Department for Education United Kingdom [DfEUK]. (2011). Teachers’ standards: Guidance for school leaders, school staff and governing bodies. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/teachers-standards
Department of Education and Training. (2013). Innovation in education. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/support/Pages/innovatehere.aspx?Redirect=1
Education Council of Aotearoa New Zealand [ECANZ]. (2016, February 6). Graduating teacher standards. Retrieved from http://educationcouncil.org.nz/content/graduating-teacher-standards
Education Services Australia & AITSL. (2014). Literacy and numeracy standards. Retrieved from: http://www.aitsl.edu.au/initial-teacher-education/literacy-and-numeracy-standards.html
Gee, J. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge.
Gibbs, J. (2006). Reaching all by creating tribes learning communities. Windsor: Centre Source.
Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Florence: Routledge.
Hodgson, J. (2011). Rethinking english in an age of ‘standards-based reforms’: A report form the 2011 IFTE conference. English in Education, 45(3), 254–263.
Honan, E. (2012). A whole new literacy: Teachers’ understanding of students’ digital learning at home. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(1), 82–98.
John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (2011). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3–4), 191–206.
Keene, E. K., & Zimmerman, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought: Teaching comprehension in a reading workshop. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Kosnik, C. (2001). The effects of an inquiry oriented teacher education program on a faculty member: Some critical incidents and my journey. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 2(1), 65–80. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623940120035532
Krueger, R. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Lichtman, M. (2013). Qualitative research in education. A user’s guide (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Loughran, J. (2007). Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the challenges, demands and expectations of self study. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 12–20.
Loughran, J. (2012). What expert teachers do: Enhancing professional knowledge for classroom practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
Murphy, C., Bianchi, L., McCullagh, J., & Kerr, K. (2013). Scaling up higher order thinking skills and personal capabilities in primary science: Theory-into-policy-into-practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 173–188.
Razfar, A., & Gutiérrez, K. (2013). Reconceptualizing early childhood literacy: The sociocultural influence and new directions in digital and hybrid mediation. In J. Larson & J. Marsh (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of early childhood literacy (2nd ed., pp. 52–80). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446247518.n4.
Reinking, D. (2010). An outward, inward, and school-ward overview of interactive communication technologies across the literacy landscape. In D. Wyse, R. Andrews, & J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of English, language and literacy (pp. 328–341). Oxen: Routledge.
Roth, W. M., Masciotra, D., & Boyd, N. (1999). Becoming-in-the-classroom: A case study of teacher development through co-teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 771–784.
Ryan, J. (2014). Introduction. In M. Jones & J. Ryan (Eds.), Successful teacher education. Partnerships, reflective practice and the place of technology (pp. 1–7). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple South.
Snyder, I. (2008). The literacy wars: Why teaching children to read and write is a battleground in Australia. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
Street, B. (2003). What’s new in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.
Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group [TEMAG]. (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Retrieved from http://www.studentsfirst.gov.au/teacher-education-ministerial-advisory-group
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to acknowledge the support of The Smith Family in the regional Victorian community where these programs are conducted. Digi-Tell and Tell Tales could not operate without the generous support of The Smith Family staff.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McLean, K. (2017). Using Reflective Practice to Foster Confidence and Competence to Teach Literacy in Primary Schools. In: Brandenburg, R., Glasswell, K., Jones, M., Ryan, J. (eds) Reflective Theory and Practice in Teacher Education. Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices, vol 17. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3431-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3431-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3429-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3431-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)