Skip to main content

Improving a School-Based Science Education Task Using Critical Reflective Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reflective Theory and Practice in Teacher Education

Part of the book series: Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices ((STEP,volume 17))

Abstract

This chapter outlines a self-study project I engaged in to examine and subsequently improve my teaching within a 4th-year, core science education unit for primary pre-service teachers (PSTs) at a regional university in Australia. The impetus for this study was tied to widely reported issues about the quality and quantity of science teaching in primary schools and my desire to provide the best science teacher education possible to help address these concerns. The initiative involved the design and implementation of a teaching, learning and assessment task that required small groups of PSTs to plan a mini-unit of science that they then taught in a classroom. PSTs had to report on children’s science learning and reflect on their own learning about science teaching. Quantitative and qualitative data collected from PSTs and from my personal reflections were analysed for statistical significance and key themes, respectively. Results show the potential for a school-based approach to science teacher education to better achieve a nexus between theory and practice; align teaching, learning and assessment in more meaningful ways; and allow for critical reflective practice that enhances both the teacher education experience and the learning achieved by PSTs.

How we teach is the message.

(Russell and Bullock 1999, p. 140)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In Australia, the primary years of schooling usually encompass the ages of about 5–12 years.

References

  • AITSL. (2011). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/apst-resources/australian_professional_standard_for_teachers_final.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. (2005). How do elementary teachers compensate for incomplete science content knowledge? Research in Science Education, 35, 245–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K. (2003). Pathways in professional development in primary science: extending science PCK. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Melbourne Australia, 10-12 July 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K., & Kindt, I. (1999). Why teach primary science? Influences on beginning teachers’ practices. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Academy of Science. (2009). Primary connections: An introduction. Department of Education, Science and Training and Australian Academy of Science. Retrieved from http://www.science.org.au/primaryconnections/images/intro-to-pc.pdf

  • Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (2nd ed.). Berkshire: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the observed learning outcome). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, R. B. (2000). Introduction to research methods (4th ed.). Frenchs Forest: Longman-Pearson Education Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W. (1989). Science and technology education for the elementary years: Frameworks for curriculum and instruction. Washington, DC: The National Centre for Improving Instruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEECD. (2007). The principles of learning and teaching (PoLT). Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/support/Pages/teaching.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education U.K. (2011). Teachers’ standards. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/283566/Teachers_standard_information.pdf

  • Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools: A research report. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs: Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackling, M., & Prain, V. (2005). Primary connections: Stage 2 research report. Canberra, Australia: Australian Academy of Science and Department of Education Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M., & Carter, G. (2007). Science teacher attitudes and beliefs. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1067–1103). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, J. (2010). Preparing pre-service primary teachers to teach primary science: A partnership approach. International Journal of Science Education, 32(10), 1267–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. (2001). Teacher education: A problematic enterprise in linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBoskey, V. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. Loughran, M. Hamilton, V. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Light, G., Cox, R., & Calkins, S. (2009). Learning and teaching in higher education: The reflective professional (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: in search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. (Ed.). (2004). International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. (2010). What expert teachers do: Enhancing professional knowledge for classroom practice. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, T., Cooksey, R., Panizzon, D., Parnell, A., & Pegg, J. (2006). Science, ICT and mathematics education in rural and regional Australia the SiMERR national survey: A research report. Armidale: Department of Education, Science and Training, National Centre of Science, ICT and Mathematics Education for Rural and Regional Australia, University of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D. (2015). An approach to the accreditation of initial teacher education programs based on evidence of the impact of learning teaching. Melbourne: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/initial-teacher-education-resources/ite-reform-stimulus-paper-1-mayer.pdf

  • National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2014). National board standards. Retrieved from http://www.nbpts.org/national-board-standards

  • Neary, M. (2002). Curriculum studies in post-compulsory and adult education: A teacher’s and student teacher’s study guide. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, K., & Kottkamp, R. (2004). Reflective practice for educators: Professional development to improve student learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, L. (2009). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide (2nd ed.). London: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. L., & Bullock, S. (1999). Discovering our professional knowledge as teachers: Critical dialogues about learning from experience. In J. Loughran (Ed.), Researching teaching: Methodologies and practices for understanding pedagogy (pp. 132–151). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samaras, A. (2010). Self-study teacher research: Improving your practice through collaborative inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, T. (2004). No time to waste: The vital role of college and university leaders in improving science and mathematics education. In: Teacher Preparation and Institutions of Higher Education: Mathematics and Science Content Knowledge, United States Department of Education, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skamp, K., & Mueller, A. (2001). Student teachers’ conceptions about effective primary science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K., & Mijung, K. (2012). Issues and challenges in science education research. In K. Tan & K. Mijung (Eds.), Issues and challenges in science education research: Moving forward (pp. 1–4). Dordecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • The General Teaching Council for Scotland [GTC]. (2012). The standards for registration: Mandatory requirements for registration with the General Teaching Council for Scotland. Retrieved from http://www.gtcs.org.uk/web/FILES/the-standards/standards-for-registration-1212.pdf

  • Tytler, R. (2002). School innovation in science (SIS). Focusing on teaching. Investigating, 18(3), 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mellita Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, M. (2017). Improving a School-Based Science Education Task Using Critical Reflective Practice. In: Brandenburg, R., Glasswell, K., Jones, M., Ryan, J. (eds) Reflective Theory and Practice in Teacher Education. Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices, vol 17. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3431-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3431-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3429-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3431-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics