Skip to main content

An Approach to Facilitate Coherent Concept Image Formation via Guided Reinvention

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emerging Practices in Scholarship of Learning and Teaching in a Digital Era

Abstract

This chapter presents an approach in mathematical teaching and learning that centers on facilitating student’s coherent concept image formation via guided reinvention. The key to forming a coherent concept image lies in the proper understanding of a particular concept. To do this effectively, instead of passively receiving a mathematical notion from a teacher, students take an active role to re-invent the mathematical notion for themselves. There are three general stages in this approach: (1) motivating; (2) investigative and exploring; and (3) reinventing. Three implementations of such an approach are presented in this chapter: (I) areas of closed figures and their formulas; (II) fractions addition and subtraction with different denominators; and (III) the rigorous definition of the limit of a sequence. Details and philosophy of the implementations will be summarized and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Carraher, D. W. (1996). Learning about fractions. In P. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 241–266). N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, T.-W., Kong, S. C., & Cheng, H. N. H. (2014). Learning environments in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 348–353). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, K. H. F., & Leung, A. Y. L. (2015). A dynamic applet for the exploration of the concept of the limit of a sequence. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(2), 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cory, B., & Garofalo, J. (2011). Using dynamic sketches to enhance preservice secondary mathematics teachers’ understanding of limits of sequence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(1), 65–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting Mathematics Education. China Lectures, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, S. C. (2008). The development of a cognitive tool for teaching and learning fractions in the mathematics classroom: A design-based study. Computers & Education, 51, 886–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, S. C., & Kwok, L. F. (2003). A graphical partitioning model for learning common fractions: Designing affordances on a web-supported learning environment. Computers & Education, 40(2), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, S. C., & Kwok, L. F. (2005). A cognitive tool for teaching the addition/subtraction of common fractions: A model of affordances. Computers & Education, 45(2), 245–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, S. C., & Kwok, L. F. (2002). Modeling a cognitive tool for teaching the addition/subtraction of common fractions. International Journal of Cognition and Technology, 1(2), 327–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kospentaris, G., Spyrou, P., & Lappas, D. (2011). Exploring student’s strategies in area conservation geometrical talks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(1), 105–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamona-Downs, J. (2001). Letting the intuitive bear on the formal: A didactical approach for the understanding of the limit of a sequence. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48, 259–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, N., & Naidoo, R. (2007). Using Blended learning to facilitate the mathematical thought process of primary school learners in a computer laboratory: A case study in calculating simple areas. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 4(7), 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roh, K. H. (2008). Students’ images and their understanding to definitions of the limit of a sequence. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(3), 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roh, K. H. (2010a). An empirical study of students understanding of a logical structure in the definition of limit via the ε-strip activity. Education Studies in Mathematics, 73, 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roh, K. H. (2010b). How to help students conceptualize the rigorous definition of the limit of a sequence. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 20(6), 473–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R. R. (1986). The psychology of learning mathematics (2nd ed.). Middlesex: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D. (1992). The transition to advanced mathematical thinking: Functions, Limits, Infinity and Proof. In Grouws D.A (ed.) Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, 495–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P. W. D., & Tawfeeq, D. A. (2011). Can a kite be a triangle? Bidirectional discourse and student inquiry in a middle school interactive geometric lesson. New England Mathematics Journal, 43, 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kell Hiu-Fai Cheng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cheng, K.HF., Kong, S.C. (2017). An Approach to Facilitate Coherent Concept Image Formation via Guided Reinvention. In: Kong, S., Wong, T., Yang, M., Chow, C., Tse, K. (eds) Emerging Practices in Scholarship of Learning and Teaching in a Digital Era. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3344-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3344-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3342-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3344-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics