Skip to main content

A Comparison of Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for Multi-level Longitudinal Data Using Monte-Carlo Simulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: ICSA Book Series in Statistics ((ICSABSS))

Abstract

Longitudinal investigations, where subjects are followed over time, have played an increasingly prominent role in medicine, health, and psychology in the last decades. This chapter will address inference for a two-level mixed model for a longitudinal study where observational units are clustered at both levels. Bootstrap confidence intervals for model parameters are investigated under the issues of non-normality and limited sample size of the original data. A one stage case-resampling bootstrap will be established for constructing confidence intervals by sampling clusters with replacement at the higher level. A two-stage case-resampling bootstrap will be developed by sampling clusters with replacement at the higher level and then sampling with replacement at the lower level also. Monte-Carlo simulations will be utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of these bootstrap methods with various size clusters for the mixed-effects model in terms of bias, standard deviation and confidence interval coverage for the fixed effects as well as for variance components of the random effects . The results show that the parametric bootstrap and cluster bootstrap at the higher level perform better than the two-stage bootstrap . The bootstrap methods will be applied to a longitudinal study of preschool children nested within classrooms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beale, E. M. L., & Little, R. J. A. (1975). Missing value in multivariate analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 37, 129–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, D. (2002). Performance of the parametric bootstrap method in small sample interval estimates. Advances and Applications in Statistics, 2(3), 269–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boos, D. (2003). Introduction to the bootstrap world. Statistical Science, 18(2), 168–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdick, R. K., & Graybill, F. A. (1988). The present status of confidence interval estimation on variance components in balanced and unbalanced random models. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods (Special Issue on Analysis of the Unbalanced Mixed Model), 17, 1165–1195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J. R. (2003). A novel bootstrap procedure for assessing the relationship between class size and achievement. Applied Statistics, 431–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demidenko, E. (2013). Mixed models: Theory and applications with R (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1987). Better bootstrap confidence interval. Journal of American Statistical Association, 82(397). Theory and Methods.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1986). Bootstrap of the mean in the infinite variance case. The Annals of Statistics, 724–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, C. A., Pang, Z., & Welsh, A. H. (2008). Bootstrapping data with multiple levels of variation. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 521–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, C. A. (2007). Bootstrapping clustered data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 369–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzmaurice, G. M., & Laird. N. (2004). Applied longitudinal analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harville, D. A. (1997). Maximum likelihood approaches to variance component estimation and to related problems. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72(358), 320–338.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1982). Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics, 38(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, H. D., & Thompson, R. (1971). Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika, 58, 545–54.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. (2000). Mixed-effects models for s and s-plus. New York: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Scherman, M., & Cessie, S. (1997). A comparison between bootstrap methods and generalized estimating equations for correlated outcomes in generalized linear models. Communications in Statistics, Simulation and Communication, 26, 901–925.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, S., McCullough, C., & Casella, G. (1992). Variance components. New York: Wiley.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shieh, Y. Y. (2002). The application of bootstrap methodology to multilevel mixed effects linear model under conditions of error term nonnormality. Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, Biometric Section (pp. 3191–3196). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thai, H. T. (2013). A comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimating uncertainty of parameters in linear mixed-effects models. Pharmaceutical Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. D., & Efron, B. (1996). Bootstrap confidence intervals. Statistical Science, 11(3), 189–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (2000). Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. New York: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, J., & Gray, S. (2011). Efficacy of the TELL language and literacy curriculum for preschoolers with developmental speech and/or language impairment. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 278–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Educational Sciences Grant R324A110048. The opinions expressed in this chapter are those of the authors and no official endorsement by the IES should be inferred.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Reiser .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reiser, M., Yao, L., Wang, X., Wilcox, J., Gray, S. (2017). A Comparison of Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for Multi-level Longitudinal Data Using Monte-Carlo Simulation. In: Chen, DG., Chen, J. (eds) Monte-Carlo Simulation-Based Statistical Modeling . ICSA Book Series in Statistics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3307-0_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics