Reputation Indicators of Participating Companies to United Nations Global Compact

  • Arzu Ozsozgun CaliskanEmail author
  • Emel Esen
Part of the Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application book series (AFSGFTA)


UN Global Compact initiative is a universally accepted set of principles that presented for businesses. The aim behind the principles is encouraging businesses to align their operations and strategies with committed values in the areas of human rights, labor, environment, and anti-corruption. It seems to be presented for business, but also governments, labor, civil society organizations could be part of this initiative. Compared to the past, stakeholders, especially customers, consider the results of business activities on the environment and society to buy firms’ services and goods. Companies that provide positive contributions to not only economy but also environment and society gain reputation in the eyes of their stakeholders, and reputation is the most important asset of today’s corporations in the construction of competitive advantages. The purpose of this study is to examine corporate reputation components of companies in Turkey that are the members of Global Compact initiative. For this study, a content analysis will be conducted to determine reputation practices by investigating companies.


UN Global Compact Reputation Automotive industry 


  1. Baumann-Pauly D, Scherer AG (2013) The organizational implementation of corporate citizenship: an assessment tool and its application at UNGC participants. J Bus Ethics 117 (1):1–17Google Scholar
  2. Caruana A, Michael TE (2010) How corporate reputation, quality, and value influence online loyalty. J Bus Res 63:1103–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chaudhry K, Krishnan VR (2007) Impact of corporate social responsibility and transformational leadership on brand community an experimental study. Glob Bus Rev 8(2):205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Enquist B, Johnson M, Skålén P (2006) Adoption of corporate social responsibility—incorporating a stakeholder perspective. Qual Res Account Manag 3(3):188–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Esen E (2013) The influence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on building corporate reputation. Adv Sustain Environ Justice 11:133–150Google Scholar
  6. Fombrun C, Foss C (2001) The gauge: Fombrun and Foss on measuring corporate reputation. Gauge Delahaye Medialink’s Newsl Worldw Commun Res 14:3Google Scholar
  7. Fombrun CJ, Gardberg N, Sever J (2000) The reputation quotient: a multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. J Brand Manag 7(4):241–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fritsch S (2008) The UN Global Compact and the global governance of corporate social responsibility: complex multilateralism for a more human globalisation? Glob Soc 22(1):1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fryxell G, Wang J (1994) The fortune corporate ‘reputation’ index: reputation for what. J Manag 20(1):1–14Google Scholar
  10. Gardiner L, Rubbens C, Bonfiglioli E (2003) Research: big business big responsibilities. Corp Gov 3(3):67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones MJ (2010) Accounting for the environment: towards a theoretical perspective for environmental accounting and reporting. Account Forum 34(2):123–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Keeler D (2002) Spread the love. Glob Finance 16(5):20–25Google Scholar
  13. Kell G, Ruggie JG (1999) Global markets and social legitimacy: the case of the ‘global compact’. Transnatl Corporations 8(3):101–120Google Scholar
  14. Nason RW (2008) Structuring the global impact, the impact of the United Nations Global Compact, 418–425Google Scholar
  15. Perez-Batres LA, Miller VV, Pisani MJ (2011) Institutionalizing sustainability: an empirical study of corporate registration and commitment to the United Nations Global Compact guidelines. J Clean Prod 19:843–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Porter ME, Kramer MR (2003) Corporate philanthropy: taking the high ground. Found Strategy Gr 13Google Scholar
  17. Rasche A (2009) A necessary supplement—what the United Nations Global Compact is and is not.
  18. Rasche A, Waddock S, Mcintosh M (2013) The United Nations Global Compact retrospect and prospect. Bus Soc 52(1):6–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reputation Quotient Ratings., 30 Aug 2015
  20. Ruggie JG (2001) Global-governance. net: the global compact as learning network. Glob Gov 7:371–378Google Scholar
  21. Runhaar H, Lafferty H (2009) Governing corporate social responsibility: an assessment of the contribution of the UN Global Compact to CSR strategies in the telecommunications industry. J Bus Eth 84(4):479–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Siltaoja ME (2006) Value priorities as combining core factors between CSR and reputation—a qualitative study. J Bus Eth 68(1):91–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Türkiye’deki Sektörlerin ve Şirketlerin İtibar Yönetimi Değerlendirmesi., 13 Aug 2014
  24. UNGC (2014a) United Nations Global Compact, UN Global Compact., 21 July 2014
  25. UNGC (2014b) How to Participate UN Global Compact., 21 July 2014
  26. Universal Decleration of Human Rights., 30 Aug 2015
  27. Wagner T, Lutz RJ, Weitz BA (2009) Corporate hypocrisy: overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. J Mark 73(6):77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wartick SL (2002) Measuring corporate reputation: definition and data. Bus Soc 41(4):371–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Whitehouse L (2003) Corporate social responsibility, corporate citizenship and the global compact a new approach to regulating corporate social power? Glob Soc Policy 3(3):299–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Williams OF (2007) The UN Global Compact: the challenge and the promise. Bus Eth Q 14(4):755–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. World’s Most Admired Companies., 30 Aug 2015

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business AdministrationYildiz Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations