Exploring Issues and Challenges of Green Financing in Malaysia: Perspectives of Financial Institutions

  • Azlan AmranEmail author
  • Mehran Nejati
  • Say Keat Ooi
  • Faizah Darus
Part of the Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application book series (AFSGFTA)


This research offers a better understanding of the green technology financing in Malaysia through investigation of major issues, challenges, and initiatives of a green technology financing scheme, as well as the perceived motivations and benefits of the scheme from the perspective of Malaysian banks. The method of analysis included qualitative approach comprising of round-table discussion (focus group) and open-ended surveys. The application of a multi-method design through the combination of various large players in the scheme, coupled with the higher amount of investment required for some areas of green technology, requires a funding capital which is beyond the limit currently supported by the government. The key drivers for Green Technology Financing Scheme (GTFS) by Malaysian banks were found to be related to secure financing packages, guarantees and support from the government, feasibility of the project falling within the financing criteria by the bank, interest subsidies obtained, and the sustainability agenda. Forty-nine percentage of bankers queried considers the applicants as the source of barriers for green technology financing. Moreover, the banks consider lack of project viability, lack of track record or success studies, and a lack of knowledge concerning green technology as the three major barriers to the success of green technology financing. The study also found that Malaysian banks do not consider green technology financing as a component of their CSR , while only 29% of them see the benefits of the scheme in terms of helping to expand their market share and enhancing their corporate image.


Green financing Green technology Sustainability Drivers Barriers Malaysia 


  1. Ahmad MM, Ali RM, Inayat A, Yusupa S (2011) Potential development of hydrogen production from biomass in Malaysia: a brief perspective. Int J 2(1):45–50Google Scholar
  2. Bassett R (2010) Time to catch up… qualitative research in child and adolescent psychiatry. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 19(1):2Google Scholar
  3. Basu K, Palazzo G (2008) Corporate social responsibility: a process model of sensemaking. Acad Manag Rev 33(1):122–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Climate Works Foundation (2010) From climate finance to financing green growth. Project Catalyst briefing paper. San Francisco, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  5. Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Mamingi N (2001) Pollution and capital markets in developing countries. J Environ Econ Manag 42(3):310–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DOE (2010) Quarterly DOE update on environment, development and sustainability: IMPAK, issue 3. Department of Environment, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  7. DSD (2011) Occupational structure. Green Technology Industry: Department of Skill Development, Ministry of Human Resources, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Economic Planning Unit (2010) 10th Malaysia plan, 2011–2015. Economic planning unit. Prime Minister’s Department, PutrajayaGoogle Scholar
  9. Economy Watch (2010) Banking industry. Accessed 10 July 2013
  10. EUMCCI (2012) EUMCCI trade issues and recommendations 2012. EU-Malaysia Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Kuala LumpurGoogle Scholar
  11. Gerster R (2011) Striking a balance ahead of Rio+20 in 2012. Sustainable finance: achievements, challenges, outlook. Gerster Consulting, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  12. Ismail AZ (2010) Development of national green technology. Ministry of energy, Green technology and water, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  13. KeTTHA (2011) Green technology financing scheme. Accessed 10 July 2013
  14. Labatt S, White RR (2002) Environmental finance: a guide to environmental risk assessment and financial products. WileyGoogle Scholar
  15. Lanoie P, Laplante B, Roy M (1998) Can capital markets create incentives for pollution control? Ecol Econ 26(1):31–41Google Scholar
  16. Malaysia SME (2010) Where is the green money? Accessed 10 July 2013, from
  17. Montgomery DB, Ramus CA (2003) Corporate social responsibility reputation effects on MBA job choice. A Research Note: Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  18. Mustapa SI, Leong YP, Hashim AH (2010) Issues and challenges of renewable energy development: a malaysian experience paper presented at the PEA-AIT. In: International conference on energy and sustainable development: issues and strategies (ESD 2010). Chiang Mai, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  19. Razak N (2009) Launch of green technology policy speech, 24 July 2009. Retrieved 22 July 2013, from
  20. Noh HJ (2010) Strategic approaches to develop green finance. Korea Capital Market InstituteGoogle Scholar
  21. Pfeffer J (2010) Building sustainable organizations: the human factor. Acad Manag Perspect 24(1):34–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rubin A, Babbie E (2005) Research methods for social work, 5th ed. Brooks/Cole-Thompson Learning, Belmont, CAGoogle Scholar
  23. Van der Heijden A, Driessen PP, Cramer JM (2010) Making sense of corporate social responsibility: exploring organizational processes and strategies. J Clean Prod 18(18):1787–1796Google Scholar
  24. Whitley R, Crawford M (2005) Qualitative research in psychiatry. Can J Psychiat 50(2):108–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Azlan Amran
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mehran Nejati
    • 2
  • Say Keat Ooi
    • 1
  • Faizah Darus
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate School of BusinessUniversiti Sains MalaysiaGelugorMalaysia
  2. 2.School of Business and LawEdith Cowan UniversityJoondalupAustralia
  3. 3.Accounting Research Institute & Faculty of AccountancyUniversiti Teknologi MARAShah AlamMalaysia

Personalised recommendations