Abstract
This research offers a better understanding of the green technology financing in Malaysia through investigation of major issues, challenges, and initiatives of a green technology financing scheme, as well as the perceived motivations and benefits of the scheme from the perspective of Malaysian banks. The method of analysis included qualitative approach comprising of round-table discussion (focus group) and open-ended surveys. The application of a multi-method design through the combination of various large players in the scheme, coupled with the higher amount of investment required for some areas of green technology, requires a funding capital which is beyond the limit currently supported by the government. The key drivers for Green Technology Financing Scheme (GTFS) by Malaysian banks were found to be related to secure financing packages, guarantees and support from the government, feasibility of the project falling within the financing criteria by the bank, interest subsidies obtained, and the sustainability agenda. Forty-nine percentage of bankers queried considers the applicants as the source of barriers for green technology financing. Moreover, the banks consider lack of project viability, lack of track record or success studies, and a lack of knowledge concerning green technology as the three major barriers to the success of green technology financing. The study also found that Malaysian banks do not consider green technology financing as a component of their CSR , while only 29% of them see the benefits of the scheme in terms of helping to expand their market share and enhancing their corporate image.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmad MM, Ali RM, Inayat A, Yusupa S (2011) Potential development of hydrogen production from biomass in Malaysia: a brief perspective. Int J 2(1):45–50
Bassett R (2010) Time to catch up… qualitative research in child and adolescent psychiatry. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 19(1):2
Basu K, Palazzo G (2008) Corporate social responsibility: a process model of sensemaking. Acad Manag Rev 33(1):122–136
Climate Works Foundation (2010) From climate finance to financing green growth. Project Catalyst briefing paper. San Francisco, California
Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Mamingi N (2001) Pollution and capital markets in developing countries. J Environ Econ Manag 42(3):310–335
DOE (2010) Quarterly DOE update on environment, development and sustainability: IMPAK, issue 3. Department of Environment, Malaysia
DSD (2011) Occupational structure. Green Technology Industry: Department of Skill Development, Ministry of Human Resources, Malaysia
Economic Planning Unit (2010) 10th Malaysia plan, 2011–2015. Economic planning unit. Prime Minister’s Department, Putrajaya
Economy Watch (2010) Banking industry. http://www.economywatch.com/banking. Accessed 10 July 2013
EUMCCI (2012) EUMCCI trade issues and recommendations 2012. EU-Malaysia Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Kuala Lumpur
Gerster R (2011) Striking a balance ahead of Rio+20 in 2012. Sustainable finance: achievements, challenges, outlook. Gerster Consulting, Switzerland
Ismail AZ (2010) Development of national green technology. Ministry of energy, Green technology and water, Malaysia
KeTTHA (2011) Green technology financing scheme. http://www.kettha.gov.my/en/content/green-technology-financing-scheme-gtfs. Accessed 10 July 2013
Labatt S, White RR (2002) Environmental finance: a guide to environmental risk assessment and financial products. Wiley
Lanoie P, Laplante B, Roy M (1998) Can capital markets create incentives for pollution control? Ecol Econ 26(1):31–41
Malaysia SME (2010) Where is the green money? Accessed 10 July 2013, from http://www.malaysiasme.com.my
Montgomery DB, Ramus CA (2003) Corporate social responsibility reputation effects on MBA job choice. A Research Note: Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CA
Mustapa SI, Leong YP, Hashim AH (2010) Issues and challenges of renewable energy development: a malaysian experience paper presented at the PEA-AIT. In: International conference on energy and sustainable development: issues and strategies (ESD 2010). Chiang Mai, Thailand
Razak N (2009) Launch of green technology policy speech, 24 July 2009. Retrieved 22 July 2013, from http://www.mylns.com.my/newsroom.php?id=2
Noh HJ (2010) Strategic approaches to develop green finance. Korea Capital Market Institute
Pfeffer J (2010) Building sustainable organizations: the human factor. Acad Manag Perspect 24(1):34–45
Rubin A, Babbie E (2005) Research methods for social work, 5th ed. Brooks/Cole-Thompson Learning, Belmont, CA
Van der Heijden A, Driessen PP, Cramer JM (2010) Making sense of corporate social responsibility: exploring organizational processes and strategies. J Clean Prod 18(18):1787–1796
Whitley R, Crawford M (2005) Qualitative research in psychiatry. Can J Psychiat 50(2):108–114
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Amran, A., Nejati, M., Ooi, S.K., Darus, F. (2018). Exploring Issues and Challenges of Green Financing in Malaysia: Perspectives of Financial Institutions. In: Çalıyurt, K., Said, R. (eds) Sustainability and Social Responsibility of Accountability Reporting Systems. Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3212-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3212-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3210-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3212-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)