Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

CSR Communication Through the Lens of New Media

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability and Social Responsibility of Accountability Reporting Systems

Abstract

In the age of new media , communication still remains the missing piece in the practice of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR ). Traditional media (ruled by one-way communication processes) have failed to promote an open and interactive communication process with different groups of stakeholders . Previous research has also shown that corporate websites have been poorly employed as strategic communication resource for CSR . However, new media (e.g., social media ) have changed how people interact and collaborate with each other. For instance, people are empowered through social media to demand more transparency about corporate operations that can impact society and environment. Today more than ever, thanks to the popularization of social platforms, companies must effectively communicate CSR with the purpose of building stakeholder relationships. But are companies ready to engage in CSR communication through new media ? In other words are they ready to invest in relationships? This chapter proposes a theoretical framework for CSR online communication (both through corporate websites and social media platforms) based on an extensive theoretical review in the area of CSR and Internet communication. This framework was applied through the implementation of a content analysis to 50 corporate websites of Fortune companies and 50 social media official profiles (Facebook and Twitter) of Fortune companies. Results of this analysis showed that companies were not employing these platforms to promote feedback and interactivity regarding CSR .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aras G, Crowther D (2011) Commentary: the view from management. In: Ihlen O, Barlett JL, May S (eds) The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. Wiley, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Basil D, Erlandson J (2008) Corporate social responsibility website representations: a longitudinal study of internal and external self-presentations. J Mark Commun 14(2):125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birth G, Illia L, Lurati F, Zamparini A (2008) Communicating CSR: practices among Switzerland’s top 300 companies. Corp Commun Int J 13(2):182–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branco MC, Rodrigues LL (2006) Communication of corporate social responsibility by Portuguese banks: a legitimacy theory perspective. Corp Commun Int J 11(3):232–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan LL, Johnson VE (2004) Technology management for corporate social responsibility. Technol Soc Mag IEEE 23(1):40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilic I (2010) Development of web corporate communications function by official web sites and value added ranking: case of Croatia. Bus Rev 15(1):151–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd DM (2009) Social media is here to stay… Now what? Microsoft Research TechFest. Online http://www.danah.org/papers/talks/MSRTechFest2009.html. Accessed 20 Nov 2012

  • Burkhardt P (2009) Social software trends in business: introduction. In Tiako P (ed) Software applications: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. Information Science Reference, Hershey, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Burson-Marsteller Communications Group (2010) The Global Social Media Check-up, white paper. http://www.bursonmarsteller.com/Innovation_and_insights/blogs_and_podcasts/BM_Blog/Documents/Burson-Marsteller%202010%20Global%20Social%20Media%20Check-up%20white%20paper.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2012

  • Capriotti P, Moreno A (2009) Communicating CSR, citizenship, and sustainability on the web. J Commun Manage 13(2):157–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhri V, Wang J (2007) Communicating corporate social responsibility on the internet. A case study of the top 100 information technology companies in India. Manage Commun Q 21(2):232–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther D (2002) The psychoanalysis of on-line reporting. In: Homes L, Grieco M, Hosking D (eds) Distributed technology, distributed leadership, distributed identity, distributed discourse: organizing in an information age. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Coope R (2004) Seeing the net potential of online CR communications. Corp Responsib Manage 1:25

    Google Scholar 

  • Coupland C (2005) Corporate social responsibility as argument on the web. J Bus Ethics 62(4):335–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Custom Communications (2010) SMI special report-social media sustainability index extract: an essential guide to how the world’s most sustainable companies are communicating their green convictions and deeds through social media

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins J (2005) Corporate responsibility: the communication challenge. J Commun Manage 9(2):108–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiStaso MW, Bortree DS (2012) Multimethod analysis of transparency in social media practices: survey, interviews and content analysis. Pub Relat Rev 38(3):511–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou W, Krishnamurthy S (2007) Using brand websites to build brands online: a product versus service brand comparison. J Advertising Res 47(2):193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du S, Bhattacharya CB, Sen S (2010) Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): the role of CSR communication. Int J Manage Rev 12(1):8–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esrock SL, Leichty GB (1998) Social responsibility and corporate web pages: self-presentation or agenda setting? Pub Relat Rev 24(3):305–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esrock SL, Leichty GB (1999) Corporate world wide web pages: serving the news media and other publics. J Mass Commun Q 76(3):456–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Esrock SL, Leichty GB (2000) Organization of corporate web pages: publics and functions. Pub Relat Rev 26(3):327–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough N (1995) Media discourse. Oxford University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Fieseler C, Fleck M, Meckel M (2010) Corporate social responsibility in the blogosphere. J Bus Ethics 91(4):599–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman-Hillard (2007) National consumers league study. rethinking corporate social responsibility. http://fleishmanhillard.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/csr_white_paper.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2011

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing Company, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Forehand MR, Grier S (2003) When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. J Consum Psychol 13(3):349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GRI G3 Guidelines (2009) Global reporting initiative sustainability report. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-Sustainability-Report-2009-2010.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2016

  • Golob U, Bartlett JL (2007) Communicating about corporate social responsibility: a comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Pub Relat Rev 33(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez L, Chalmeta R (2011) Corporate responsibility in U.S. corporate websites: a pilot study. Pub Relat Rev 37(1):93–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez L (2013) Me gusta o te sigo: Análisis de la comunicación de prácticas de Responsabilidad Social Corporativa a través de los medios sociales. Correspondencias Análisis 3:89–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig JE, Hunt T (1984) Managing public relations. Harcourt Brace Jovanich, Orlando, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig JE (2009) Paradigms of global public relations in an age of digitalization. Prism 6(2):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn G, Foth M, Gray H (2009) Applications and implementations of new media in corporate communications. An action research approach. Corp Commun Int J 14(1):49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AL, Palen L (2009) Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events. Int J Emerg Manage 6(3/4):248–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihlen O, Barlett JL, May S (2011) Corporate social responsibility and communication. In: Ihlen O, Barlett JL, May S (eds) The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. Wiley, Oxford

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Isenmann R (2006) CSR online: internet based communication. In: Jonker J, White M De (eds) Management models for corporate social responsibility. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones B, Temperley J, Anderson L (2009) Corporate reputation in the era of Web 2.0. The case of primark. J Mark Manage 25(9–10):927–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent ML, Taylor M (1998) Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web. Pub Relat Rev 24(3):321–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent ML, Maureen T, White WJ (2003) The relationship between website design and organizational responsiveness to stakeholders. Pub Relat Rev 29(1):63–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy K, Saxton GD (2012) Information, community, and action: how nonprofit organizations use social media. J Comput Mediated Commun 17(3):337–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundquist (2010) CSR online awards survey 2010: time to get real-time and personal. Recuperado de http://www.lundquist.it/research/ Accessed 1 Dec 2011

  • Mangold G, Faulds D (2009) Social media: the new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Bus Horiz 52:357–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan I, Ralston D (2002) Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: insights from businesses self-presentations. J Int Bus Stud 33(3):497–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda FJ, Sanguino R, Bañegil TM (2009) Quantitative assessment of European municipal web sites. Developing and use of an evaluation tool. Internet Res 19(4):425–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing M, Schultz M (2006) Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response, and involvement strategies. J Bus Ethics 15(4):323–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing M, Schultz M, Nielsen K (2008) The catch 22 of communicating CSR: findings from a Danish study. J Mark Commun 14(2):97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen (2011) State of the media: the social media report Q3 2011. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/social/. Accessed 14 Aug 2012

  • Paine KD (2011) Measure what matters. online tools for understanding customers, social media, engagement, and key relationships. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollach I (2003) Communicating corporate ethics on the world wide web: a discourse analysis of selected company websites. Bus Soc 42(2):277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roddick A (2000) Business as unusual. Thorsons, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins SS, Stylianou AC (2003) Global corporate web sites: an empirical investigation of content and design. Inf Manage 40(3):205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolland D, Bazzoni JO (2009) Greening corporate identity: CSR online corporate identity reporting. Corp Commun Int J 14(3):249–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rybalko S, Seltzer T (2010) Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: how fortune 500 companies engage stakeholders using twitter. Pub Relat Rev 36(4):336–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider AM, Stieglitz S, Lattemann C (2007) Social software as an instrument of CSR. Proceedings of ICT, transparency and social responsibility, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Snider J, Hill RP, Martin D (2003) Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: a view from the world’s most successful firms. J Bus Ethics 48 (2):175–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetser KD (2010) A losing strategy: the impact of nondisclosure in social media on relationships. J Pub Relat Res 22(3):288–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang L, Li H (2009) Corporate social responsibility communication of Chinese and global corporations in China. Pub Relat Rev 35:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor M, Kent ML, White WJ (2001) How activist organizations are using the Internet to build relationships. Pub Relat Rev 27:263–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thackeray R, Neiger BL, Hanson CL, McKenzie JF (2008) Enhancing promotional strategies within social marketing programs: use of web 2.0 social media. Health Promot Pract 9(4):338–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanderley LSO, Lucian R, Farache F, Sousa Filho JM (2008) CSR information disclosure on the web: a context-based approach analyzing the influence of country of origin and industry sector. J Bus Ethics 82(2):369–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters R, Burnett E, Lamm A, Lucas J (2009) Engaging stakeholders through social networking: how nonprofits organizations are using facebook. Pub Relat Rev 35(2):102–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeier S, Schultz F (2011) Communication and corporate social responsibility. a storytelling perspective. In: Ihlen O, Barlett JL, May S (eds) The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. Wiley, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams SM, Ho Wern Pei C (1999) Corporate social disclosures by listed companies on their web sites: an international comparison. Int J Acc 34(3):389–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright DK (1998) Corporate communications policy concerning the Internet: a survey of the nation’s senior-level, corporate public relations officers. The Institute for Public Relations, Gainesville, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright DK (2001) The magic communication machine: examining the internet’s impact on public relations, journalism, and the public. The Institute for Public Relations, Gainesville, FL

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidad del Este, Puerto Rico, USA

    Lina M. Gomez

Authors
  1. Lina M. Gomez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lina M. Gomez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey

    Kıymet Tunca Çalıyurt

  2. Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kedah, Malaysia

    Roshima Said

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gomez, L.M. (2018). CSR Communication Through the Lens of New Media. In: Çalıyurt, K., Said, R. (eds) Sustainability and Social Responsibility of Accountability Reporting Systems. Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3212-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation