Skip to main content

Interval Type-2 Mamdani Fuzzy Inference System for Morningness Assessment of Individuals

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence and Evolutionary Computations in Engineering Systems

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 517))

Abstract

From the view point of revealing different preferences among the individuals, the assessment of individual typology, i.e., chronotype, is increasing largely in the recent past. Chronotype, recognized as a human attribute, is usually studied by self-reported instruments designed to find individual time of preference for daily activities in an easy manner. One of the criticisms of using these self-reported instruments includes the fact that total scores may not always reflect the actual chronotype of an individual. On the other hand, linguistic terms are used to address some of the items of these self-reported questionnaires. In this paper, an interval valued type-2 Mamdani fuzzy inference system has been proposed to assess chronotype of an individual. An illustrative case example is discussed for validation of the proposed model in the field chronobiology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Saksvik I, Bjorvatn B, Hetland H, Sandal GM, Pallesen S. (2010). Individual differences in tolerance to shift work – a systematic review. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 15:221–235.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Selvi FF, Karakaş SA, Boysan M, Selvi Y. (2015). Effects of shift work on attention deficit, hyperactivity, and impulsivity, and their relationship with chronotype, Biological Rhythm Research. 46(1):53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Facer-Childs E, Brandstaetter R. (2015). The impact of circadian phenotype and time since awakening on diurnal performance in athletes. Current Biology. 25(4):518–22.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thun F, Bjorvatn B, Flo E, Harris A, Pallesen S. (2015). Sleep, circadian rhythms, and athletic performance. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 23:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor DJ, Clay KC, Bramoweth AD, Sethi K, Roane BM. (2011). Circadian phase preference in college students: relationship with psychological functioning and academics. Chronobiology International. 28:541–547.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bohle P. (1989). The impact of night work on psychological wellbeing. Ergonomics. 32:1089–1099.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mecacci, L, & Rocchetti, G. (1998). Morning and evening types: Stress related personality aspects. Personality and Individual Difference. 25(3), 537–542.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Emens JS, Yuhas K, Rough J, Kochar N, Peters D, Lewy AJ. (2009). Phase angle of entrainment in morning and evening types under naturalistic conditions. Chronobiology International. 26:474–493.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Adan A, Lachica J, Caci H, Natale V. (2010). Circadian typology and temperament and character personality dimensions. Chronobiology International. 27:181–193.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Selvi Y, Aydin A, Boysan M, Atli A, Agargun MY, Besiroglu L. (2010). Associations between chronotype, sleep quality, suicidality, and depressive symptoms in patients with major depression and healthy controls. Chronobiology International. 27:1813–1828.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Horne JA, Ostberg O. (1976). A self assessment questionnaire to determine morningness, eveningness. International Journal of Chronobiology. 4:97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Folkard S, Monk TH, Lobban MC. (1979). Toward a predictive test of adjustment to shift work. Ergonomics. 22:79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith CS, Reilly C, Midkiff K. (1989). Evaluation of three circadian rhythm questionnaires with suggestions for an improved measure of morningness. Journal of Applied Psychology. 74:728–738.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Adan A, Almirall H. (1991). Horne & Ostberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire: a reduced scale. Personality and Individual Differences. 12:241–53.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Caci H, Deschaux O, Adan A, Natale V. (2009). Comparing three morningness scales: age and gender effects, structure and cutoff criteria. Sleep Medicine. 10:240–245.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zadeh LA. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control. 8(3):338–353.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zadeh LA. (1975a). Fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning. Synthese. 30:407–428.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zadeh LA. (1976). A fuzzy-algorithmic approach to the definition of complex or imprecise concepts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 8:249–291.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zadeh LA. (2008). Is there a need for fuzzy logic? Information Sciences. 178:2751–2779.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bezdek JC, Pal SK. (1992). Fuzzy Models for Pattern Recognition. IEEE Press, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Übeyli ED, Güler İ. (2005). Automatic detection of erythemato-squamous diseases using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems. Computers in Biology and Medicine. 35(5):421–33.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Palma J,  Juarez JM,  Campos M, Marin R. (2006). Fuzzy theory approach for temporal model-based diagnosis: An application to medical domains. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 38(2): 197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dubois D, Prade H. (1980). Fuzzy Sets and Systems. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zimmermann HJ. (1985). Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Biswas, A., Majumder, D., & Sahu, S. (2011). Assessing Morningness of a Group of People by Using Fuzzy Expert System and Neuro Fuzzy Inference Model. Communications in Computer and Information Science. 140:47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Biswas A, Adan A, Haldar P, Majumder D, Natale V, Randler C, Tonetti L, Sahu S. (2014). Exploration of transcultural properties of the reduced version of the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (rMEQ) using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system. Biological Rhythm Research. 45(6):955–968.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Biswas A, Majumder D. (2014). Genetic algorithm based hybrid fuzzy system for assessing morningness. Advances in Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Moharrer, M., Tahayori, H., Sadeghian, A. (2013). Modeling complex concepts with type-2 fuzzy sets: the case of user satisfaction of online services. Sadeghian, A., Mendel, J.M., Tahayori, H. (Eds.), Advances in Type-2 Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. 301:133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mendel, JM. (2007). Computing with words and its relationships with fuzzistics. Information Sciences. 177:988–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pedrycz, W. (2010). Human certainty in computing with fuzzy sets: an interpretability quest for higher order granular constructs. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. 1:65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mendel JM. (1999). Computing with words when words can mean different things to different people. In: Int’l. ICSC Congress on Computational Intelligence: Methods & Applications, Third Annual Symposium on Fuzzy Logic and Applications, Rochester, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liang Q and Mendel JM. (2000). Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems: theory and design. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 8(5):535–550.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zadeh LA. (1975b). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Information Sciences. 8:199–249.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mendel JM. (2001). Uncertain Rule-Based Fuzzy Logic Systems: Introduction and New Directions, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Liang Q, Karnik NN, Mendel JM. (2000). Connection admission control in ATM networks using survey-based type-2 fuzzy logic systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, Cybernetics, C, (Applications and Review). 30(3):329–339.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Melgarejo MC, Reyes AP, Garcia A. (2004). Computational model and architectural proposal for a hardware type-2 fuzzy system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE FUZZ Conference, Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Melin P, Castillo O. (2004). A new method for adaptive control of nonlinear plants using type-2 fuzzy logic and neural networks. International Journal of General Systems. 33:289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wu D, Tan W. (2004). A type-2 fuzzy logic controller for the liquid-level process. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wagner C, Hagras H. (2007). A genetic algorithm based architecture for evolving type-2 fuzzy logic controllers for real world autonomous mobile robots, In: Proceedings of the IEEE FUZZ Conference, pp. 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zeng J, Liu ZQ. (2015). Type-2 Fuzzy Graphical Models for Pattern Recognition, Studies in Computational Intelligence. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mendel JM, John RI, Liu F. (2006). Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems Made Simple. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 14(6):808–821.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Baklouti N, Alimi A. (2007). Motion planning in dynamic and unknown environment using an interval type-2 TSK fuzzy logic controller. In: Proceedings of the IEEE FUZZ Conference. 1848–1853.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lin T, Liu H, Kuo M. (2009). Direct adaptive interval type-2 fuzzy control of multivariable nonlinear systems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 22:420–430.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Biglarbegian M, Melek W, Mendel J. (2011). On the robustness of type-1 and interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems in modeling. Information Sciences. 181:1325–1347.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Linda O, Manic M. (2011). Interval Type-2 fuzzy voter design for fault tolerant systems. Information Sciences. 181:2933–2950.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lee LW, Chen SM. (2008). A new method for fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the arithmetic operations of interval type-2 fuzzy sets. In: Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on machine learning and cybernetics, China: Kunming. 3084–3089.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Karnik NN, Mendel JM. (2001). Centroid of a type-2 fuzzy set. Information Sciences. 132(1–4):195–220.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mendel JM, Wu H. (2007). New results about the centroid of an interval type-2 fuzzy set, including the centroid of a fuzzy granule. Information Sciences. 177: 360–377.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mamdani EH. (1974). Applications of fuzzy algorithms for simple dynamic plant. In: Proceedings of the IEEE. 121:1585–1588.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Huang C, Moraga C. (2005). Extracting fuzzy if–then rules by using the information matrix technique. Journal of Computer and System Sciences. 70(1):26–52.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Mendel JM, Liu F. (2007). Super-exponential convergence of the Karnik-Mendel algorithms for computing the centroid of an interval type-2 fuzzy set. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 15(2):309–320.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Mendel JM, Wu D. (2010). Perceptual Computing: Aiding People in Making Subjective Judgments. Wiley-IEEE Press, Hoboken.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sahu S. (2009). An Ergonomic Study on Suitability of Choronotypology Questionnaires on Bengalee (Indian) Population. Indian Journal of Biological Sciences. 15:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors remain grateful to Dr. S. Sahu, Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, India for his kind support and expert suggestions in developing the model. The authors are thankful to the reviewers for their valued comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Animesh Biswas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Majumder, D., Debnath, J., Biswas, A. (2017). Interval Type-2 Mamdani Fuzzy Inference System for Morningness Assessment of Individuals. In: Dash, S., Vijayakumar, K., Panigrahi, B., Das, S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Evolutionary Computations in Engineering Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 517. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3174-8_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3174-8_57

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3173-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3174-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics