Skip to main content

Wittgenstein and Classical Pragmatism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Companion to Wittgenstein on Education

Abstract

My paper compares Wittgenstein to the three classical pragmatist, Charles Sanders Peirce, William James , and John Dewey . It is well known that Frank Ramsey read and cited Peirce, although we can only conjecture what, if anything, he may have communicated of Peirce to Wittgenstein or if Wittgenstein ever read him for himself. Through Ramsey, we will explore some of the similarities between Wittgenstein and Peirce, including the typically pragmatist emphasis on intelligent action and its relation to doubt. One important difference is Peirce and pragmatism’s emphasis on embodied habits. We will also examine the well-documented influence of James on Wittgenstein. Many of Wittgenstein’s criticisms of psychology can most likely be traced to errors he initially found in James. However, there are many likely sources of positive influence on Wittgenstein as well including perhaps the notion of an inherited world picture, his unique theory of universals along with his holism, historicism, and anti-foundationalism . While Wittgenstein has many positive things to say about James , he is entirely negative in his remarks about Dewey. Ironically, we will find that Dewey is the pragmatist with whom most commentators have identified thematic resonances to Wittgenstein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Following convention, titles for Wittgenstein’s works are abbreviated (TLP = Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, PI = Philosophical Investigations, Z = Zettel, OC = On Certainty, LR = Letters to Russell, keynes, and moore, RFM = Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, CV = Culture and Value, L = Lectures), with section (§) or page number (p.), with full citation and initials (e.g., RFM) in the References.

  2. 2.

    Peirce is here rejecting Kantian transcendentalism.

  3. 3.

    It would be interesting to compare Peirce’s “speculative grammar” as the division of his logic dealing with “the general conditions to which thought or signs of any kind must conform in order to assert anything” (CP: §206) to what Wittgenstein means by “grammar.”

  4. 4.

    Nowhere has emphasis been added to any citation.

  5. 5.

    This passage also connects to Peirce and Wittgenstein’s anti-foundationalism.

  6. 6.

    While they concede, we cannot complete the quest for certainty , pragmatists are anti-skeptics that consider skepticism an impregnable fortress from whence the enemy cannot attack. If they do, they lose.

  7. 7.

    Goodman (2002: 3). Goodman provides many instances of Wittgenstein referring directly to James in his correspondence or remembrances published by friends and students or, as here, letters. This is the definitive work on the many likely influences of James on Wittgenstein.

  8. 8.

    Of course, we may perform the activity of taking and using signs reflexively. It is worth adding that entire body performs such activity.

  9. 9.

    Some believe this essay was the most important single philosophical paper of the twentieth century. According to Quine (1953), pragmatism is one of the major effects of rejecting the two dogmas.

  10. 10.

    1939.07.22 (09313): John Dewey to Corinne Chisholm Frost.

  11. 11.

    Instead, logical properties emerge from biological and social functioning and when they do they transform such functioning.

  12. 12.

    Wittgenstein could have derived this metaphor from James’s chapter on “The Stream of Consciousness” in Principles.

  13. 13.

    Wittgenstein writes: “When I think in language , there aren’t ‘meanings ’ going though my mind in addition to the verbal expressions : the language is itself the vehicle of thought” (PI §329). Linguistic behavior is irreducible to psychic mental functioning, although there are no doubt neurophysiological concomitants including linguistic habits.

  14. 14.

    Quine’s quotes are from (LW 1, 1925), but he had already shown the primacy of socially coordinated action (i.e., behavior) at least as early as 1916.

  15. 15.

    Skinnerian and earlier forms of behaviorism cannot account for linguistic behavior.

References

  • Bouwsma, O. K. (1986). Wittgenstein: Conversations, 19491951. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2003). The later works, 1925–1953. In Jo Ann Boydston (Ed.), The collected works of John Dewey, 1882–1953, (Vol. 4: 1929). Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1871–1952). References to correspondence are to The correspondence of John Dewey, 1871–1952 (I–IV). Electronic Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. B. (2002). Wittgenstein and William James. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. References are to The works of William James (17 Vols.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: Principles of psychology (3 Vols.) (1890/1981). The third volume is a compendium (PP I and II). Varieties of religious experience (1902/1985) (VRE). Pragmatism (1907/1975) (P). A Pluralistic Universe (1909/1977) (PU). “Percept and concept” In Some problems of philosophy (1911/1979) (PC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nubiola, J. (1996). Scholarship on the relations between Ludwig Wittgenstein and Charles S. Peirce. In I. Angelelli & M. Cerezo (Eds.), Proceedings of the III symposium on history of logic. Gruyter: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, C. K., & Richards, I. A. (1923/1989). The meaning of meaning. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. References are to The essential Peirce (2 Vols.) (Indiana University Press, 1992, 1998). Page numbers follow the volume number in EP references. All other references are to the Collected papers of Charles S. Peirce (8 Vols.) (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931–58). Paragraph numbers follows the volume number in CP references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. (1953). Two dogmas of empiricism. In From a logical point of view (pp. 20–46). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. (1969). Ontological relativity. In W. V. Quine (Ed.), Ontological relativity and other essays (pp. 26–68). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P. (1923/2013). Critical notice of L. Wittgenstein’s “Tractatus logico-philosophicus.” In R. B. Braithwaite (Ed.), The foundations of mathematics. Mansfield Centre, CT: Martino Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P. (1926/1990). Truth and probability. In D. H. Mellor (Ed.), Philosophical papers F.P. Ramsey. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P. (1929/1990). General propositions and causality. In D. H. Mellor (Ed.), Philosophical papers F.P. Ramsey. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1974). Wittgenstein and idealism. In G. Vesey (Ed.), Understanding Wittgenstein. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & Company (TLP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: The Macmillan Company (PI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Zettel. (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell (Z).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1972). On certainty. New York: Harper & Row (OC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1974). Letters to Russell, Keynes and Moore (G. H. von Wright assisted by B. F. McGuinness, Eds.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell (LRKM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1978). Remarks on the foundations of mathematics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell (RFM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Culture and value. (G. H. von Wright Ed., in collaboration with H. Nyman and P. Winch, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell (CV).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1988). Wittgenstein’s lectures on philosophical psychology 1946–47, notes by P. T. Geach, K. J. Shah & A. C. Jackson; P.T. Geach (Ed.). Hassocks: Harvester Press (LPP).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jim Garrison .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garrison, J. (2017). Wittgenstein and Classical Pragmatism. In: Peters, M., Stickney, J. (eds) A Companion to Wittgenstein on Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3136-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3136-6_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3134-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3136-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics