Abstract
The computational inverse technique-based high-fidelity numerical modeling is a comprehensive analysis of the experimental data and the numerical simulation model instead of a simple modeling analysis process or an optimal iteration process. Appropriate physical experiments are required to ensure the relatively strong sensitivity between the measured responses and the modeling parameters, while the numerical solution is expected to be available. In addition, the identification of the model parameters should address three problems, i.e., high computational intensity and the ill-posedness of the system, improvement for the identification efficiency and stability and the optimality of the solution to a specific extent.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Liu, G. R., & Han, X. (2003). Computational inverse techniques in nondestructive evaluation. Florida: CRC Press.
Tarantola, A., & Valette, B. (1982). Generalized nonlinear inverse problems solved using the least squares criterion. Reviews of Geophysics, 20(2), 219–232.
Aster, R. C., Borchers, B., & Thurber, C. H. (2011). Parameter estimation and inverse problems. Academic Press.
Engl, H. W., Hanke, M., & Neubauer. A. (1996). Regularization of inverse problems. Springer Science & Business Media.
Tikhonov, A. N., Arsenin, V. I. A., & John, F. (1977). Solutions of ill-posed problems. Washington, DC: Winston.
Hadamard, J. (1923). Lectures on the cauchy problems in linear partial differential equations. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Castillo, E., Conejo, A. J., MÃnguez, R., et al. (2006). A closed formula for local sensitivity analysis in mathematical programming. Engineering Optimization, 38(1), 93–112.
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., et al. (2004). Sensitivity analysis in practice: A guide to assessing scientific models. Wiley.
Pastres, R., Franco, D., Pecenik, G., et al. (1997). Local sensitivity analysis of a distributed parameters water quality model. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 57(1), 21–30.
Zhang, J., & Heitjan, D. F. (2006). A simple local sensitivity analysis tool for nonignorable coarsening: Application to dependent censoring. Biometrics, 62(4), 1260–1268.
Saltelli, A., & Marivoet, J. (1990). Non-parametric statistics in sensitivity analysis for model output: A comparison of selected techniques. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 28(2), 229–253.
Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., & Saltelli, A. (2007). An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large moels. Environmental Modelling and Software, 22(10), 1509–1518.
McRae, G. J., Tilden, J. W., & Seinfeld, J. H. (1982). Global sensitivity analysis—A computational implementation of the Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST). Computers & Chemical Engineering, 6(1), 15–25.
Sobol, I. M. (2001). Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 55(1–3), 271–280.
Sudret, B. (2008). Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93(7), 964–979.
Tian, W. (2013). A review of sensitivity analysis methods in building energy analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 20, 411–419.
Saltelli, A., & Sobol, I. M. (1995). About the use of rank transformation in sensitivity analysis of model output. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 50(3), 225–239.
Korenberg, M., Billings, S. A., Liu, Y. P., et al. (1988). Orthogonal parameter estimation algorithm for non-linear stochastic systems. International Journal of Control, 48(1), 193–210.
Landweber, L. (1951). An iteration formula for fredholm integral equations of the first kind. American Journal of Mathematics, 73, 615–624.
Backus, G. E., & Gilbert, F. (1970). Uniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross earth data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 22, 123–192.
Awrejcewicz, J., & Krysko, V. A. (2004). Nonclassical thermoelastic problems in nonlinear dynamics of shells: Applications of the Bubnov-Galerkin and finite difference numerical methods. Springer.
Hansen, P. C. (1990). Truncated SVD solutions to discrete ill-posed problems with ill-determined numerical rank. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 11, 503–518.
Hoerl, A. E., & Kennard, R. W. (1970). Ridge regression: Biased estimation for non-orthogonal problems. Technometrics, 12(1), 55–67.
Sun, X. S., Liu, J., Han, X., et al. (2014). A new improved regularization method for dynamic load identification. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 22(7), 1062–1076.
Paige, C. C., & Saunders, M. A. (1982). LSQR: An algorithm of sparse linear equations and sparse least squares. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 8(1), 43–72.
Saad, Y., & Schultz, M. H. (1985). GMRES: A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 7(3), 856–869.
Morozov, V. A. (2012). Methods for solving incorrectly posed problems. New York: Springer.
Engl, H. W., Hanke, M., & Neubauer, A. (1996). Regularization of inverse problems. New York: Springer.
Tikhonov, A. N., & Arsenin, V. Y. (1977). Solutions of ill-posed problems. New York: Wiley.
Golub, G. H., Heath, M., & Wahba, G. (1979). Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics, 21, 215–223.
Hansen, P. C., & Leary, D. P. (1993). The use of the L-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 14, 1487–1503.
Hansen, P. C. (1998). Rank-deficient and discrete ill-posed problems. Philadelphia: SIAM.
Liu, J. (2011). Research on computational inverse techniques in dynamic load identification. Changsha: Hunan University.
Wang, Z., & Gao, T. (1990). An introduction to homotopy methods. Chongqin: Chongqin Press.
Krishnakumar, K. (1990). Micro-genetic algorithms for stationary and non-stationary function optimization. In Proceeding of Advances in Intelligent Robotics Systems Conference, International Society for Optics and Photonics (pp. 289–296).
Liu, G. R., Han, X., & Lam, K. Y. (2002). A combined genetic algorithm and nonlinear least squares method for material characterization using elastic waves. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 191, 1909–1921.
Chen, R. (2014). The research on hybrid inverse method for material characteristic parameters identification and applications. Changsha: Hunan University.
Alavi, A. H., & Gandomi, A. H. (2011). Prediction of principal ground-motion parameters using a hybrid method coupling artificial neural networks and simulated annealing. Computers & Structures, 23–24, 2176–2194.
Himmelblau, D. M. (1972). Applied nonlinear programming. New York: McGraw Hill Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Science Press, Beijing and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Han, X., Liu, J. (2020). Computational Inverse Techniques. In: Numerical Simulation-based Design. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3090-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3090-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3089-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3090-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)