Skip to main content

Clinical Trials

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biomaterials for Musculoskeletal Regeneration

Part of the book series: Indian Institute of Metals Series ((IIMS))

  • 625 Accesses

Abstract

An important concept that has been increasingly recognised in the biomedical research community is the ‘bedside-bench-bedside’ concept. Once a new biomaterial is found to exhibit a pre-clinically acceptable biocompatibility , the final and the most important stage of research is the clinical trial using ethically-approved protocols. The research on biomaterials should evolve around a specific disease model and, therefore, in vitro as well as in vivo biocompatibility assessments should involve the use of relevant cell lines or animal models, respectively. This chapter introduces the importance of clinical trials in biomaterials’ research, which has received increasing attention, but is yet at a lower intensity than those in the case of new drug designs and development. Further more, various possible avenues to conduct clinical trials are also briefly mentioned. Subsequently, this chapter discusses the concept of Randomised Control Trials (RCTs). Some illustrative examples are also provided to substantiate how clinical trials can establish the clinical efficacy of some of in vivo biocompatible implants. The various stages of the clinical trials are also highlighted. One specific example is discussed to describe the rationale for the study of design as well as the outcomes of clinical trials, particularly in the context of dental implants in prosthodontics . Subsequently, the chapter closes with the ethical issues/approval stages to be critically considered prior to conducting any clinical trials. The content and discussion in this chapter should be used only for academic purposes as the ethical approval and associated legal issues involved in clinical trials can vary from country to country. In order to illustrate some published clinical study reports in the field of bone tissue engineering applications are described for the readers to develop an understanding of how to conduct such experiments in clinical settings as well as how to evaluate the outcomes of such important studies. As a cautionary note to the readers, this chapter should neither be used to design any clinical trial study nor does this document have any legal binding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gentleman E, Fredholm YC, Jell G, Lotfibakhshaiesh N, O’Donnell MD, Hill RG, et al. The effects of strontium-substituted bioactive glasses on osteoblasts and osteoclasts in vitro. Biomaterials. 2010;31:3949–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ravi ND, Balu R, Sampath Kumar TS. Strontium-substituted calcium deficient hydroxyapatite nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and antibacterial properties. J Am Ceram Soc. 2012;95(9):2700–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goel A, Rajagopal RR, Ferreira JM. Influence of strontium on structure, sintering and biodegradation behaviour of CaO–MgO–SrO–SiO2–P2O5–CaF2 glasses. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(11):4071–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vestermark MT, Hauge EM, Soballe K, Bechtold JE, Jakobsen T, Baas J. Strontium doping of bone graft extender. Acta Orthop. 2011;82(5):614–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamdy NA. Strontium ranelate improves bone microarchitecture in osteoporosis. Rheumatology. 2009;48:9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brennan TC, Rybchyn MS, Green W, Atwa S, Conigrave AD, Mason RS. Osteoblasts play key roles in the mechanisms of action of strontium ranelate. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;157:1291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Buehler J, Chappuis P, Saffar JL, Tsouderos Y, Vignery A. Strontium ranelate inhibits bone resorption while maintaining bone formation in alveolar bone in monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Bone. 2001;29:176–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Canalis E, Hott M, Deloffre P, Tsouderos Y, Marie PJ. The divalent strontium salt S12911 enhances bone cell replication and bone formation in vitro. Bone. 1996;18:517–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fromigue O, Hay E, Barbara A, Petrel C, Traiffort E, Ruat M, et al. Calcium sensing receptor-dependent and receptor-independent activation of osteoblast replication and survival by strontium ranelate. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13:2189–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh PK, Singh BP, Alvi HA, et al. Effect of various treatment modalities in sleep bruxism. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.025.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mall P, Chand P, Siddarth R, Rao J, Singh BP et al. Effectiveness of positioning stents in radiation induced xerostomia having tongue carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Prosthodont. (accepted).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Talwar N, Chand P, Singh BP et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of a prosthodontic stent in determining the position of dental implants. J Prosthodont. 2012;21(1):42–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Agrawal KK, Tripathi A, Chand P, Singh RD, Rao J, Singh BP. A study to evaluate the effect of oral stereognosis in acceptance of fixed prosthesis. Indian J Dental Res. 2011;22(4):611.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Easwer HV, Rajeev A, Varma HK, Vijayan S, Bhattacharya RN. Cosmetic and radiological outcome following the use of synthetic hydroxyapatite porous-dense bilayer burr-hole buttons. Acta Neurochir. 2006;149:481–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Narayana K. Acharya, Chinnappa V. Mahajan, Renjit J. Kumar, Hari Krishna Varma, and Venugopal K. Menon. Can iliac crest reconstruction reduce donor site morbidity? A study using degradable hydroxyapatite-bioactive glass ceramic composite. J Spinal Disorder Technol. 2010;23:266–71.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rajesh JB, Nandakumar K, Varma HK, Komath M. Calcium phosphate cement as a “barrier-graft” for the treatment of human periodontal intraosseous defects. Indian J Dental Res. 2009;20(4):471–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Menon KV, Varma HK. Radiological outcome of tibial plateau fractures treated with percutaneously introduced synthetic porous hydroxyapatite granules. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2005;15:205–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sourabh Ghosh .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Basu, B., Ghosh, S. (2017). Clinical Trials. In: Biomaterials for Musculoskeletal Regeneration. Indian Institute of Metals Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3017-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics