Abstract
Musical timbre has traditionally been treated as a sensory phenomenon, that is, as a “surface feature” that resides in the musical moment. The role of familiarity with sound source categories and instrument families has remained unexplored. The current chapter takes a dedicatedly cognitive view on timbre and argues that long-term familiarity and knowledge about instrument categories affect even such supposedly low-level tasks as dissimilarity ratings. As a background, the chapter provides a conceptual framework for the notion of timbre, as well as an outline of basic results from timbre dissimilarity ratings and instrument identification. Results from a previous study on the role of sound source categories in timbre dissimilarity ratings are then discussed in depth (Siedenburg et al. in Frontiers in Psychology 6, 2016b). This study collected timbre dissimilarity ratings for tones from acoustic musical instruments as well as for novel, digitally transformed tones. The main pieces of evidence to be discussed come from rating asymmetries and a regression model. It is argued that timbre perception is characterized by an interplay of sensory and categorical representations, reflecting acoustic facets and learned sound source and instrument categories of musical instruments. Implications for the design of novel digital musical instrument design are being discussed.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Agus, T. R., Suied, C., Thorpe, S. J., & Pressnitzer, D. (2012). Fast recognition of musical sounds based on timbre. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(5), 4124–4133.
Agus, T. R., Thorpe, S. J., & Pressnitzer, D. (2010). Rapid formation of robust auditory memories: Insights from noise. Neuron, 66, 610–618.
Caclin, A., McAdams, S., Smith, B. K., & Winsberg, S. (2005). Acoustic correlates of timbre space dimensions: A confirmatory study using synthetic tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(1), 471–482.
Elliott, T., Hamilton, L., & Theunissen, F. (2013). Acoustic structure of the five perceptual dimensions of timbre in orchestral instrument tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(1), 389–404.
Giordano, B. L., & McAdams, S. (2010). Sound source mechanics and musical timbre perception: Evidence from previous studies. Music Perception, 28(2), 155–168.
Grey, J. M. (1975). An exploration of musical timbre (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). CCRMA, Stanford University.
Hajda, J. M., Kendall, R. A., Carterette, E. C., & Harshberger, M. L. (1997). Methodological issues in timbre research. In I. Deliège & J. Sloboda (Eds.), Perception and cognition of music (pp. 253–306). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Halpern, A. R., Zatorre, R. J., Bouffard, M., & Johnson, J. A. (2004). Behavioral and neural correlates of perceived and imagined musical timbre. Neuropsychologia, 42(9), 1281–1292.
Handel, S. (1995). Timbre perception and auditory object identification. In B. C. Moore (Ed.), Hearing (Vol. 2, pp. 425–461). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Handel, S., & Erickson, M. L. (2004). Sound source identification: The possible role of timbre transformations. Music Perception, 21(4), 587–610.
Huron, D. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Krumhansl, C. L. (1989). Why is musical timbre so hard to understand? In S. Nielzén & O. Olsson (Eds.), Structure and perception of electroacoustic sound and music (Vol. 846, pp. 43–53). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Excerpta Medica.
Krumhansl, C. L. (1990). Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29(1), 1–27.
Lakatos, S. (2000). A common perceptual space for harmonic and percussive timbres. Perception and Psychophysics, 62(7), 1426–1439.
Lindau, A., Erbes, V., Lepa, S., Maempel, H.-J., Brinkman, F., & Weinzierl, S. (2014). A spatial audio quality inventory (SAQI). Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 100(5), 984–994.
Marozeau, J., de Cheveigné, A., McAdams, S., & Winsberg, S. (2003). The dependency of timbre on fundamental frequency. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(5), 2946–2957.
McAdams, S. (1993). Recognition of sound sources and events. In S. McAdams & E. Bigand (Eds.), Thinking in sound: The cognitive psychology of human audition (pp. 146–198). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
McAdams, S. (2013). Musical timbre perception. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (3rd ed., pp. 35–67). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
McAdams, S., Beauchamp, J. W., & Meneguzzi, S. (1999). Discrimination of musical instrument sounds resynthesized with simplified spectrotemporal parameters. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105(2), 882–897.
McAdams, S., Roussarie, V., Chaigne, A., & Giordano, B. L. (2010). The psychomechanics of simulated sound sources: Material properties of impacted thin plates. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(3), 1401–1413.
McAdams, S., Winsberg, S., Donnadieu, S., De Soete, G., & Krimphoff, J. (1995). Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: Common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes. Psychological Research, 58(3), 177–192.
Pantev, C., Roberts, L. E., Schulz, M., Engelien, A., & Ross, B. (2001). Timbre-specific enhancement of auditory cortical representations in musicians. Neuro Report, 12(1), 169–174.
Patterson, R. D., Robinson, K., Holdsworth, J., McKeown, D., Zhang, C., & Allerhand, M. (1992). Complex sounds and auditory images. Auditory Physiology and Perception, 83, 429–446.
Peeters, G., Giordano, B. L., Susini, P., Misdariis, N., & McAdams, S. (2011). The Timbre Toolbox: Extracting audio descriptors from musical signals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(5), 2902–2916.
Plomp, R. (1970). Timbre as a multidimensional attribute of complex tones. In R. Plomp & G. F. Smoorenburg (Eds.), Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing (pp. 397–414). Leiden, The Netherlands: Suithoff.
Shahin, A. J., Roberts, L. E., Chau, W., Trainor, L. J., & Miller, L. M. (2008). Music training leads to the development of timbre-specific gamma band activity. Neuroimage, 41(1), 113–122.
Shamma, S., & Fritz, J. (2014). Adaptive auditory computations. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 25, 164–168.
Siedenburg, K., Fujinaga, I., & McAdams, S. (2016a). A comparison of approaches to timbre descriptors in music information retrieval and music psychology. Journal of New Music Research (in press).
Siedenburg, K., Jones-Mollerup, K., & McAdams, S. (2016b). Acoustic and categorical dissimilarity of musical timbre: Evidence from asymmetries between acoustic and chimeric sounds. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1977). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01977
Siedenburg, K., & McAdams, S. (2016). The role of long-term familiarity and attentional maintenance in auditory short-term memory for timbre. Memory, published online. doi:10.1080/09658211.2016.1197945.
Smith, Z. M., Delgutte, B., & Oxenham, A. J. (2002). Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature, 416(6876), 87–90.
Srinivasan, A., Sullivan, D., & Fujinaga, I. (2002). Recognition of isolated instrument tones by conservatory students. In Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Sydney (pp. 17–21), July 17–21.
Strait, D. L., Chan, K., Ashley, R., & Kraus, N. (2012). Specialization among the specialized: Auditory brainstem function is tuned into timbre. Cortex, 48(3), 360–362.
Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84(4), 327–352.
Wessel, D. L. (1973). Psychoacoustics and music: A report from Michigan State University. PACE: Bulletin of the Computer Arts Society, 30, 1–2.
Winsberg, S., & De Soete, G. (1993). A latent class approach to fitting the weighted Euclidean model. CLASCAL. Psychometrika, 58(2), 315–330.
Wold, S., Sjöström, M., & Eriksson, L. (2001). PLS-regression: A basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 58(2), 109–130.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Siedenburg, K. (2017). Instruments Unheard of: On the Role of Familiarity and Sound Source Categories in Timbre Perception. In: Bovermann, T., de Campo, A., Egermann, H., Hardjowirogo, SI., Weinzierl, S. (eds) Musical Instruments in the 21st Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2951-6_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2951-6_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2950-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2951-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)