Skip to main content

Sustainable Luxury and Fashion: From Global Standardisation to Critical Customisation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Management of Luxury

Abstract

The concept of luxury is often linked to fashion. Even if those two terms have obvious different meanings, they both refer—in terms of goods and expenses—to the economic and cultural field of uselessness, excess, waste. Furthermore, in these years, a new element has been introduced to this relationship: distinction. Although we live in the age of global fast-fashion, distinction means nowadays creating a personal fashion, caring for the production processes, the workers’ conditions, environmental issues and the material “history” of what one wears. In other words: sustainability. Therefore fashion becomes luxurious, not only economically, but also highlighting values such as uniqueness, customisation and wellness—the same values on which luxury is based. Fashion and luxury can thus create a new critical and ethical paradigm. This paper will focus on this new paradigm of luxury concerning fashion, the word “critical” referring above all to the concept of “choice”. One can choose his/her clothes and can distinguish his/herself by taking care of the senses, of materials, of time. The first section of this paper will analyse how the concepts of fashion and luxury were defined and differentiated by Social Sciences at the beginning of the Twentieth Century (Sombart in Luxus und Kapitalismus. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 1913; Veblen in The theory of the leisure class. Macmillan, New York, 1899; Simmel in Psychologie der Mode. Die Zeit: Wiener Wochenschrift für Politik, Volkswirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Kunst 5(54):22–24, 1895). The main aspect of this difference lies in the relationship with time of the two concepts: luxury is eternal and fashion is always changing. Then this paper will consider the critique of this “classical” differentiation operated by Fashion Theory—born in the last decades of the Twentieth Century as an autonomous field of research in Cultural Studies. The symbolic principles of modern luxury will be compared with the symbolic meaning of contemporary fast-fashion. The core of this paper is represented by the analysis on how fashion is rethinking its own patterns: from haute couture to the “fastest” brands, many fashion companies and designers are aware of ethical issues and sustainability, nowadays. Therefore sustainable luxury seems to be the only path for contemporary fashion culture and creativity. Finally, this paper will consider some examples as case studies, focusing especially on some new contemporary Italian fashion brands. One of these brands—Cangiari—will be analysed in detail as an ethical luxury brand, caring deeply for social commitment and sustainability.

English translation from Italian by Sveva Scaramuzzi

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All accessed 30 March 2016.

References

  • Ágalma (2002) Il lusso oscuro oggetto del desiderio. 2, Meltemi, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes R (1957) Mythologies. Seuil, Paris. English edition: Barthes R (1972) Mythologies (trans: Lavers A). Paladin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes R (2006) The language of fashion. In: Carter M (ed) (trans: Stafford A). Berg, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bataille G (1967) La part maudite précédé de La notion de dépense. Minuit, Paris. English edition: Bataille G (1988) The Accursed Share: An Essay on General Economy. Volume I: Consumption (trans: Hurley R). Zone Books, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin W (1968) Illuminations. In: Arendt H (ed) (trans: Zohn H). Schocken Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin W (1982) Das PassagenWerk. In: Tiedemann R (ed) Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. English edition: Benjamin W (1999) The Arcades Project (trans: Eiland H, McLaughlin K). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste E (1969) Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes. i. Economie, parenté, societé. Minuit, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry C (1994) The idea of luxury. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Borghero C (ed) (1974) La polemica sul lusso nel Settecento francese. Einaudi, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1979) La distinction. Minuit, Paris. English edition, Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (trans: Nice R). Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Calefato P (2003) Lusso. Meltemi, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Calefato P (2014) Luxury. Fashion, lifestyle, and excess. Bloomsbury, New York-London

    Google Scholar 

  • Castiglione B (1528) Il libro del Cortegiano, English edition: Castiglione B (1997) The Book of the Courtier (trans: Bull G A). Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Curcio AM (ed) (2005) Sociologia della moda e del lusso. Franco Angeli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelkoort L (2015) Anti-fashion manifesto. Available at http://www.edelkoort.com/2015/09/anti_fashion-manifesto. Accessed 29 Feb 2016

  • Enzensberger HM (1997) Zickzack. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. English edition: Enzensberger HM (1998) Zig Zag: The Politics of Culture and Vice Versa (trans: Rugg LH). New Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank RH (1999) Luxury fever. Money and happiness in an era of excess. Princeton University Press, Princeton-Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardetti MA, Muthu SS (eds) (2015) Handbook of sustainable luxury textiles and fashion. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannone A, Calefato P (2007) Manuale di comunicazione, sociologia e cultura della moda, Vol 5: performance. Meltemi, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci A (1975) Quaderni del carcere. Edizione critica a cura di V. Gerratana. Einaudi, Turin. English edition: Gramsci A (2011) Prison Notebooks. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebdige D (1979) Subculture. The meaning of style. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Koolhaas R (2001) Projects for prada part 1. Fondazione Prada, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipovetsky G (avec Roux E) (2003) Le luxe éternel. Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu P, Monneyron F (2015) L’imaginaire du luxe. Imago, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Molho R (2016) Due mondi, una sola vision, marie claire #likes 2, HMC Italia: 52–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulicelli E (ed) (2006) Moda e moderno. Meltemi, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegle L (2015) Eco-luxury. L’etica ha un valore. marie claire #likes 1, HMC Italia. http://mclikes.marieclaire.it/alta-moda-lusso-ecosostenibilita. Accessed 29 Feb 2016

  • Simmel G (1895) Zur Psychologie der Mode. Die Zeit: Wiener Wochenschrift für Politik, Volkswirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Kunst 5, Band 1895, Nr. 54 (12.10.1895): 22–24. English edition: Simmel G (1904) Fashion. Int Q 10: 130–155. http://www.modetheorie.de/fileadmin/Texte/s/Simmel-Fashion_1904.pdf. Accessed 29 Feb 2016

  • Simmel G (1900) Philosophie des Geldes. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin. English edition: Simmel G (1978) The Philosophy of Money. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sombart W (1913) Luxus und Kapitalismus. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin. English edition: Sombart W (1967) Luxury and Capitalism (trans: Dittmar WR). University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas D (2007) Deluxe. How luxury lost its luster. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen T (1899) The theory of the leisure class. Macmillan, New York. Modern edition: Veblen T (2007) The theory of the leisure class. The Echo Library, Teddington, Middlesex

    Google Scholar 

  • Versace G, Calabrese O (1993) Signatures. Abbeville Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1904–1905) Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist der Kapitalismus. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, Tübingen. English edition: Weber M (2002) The Protestant Ethic and the “Spirit” of Capitalism and Other Writings. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

Websites

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrizia Calefato .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Calefato, P. (2017). Sustainable Luxury and Fashion: From Global Standardisation to Critical Customisation. In: Gardetti, M. (eds) Sustainable Management of Luxury. Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2917-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics