Abstract
The purpose of this research is to describe and investigate an innovative model for collaborative curriculum reform developed using Communities of Practice (CoP) theory which can work in any discipline. It is an engaging story for readers in higher education about an academic CoP from the coalface; academics who are dealing with real problems and issues. The narrative includes practical examples and critical reflection by educators directly engaged in curricular reform. This research addresses a need to ensure quality in university teaching and learning by supporting the development of an integrated curriculum. It investigates how faculty engage in this process and illuminates the complex ways in which they work. There are four main findings: faculty improve their practice through the implementation of the new framework using a CoP; the promotion of students’ innovation skills is an essential component of a successful program; communication and collaboration mitigates resistance to change; and a shared vision promotes faculty involvement. We reveal complexities in relationships between faculty and administration, and show successful collaboration and organizational change can be achieved through a community of practice under challenging conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Anfara, V. A., Jr., Brown, K. M., & Mangione, T. L. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28–38.
Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. New York: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Barrie, S. C. (2007). A conceptual framework for the teaching and learning of generic graduate attributes. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 439–458.
Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Biggs, J. B. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364.
Biggs, J. B. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 18(1), 57–75.
Biggs, J. B. (2003). Aligning teaching and assessing to course objectives. Paper presented at the teaching and learning in higher education conference: New trends and innovations, University of Aveiro, April 13–17.
Boud, D. (1999). Situating academic development in professional work: Using peer learning. International Journal for Academic Development, 4(1), 5–10.
Boud, D., & Middleton, H. (2003). Learning from other at work: Communities of practice and informal learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(5), 194–209.
Boud, D., & Walker, D. (1998). Promoting reflection in professional courses: The challenge of context. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 191–206.
Brew, A. (2004). Editorial: The scope of academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 9(1), 5–7.
Brown, A. J., Goodman, J., & Yasukawa, K. (2008). Casualisation of academic work: Industrial justice and quality education. Dialogue, 27, 17–29.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
Chua, A. Y. K. (2006). The rise and fall of a community of practice: A descriptive case study. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(2), 120–128.
Connelly, F. M., Clandinin, D. J., & He, M. F. (1997). Teachers’ personal practical knowledge on the professional knowledge landscape. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(7), 665–674.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage.
Damodharan, V. S., Majumdar, S., & Gallant, M. (2010). Relevance of education for potential entrepreneurs: An international investigation. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17(4), 626–640.
Defise, R. (2013). Supporting the implementation of curriculum reform through learning communities and communities of practice. Prospects, 43, 473–479.
Denzin, N. K. (2010). Grounded and indigenous theories and the politics of pragmatism. Sociological Inquiry, 80(2), 286–319.
Elliott, A. E., & Woloshyn, V. E. (1997). Some female professors’ experiences of collaboration: Mapping the collaborative process through rough terrain. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 43, 23–36.
Feldman, D. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2001). A field study of adjunct faculty: The impact of career stage on reactions to non-tenure-jobs. Journal of Career Development, 28(1), 1–16.
Finkle, T. A., Kuratko, D. F., & Goldsby, M. G. (2006). An examination of entrepreneurship centers in the United States: A national survey. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 184–206.
Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2006). The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1173–1193.
Florin, J., Karri, R., & Rossiter, N. (2007). Fostering entrepreneurial drive in business education: An attitudinal approach. Journal of Management Education, 31(1), 17–49.
Frielick, S. (2004). The zone of academic development: An ecological approach to learning and teaching in higher education. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
Gibbs, G. (2002). Qualitative data analysis: Explorations with NVivo (understanding social research). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Greisler, D. (2002). Adjunct to what? A non-traditional perspective on teaching and social sciences. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(9), 1125–1141.
Hanrahan, M., Ryan, M., & Duncan, M. (2001). The professional engagement model of academic induction into on-line teaching. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(2), 130–149.
Hicks, O. (2007). Curriculum in higher education in Australia–Hello? Paper presented at the enhancing higher education, theory and scholarship, proceedings of the 30th HERDSA annual conference, Adelaide, Australia, July 8–11.
Hodkinson, P., & Hodkinson, H. (2004). A constructive critique of communities of practice: Moving beyond Lave and Wenger. In Integrating work 7 learning, contemporary issues seminar series, OVAL research working paper 0402, May 11, 2004.
Junor, A. (2004). Casual university work: Choice, risk, inequity and the case for regulation. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 14(2), 276–304.
Kabongo, J. D., & McCaskey, P. H. (2011). An examination of entrepreneurship educator profiles in business programs in the United States. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18(1), 27–49.
Kayes, D. C. (2002). Experiential learning and its critics: Preserving the role of experience in management learning and education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1(2), 137–149.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kosky, L. (2005). The university and its engagement with the community. Paper presented at the Town and Gown Dinner, University of Melbourne, May 25, 2005.
Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 577–598.
Land, R. (2004). Educational development: Discourse, identity and practice. Maidenhead: Open University/Society for Research into Higher Education.
Landes, D. S. (2010). Global enterprise and industrial performance: An overview. In D. S. Landes, J. Mokyr, & W. J. Baumol (Eds.), The invention of enterprise: Entrepreneurship from ancient Mesopotamia to modern times (pp. 1–7). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Lee, A. (2005). Discussion paper—Knowing our business: The role of education in the university. Callagan, NSW: Australian Council of Deans of Education.
Lee, A., & Boud, D. (2003). Writing groups, change and academic identity: Research development as local practice. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 187–200.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Manev, I. M., & Manolova, T. S. (2010). Entrepreneurship in transitional economies: Review and integration of two decades of research. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 69–99.
May, R., Campbell, I., & Burgess, J. (2005). The rise and rise of casual work in Australia: Who benefits, who loses? Paper presented at the IR changes report card, University of Sydney, June 20.
McCormick, B., & Gray, V. (2010). Message in a Bottle: Basic business lessons for entrepreneurs using only a soft drink. Journal of Management Education, 35(2), 282–310.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Monaghan, C. H. (2011). Communities of practice: A learning strategy for management education. Journal of Management Education, 35(3), 428–453.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pocock, B., Buchanan, J., & Campbell, I. (2004). Meeting the challenge of casual work in Australia: Evidence, past treatment and future policy. Australian Bulletin of Labour, 30(1), 16–39.
Richards, L. (2005). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. London: Sage.
Salmona, M. (2009). Engaging casually employed teachers in collaborative curriculum and professional development: Change through an action research enquiry in a higher education pathways institution. Sydney: University of Technology.
Salter, D., Pang, M. Y. C., & Sharma, P. (2009). Active tasks to change the use of class time within an outcomes based approach to curriculum design. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 6(1).
Samila, S., & Sorenson, O. (2011). Venture capital, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 338–349.
Sonfield, M. C. (2000). Establishing and developing entrepreneurship and small business growth in a post-communist economy: The case of Hungary. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(2), 16–26.
Song, L. Z., Song, M., & Parry, M. E. (2010). Perspective: Economic conditions, entrepreneurship, first product development, and new venture success. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(1), 130–135.
Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., & Silver, E. A. (1999). The Development of professional developers: Learning to assist teachers in new settings in new ways. Harvard Educational Review, 69(3), 237–269.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Vandenheuval, A., & Wooden, M. (1999). Casualisation and outsourcing: Trends and implications for work-related training. Adelaide: National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER).
Viswanathan, M. (2012). Curricular innovations on sustainability and subsistence marketplaces: Philosophical, substantive, and methodological orientations. Journal of Management Education, 36(3), 389–427.
Wallin, D. L. (2007). Part-time faculty and professional development: Notes from the field. New Directions for Community Colleges, 140, 67–73.
Wenger, E. (1998a). Communities of practice. Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 5.
Wenger, E. (1998b). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Salmona, M., Smart, K. (2017). Promoting a Community of Practice Through Collaborative Curriculum Reform in a University Business School. In: McDonald, J., Cater-Steel, A. (eds) Communities of Practice. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2879-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2879-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2877-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2879-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)