Skip to main content

Delivering Institutional Priorities in Learning and Teaching Through a Social Learning Model: Embedding a High Impact Community of Practice Initiative at the University of Tasmania

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Communities of Practice

Abstract

This chapter describes the University of Tasmania’s Communities of Practice Initiative (CoPI), established in 2011 by the Deputy Vice Chancellor (Students and Education). The purpose of the CoPI is to provide collaborative professional learning opportunities for staff around priority and special interest areas in learning and teaching. Importantly, the CoPI is supported with strategic funding, allocated to promote the development of emergent, evolving and broad-reaching Communities of Practice (CoP). Coordinated by the central learning and teaching unit of the University of Tasmania, the CoPI provides on-going professional development for participants to support them to establish, facilitate, disseminate and sustain their work. Since 2011, the CoPI has funded over 30 CoPs in three distinct programs. The initiative has raised the profile of learning and teaching across the institution and increased the number of staff actively participating in learning and teaching scholarship. The CoPI is recognised by staff to provide collegial learning opportunities and space to engage with colleagues from other parts of the University with similar interests. This chapter outlines the background, establishment, and on-going development of the CoPI, including the professional learning opportunities afforded to participants through the initiative. In doing so, this chapter showcases a whole-of-institution program that has delivered professional learning opportunities for individuals and groups leading to institutional change and the enhancement of the learning and teaching culture across the University of Tasmania.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, C., & McCune, V. (2013). Fostering meaning: Fostering community. Higher Education, 66(3), 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, J. A. J., Rosman, S. N., Eze, U. C., & Gan, G. G. G. (2009). Communities of practice the source of competitive advantage in organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 10(1). www.tlainc.com/articl181.htm. Accessed February 25, 2015.

  • Blackmore, C. (Ed.). (2010). Social learning systems and communities of practice. Doredrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blessinger, P., & Carfora, J. M. (Eds.). (2014). Inquiry-based learning for faculty and institutional development: A conceptual and practical resource for educators. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Middleton, H. (2003). Learning from others at work: Communities of practice and informal learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(5), 194–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., Goodman, J., & Yasukawa, K. (2010). Academic casualisation in Australia. The Journal of Industrial Relations, 52(2), 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordiner, M. C., & Brown, N. (2009). Using a distributed leadership strategy to improve the quality of assessment across a university: Initial results of the project. ATN Assessment Conference. (2009). Assessment in different dimensions conference proceedings (pp. 104–110). Melbourne: Australian Technology Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. D. (2004). Introduction to faculty learning communities. In M. D. Cox & L. Richlin (Eds.), Building faculty learning communities (pp. 5–23). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. D., & Richlin, L. (Eds.). (2004). Building faculty learning communities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organisational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, A. G., Pharo, E. J., & Warr, K. (2012). Demonstrating distributed leadership through cross-disciplinary peer networks: Responding to climate change complexity. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubé, L., Bourhis, A., & Jacob, R. (2005). The impact of structuring characteristics on the launching of virtual communities of practice. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18(2), 145–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaither, G. (Ed.). (1999). The multi-campus system: Perspectives on practice and prospects. Sterling: Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, P., & Kimble, C. (2004). Knowledge networks: Innovation through communities of practice. London: Idea Group Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, P., & Kimble, C. (2008). Introduction and overview. In C. Kimble, P. M. Hildreth, & I. Bourdon (Eds.), Communities of practice: Creating learning environments for educators (Vol. 1, pp. ix–xix). Charlotte: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M., & Haigh, M. (2012). Creating a culture of research in teacher education: Learning research within communities of practice. Studies in Higher Education, 37(8), 971–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. (2010). Building pedagogic excellence: Learning and teaching fellowships within communities of practice at the University of Brighton. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3), 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, S., & Benson, S. (2013). Changing faculty use of technology—One cohort at a time. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 5(2), 202–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M. R. (2005). Communities of practice in higher education. In B. Bartin & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond communities of practice: Language, power and social context (pp. 180–197). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, J., Bell, S., Bohan, J., Brown, A., Burke, J., Cogdell, B., et al. (2010). From anxiety to empowerment: A learning community of university teachers. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(3), 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J., & Palani, A. (2011). Building leadership capacity for community of practice facilitators: Edgy professional development. In Research and development in higher education: Reshaping higher education (pp. 198–206). Gold Coast: The Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J., Star, C., & Margetts, F. (2012). Identifying, building and sustaining leadership capacity for communities of practice in higher education. Canberra: Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J., & West, M. (2012). Response to: Generating excitement, relevance and value: How to make the most out of your community of practice. Hobart: Tasmanian Institute of Learning and Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, L., & Pemberton, J. (2013). Research-based communities of practice in UK higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(10), 1522–1539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, J. (2014). Enhancing student learning and teacher development in transnational education. New York: The Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pharo, E., Davison, A., McGregor, H., Warr, K., & Brown, P. (2014). Using communities of practice to enhance interdisciplinary teaching: Lessons from four Australian institutions. Higher Education Research and Development, 33(2), 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pifer, M. J., & Baker, V. L. (2013). Managing the process: The intradepartmental network of early-career academics. Innovative Higher Education, 38(4), 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponjuan, L., Conley, V. M., & Trower, C. (2011). Career stage differences in pre-tenure track faculty perceptions of professional and personal relationships with colleagues. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(3), 319–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, D. (2013, November). Closing plenary. In Presented at the tasmanian institute of learning and teaching 12th annual teaching matters conference, Sandy Bay, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, N. S., & Levine, J. H. (1999). Creating learning communities: A practical guide to winning support, organizing for change, and implementing programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skalicky, J., & Brown, N. (2009). Peer learning framework: A community of practice model. Report to the University of Tasmania Student Transition and Retention Taskforce. Hobart: Centre for the Advancement of Learning and Teaching, University of Tasmania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skalicky, J., & West, M. (2012). UTAS community of practice initiative: Readings and resources. Hobart: Tasmanian Institute of Learning and Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuckey, B., & Smith, J. D. (2004). Building sustainable communities of practice. In P. M. Hildreth & C. Kimble (Eds.), Knowledge networks: Innovation through communities of practice (pp. 150–164). London: Idea Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation. (2009). Communities of practice—From own to shared knowledge. www.sdc-learningandnetworking.ch/en/Home/Library?applState=detail&itemID=7287. Accessed October 10, 2014.

  • Szekeres, J. (2011). Professional staff carve out a new space. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(6), 679–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Tasmania. (2012a). University of Tasmania strategic plan for learning and teaching 2012–2014. www.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/268160/Learning-and-Teaching-Strategic-Plan.pdf. Accessed February 25, 2015.

  • University of Tasmania. (2012b). Open to talent: Strategic plan 2012—Onwards. www.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/327498/UTMC8112_Strategic-Plan_Large-V4.pdf. Accessed February 25, 2015.

  • University of Tasmania. (2014a). The UTAS academic. www.utas.edu.au/provost/the-utas-academic-performance-expectations-for-academic-staff. Accessed February 25, 2015.

  • University of Tasmania. (2014b). Teaching development grant guidelines. www.teaching-learning.utas.edu.au/awards-and-grants/national-and-other-awards/utas-teaching-development-grants. Accessed February 25, 2015.

  • Warr Pedersen, K., & Brown, N. (2013, July). Collaborative promotion of learning and teaching: The UTAS communities of practice initiative and the Tasmanian Institute of Learning and Teaching. Poster presented at the meeting of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, Auckland, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2006). Introduction to communities of practice: A brief overview of the concept and its uses. http://wenger-trayner.com/theory/. Accessed February 25, 2015.

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitechurch, C. (2008). Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: The emergence of third space professionals in UK Higher Education. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the dedicated contributions of all of the Communities of Practice participants in the Communities of Practice Initiative at UTAS, without whom the success of the initiative would not be possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin Warr Pedersen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pedersen, K.W., West, M., Brown, N., Sadler, D., Nash, K. (2017). Delivering Institutional Priorities in Learning and Teaching Through a Social Learning Model: Embedding a High Impact Community of Practice Initiative at the University of Tasmania. In: McDonald, J., Cater-Steel, A. (eds) Communities of Practice. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2879-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2879-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2877-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2879-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics