Skip to main content

Where’s My Parking Permit? Bringing New Staff Together as a Learning Community

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Communities of Practice

Abstract

The process of adaption to a new work environment can be significantly accelerated through social learning opportunities. However, contemporary trends toward corporatisation of universities are seeing diminishing social encounters and this can have significant implications for new staff. This chapter offers that Communities of Practice (CoPs) can be a practical solution toward supplementing the diminishing levels of collegiality in modern universities. This chapter outlines the process taken to establish a CoP for new staff for a multi-campus university in Australia. Results from a 12 months review highlight the benefits of the three essential elements of CoPs, namely: ‘feeling supported’ (i.e. sense of community), ‘increased total effectiveness as a staff member’, and ‘increased understanding and awareness of university systems and process’ (i.e. building of domain knowledge). The most enjoyable aspects identified by survey respondents were ‘the sharing of knowledge’ and ‘discussion’s (i.e. sharing practice). Three core issues emerged from the review and advice is shared to increase awareness of their potential presence and to help CoP facilitators head off potential problems. Future directions for the CoP are provided and the chapter concludes with some guidance to readers who might be interested in establishing a similar CoP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, D., Johnson, R., & Saha, L. (2002). Changes in academic work: Implications for universities of the changing age distribution and work roles of academic staff. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L. (2008). Younger academics’ constructions of ‘authenticity’, ‘success’ and professional identity. Studies in Higher Education, 33(4), 385–403. doi:10.1080/03075070802211729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E. (1990). To leave an indelible mark: Encouraging good teaching in research universities through faculty development: A study of the Lilly Endowment’s teaching fellows program 1974–1988. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University, Peabody College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker-Eveleth, L., Chung, Y., Eveleth, D., & O’Neill, M. (2011). Developing a community of practice through learning climate, leader support, and leader interaction. American Journal of Business Education, 4(2), 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkhuizen, G. (2002). Beginning to lecture at university: A complex of socialisation patterns. Higher Education Research and Development, 21(1), 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1692–1702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R. M., & Bieschke, K. J. (1998). Applying social cognitive theory to interest in research among counseling psychology doctoral students: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(2), 182–188. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.45.2.182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blass, E. (2005). The rise and rise of the corporate university. Journal of European Industrial Training, 29(1), 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Middleton, H. (2003). Learning from others at work: Communities of practice and informal learning. Journal of workplace Learning, 15(5), 194–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkley, S., & Du Toit, A. (2010). Academics leave your ivory tower: Form communities of practice. Educational Studies, 36(5), 493–503. doi:10.1080/03055690903425532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Queensland University. (2014). CQUniversity Australia annual report 2014. Rockhampton: Central Queensland University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, D. (2001). Voices of the academy: Academics’ responses to the corporatizing of academia. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13, 643–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. D. (1997). Long-term patterns in a mentoring program for junior faculty: Recommendations for practice. To Improve the Academy, 16, 225–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. D. (2002). The role of community in learning: Making connections for your classroom and campus, your students and colleagues. In G. S. Wheeler (Ed.), Teaching & learning in college: A resource for educators (pp. 1–38). Elyria, OH: Info-Tec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. D. (2004). Introduction to faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 2004(97), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. D. (2013). The impact of communities of practice in support of early-career academics. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. D. (2014). Learning communities as successful purveyors of evidence-based programs and scholarship: A message from the editor-in-chief. Learning Communities Journal, 6, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., & Petersen, E. B. (2005). Intellectual workers (un)doing neoliberal discourse. Critical Psychology, 13, 32–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasso, W. (2010). Facilitated networking and group formation in an online community of practice. Australian Educational Computing, 25(1), 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourlay, L. (2011). New lecturers and the myth of ‘communities of practice’. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 67–77. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2010.515570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groundwater-Smith, S. (2010). Connected Classrooms Program in Action. Sydney: Connected Classrooms Program 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, M. A., & Fassinger, R. E. (2002). The role of faculty mentors in the research training of counselling psychology doctoral students. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 49(3), 324–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, P., Tait, J., & Yorke, M. (2006). The professional learning of teachers in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, K. A., Holmes, C. M., & Hampton, D. D. (2014). The effectiveness of a college-wide research learning community in increasing the research self-efficacy of new faculty. Learning Communities Journal, 6, 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lingenfelter, P. E. (2012). Chapter 1: The knowledge economy: Challenges and opportunities for American higher education. http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/chapter-1-knowledge-economy-challenges-and-opportunities-american-higher-education

  • MacKenzie, J., Bell, S., Bohan, J., Brown, A., Burke, J., & Cogdell, B. (2010). From anxiety to empowerment: A learning community of university teachers. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(3), 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. (1999). Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management. California Management Review, 41(4), 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. (2000). Knowing in the community: 10 critical success factors in building communities of practice. IHRIM Journal, March, 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J., & Star, C. (2006). Designing the future of learning through a community of practice of teachers of first-year courses at an Australian University. In R. Philip, A. Voerman, & J. Dalziel (Eds.), Designing the future of learning: Proceedings of the first international LAMS conference (pp. 65–76). Sydney: The LAMS Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R., & Moore, S. (2008). The handbook of academic writing: A fresh approach. Cambridge: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, J., & Burch, T. (2009). Communities of Practice in Academe (CoP-iA): Understanding academic work practices to enable knowledge building capacities in corporate universities. Oxford Review of Education, 35(2), 227–247. doi:10.1080/03054980902792888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nistor, N., Daxecker, I., Stanciu, D., & Diekamp, O. (2015). Sense of community in academic communities of practice: Predictors and effects. Higher Education, 69, 257–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortquist-Ahrens, L., & Torosyan, R. (2009). The role of the facilitator in faculty learning communities: Paving the way for growth, productivity, and collegiality. Learning Communities Journal, 1(1), 29–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, P. (2002). Foreword. In W. M. McDonald & Associates (Eds.), Creating campus community: In search of Earnest Boyer’s legacy (pp. ix–xv). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parboosingh, J. (2010). Tools for CoP facilitators: Materials for CoP workshop participants. University of Calgary, http://www.coffee-ab.ca/images/toolkit-2-pagers_v1jan2010.pdf

  • Parker, L. D. (2002). It’s been a pleasure doing business with you: A strategic analysis and critique of university change management. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13, 603–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilbara Institute. (2014). CQUni to open study hub at Pilbara Institute. Retrieved 9 March 2015, http://www.pilbara.wa.edu.au/news/cqu-to-open-study-hub-at-pilbara-institute

  • Polyani, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (2007). Organized uncertainty: Designing a world of risk management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J. (1996). Great expectations: Microeconomic reform and Australia. Australia: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J. (2001). Resolving the university crisis. Submission to the Senate Employment, Workplace Relations, Small Business and Education Committee into the capacity of public universities to meet Australia’s higher education needs. Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. E. (2012). Deep change or incremental change? That depends on how easily you adapt. Retrieved 14 October 2014, http://leadingwithlift.com/2012/05/30/deep-change-or-incremental-change-that-depends-on-how-easily-you-adapt/

  • Reaburn, P., Khan, N., Kinnear, S., Owens, A., Cheney, K., Donovan, R., et al. (2014). Top ten tips: Creating and facilitating communities of practice (CoPs). Rockhampton: Central Queensland University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reaburn, P., & McDonald, J. (2015). Creating and facilitating communities of practice in higher education: Theory to practice in a regional Australian university. In J. McDonald & A. Cater-Steel (Eds.), Communities of practice—Facilitating social learning in higher education. Higher education dynamics series. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. (2006). Limits to Communities of Practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 623–639. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00618.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roblyer, M. D., & Doering, A. H. (2013). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Sydney: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H., & Moust, J. (2000). Factors affecting small group tutorial learning: A review of research. In D. Evenson & C. Hemlo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 19–52). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, L. (2000). Adoption as sensemaking: Toward an adopter-centered process model of IT adoption. Paper presented at the international conference on information systems 2000. http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1126&context=icis2000

  • Tapper, T., & Palfreyman, D. (2000). Oxford and the decline of the collegiate tradition. London: Woburn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation. (2011). Steps involved with starting communities of practice. In S. Rodger (Ed.), Title of fellowship: Building capacity among emerging occupational therapy academic leaders in curriculum renewal and evaluation of UQ and nationally. Brisbane: The University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • The University of Sydney. (2015). Origins and early years (1850–1900). http://sydney.edu.au/about/profile/history/origins.shtml

  • Walton, J. (1999). Human resource development and the corporate university. In J. Walton (Ed.), Strategic human resource development (pp. 412–437). Harlow, FT: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, J. S, & Martin, M. C. (2004). Corporate universities v traditional universities: Comparison through published organisation documentation. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED491482.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2015.

  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA, US: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. W., & Roth, R. A. (2009). Exploratory search: Beyond the query-response paradigm. San Rafael, California: Morgan & Claypool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zboralski, K. (2009). Antecedents of knowledge sharing in communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(3), 90–101. doi:10.1108/13673270910962897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elise G. C. Crawford .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crawford, E.G.C., Saluja, S. (2017). Where’s My Parking Permit? Bringing New Staff Together as a Learning Community. In: McDonald, J., Cater-Steel, A. (eds) Communities of Practice. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2879-3_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2879-3_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2877-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2879-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics