Skip to main content

“The Faculty/Faculty Conundrum”: Organizing Faculty Learning Communities to Support “Singular” and “Plural” Faculty Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Communities of Practice

Abstract

This chapter outlines the use of a modified Faculty Learning Community (FLC) model for faculty development employed within a large academic department to create communities of practice. This model promotes faculty reflection and learning about pedagogy and also serves as a means for developing projects in different aspects of the scholarship of teaching and learning. Current intra-departmental discussion of this modified FLC model revolves around a question at the heart of faculty development—what exactly is being developed? There is a sense that faculty development should be about providing faculty members the opportunity for individual development (singular “faculty”), but this can be in tension with developing the collective strength of the faculty as a whole (in the plural sense) in fulfilling its mission to the University. We use an FLC model for faculty development in this multivalent sense, to address this dilemma that we have named “the faculty/faculty conundrum.” FLCs are smaller circles within a larger community of practice intent on two goals: (1) developing individual projects in pedagogy and scholarship and (2) supporting the department mission by stimulating collaboration and creating knowledge. Our FLC model promotes faculty development in a multivalent (plural and singular) sense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barr, R. B. & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. D. (2001). Faculty learning communities: Change agents for transforming institutions into learning organizations. In D. Leiberman & C. Wehlburg (Eds.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instruction, and organizational development (Vol. 19, pp. 69–96). Bolton, MA: Anker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. D. (2004). Introduction to faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning,. doi:10.1002/tl.129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddapah, J., & Clayton, C. D. (2001). Using Wenger’s communities of practice to explore a new teacher cohort. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(1), 62–75. doi:10.1177/00224877110377507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evenbeck, S. E., Jackson, B., & McGrew, J. (1999). Faculty development in learning communities: The role of reflection and reframing. In J. H. Levine (Ed.), Learning communities: New structures, new partnerships for learning (pp. 51–58). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goto, S. T., Marshall, P., & Gaule, S. (2010). Assessment of faculty learning-communities: Considering social dimensions of participant choice. Learning Communities Journal, 2(1), 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2000). From andragogy to heutagogy. http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/dec00/hase2.htm. Accessed June 20, 2015.

  • Houghton, L., Ruutz, A., Green, W., & Hibbins, R. (2014). I just do not have time for new ideas: resistance, resonance and micro-mobilisation in a teaching community of practice. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(3), 527–540. doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.973834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. H., & Connell, N. A. D. (2008). The identification and cultivation of appropriate communities of practice in higher education. In C. Kimble, P. Hildreth, & I. Bourdon (Eds.), Communities of practice: Creating learning environments for educations (Vol. 1, pp. 65–81). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, D. A., & Guskin, A. E. (2003). The essential role of faculty development in new higher education models. In C.M. Wehlburg & S. Chadwick-Blossey (Eds.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (Vol. 21, pp. 257–272), Bolton, MA: Anker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marolla, J. (2010). A 21st-century education. In A companion to focused inquiry (pp. v–vii). Boston: Bedford/St. Matin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, C. W., & Tew, W. M. (2013). Setting the stage for teaching and learning in American Higher Education: Making the case for faculty development. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 133, 3–14. doi:10.1002/tl.20041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Refaei, B., Sipple, S., & Skutar, C. (2013). Writers groups: Composing a balanced faculty. In S. Sipple & R. Lightner (Eds.), Developing faculty learning communities at two-year colleges: collaborative models to improve teaching and learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, C. (2010). Faculty developers as institutional developers: The missing prong of organizational development. In C. Schroeder, P. Blumberg, & N. V. Chism (Eds.), Coming in from the margins: Faculty development’s emerging organizational development, note (pp. 17–46). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim, R. (2008). Adopting communities of practice as a framework for teacher development. In C. Kimble, P. Hildreth, & I. Bourdon (Eds.), Communities of practice: Creating Learning environments for educations (Vol. 1, pp. 233–251). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas J. Nelson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nelson, T.J., Cates, J.W. (2017). “The Faculty/Faculty Conundrum”: Organizing Faculty Learning Communities to Support “Singular” and “Plural” Faculty Development. In: McDonald, J., Cater-Steel, A. (eds) Communities of Practice. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2879-3_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2879-3_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2877-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2879-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics