Abstract
This chapter describes the process used to design, develop and assess a faculty-centric virtual Community of Practice (vCoP) within the environment of post-secondary educational. The primary goals for developing a faculty-centric vCoP were to provide: on-demand, multi-modal learning opportunities for globally-distributed faculty with diverse abilities, a forum for faculty members to share their ideas and best practices, and a self-supported, sustainable and scalable learning community, while increasing social capital. To guide the development of the resulting community artifact, the systems approach model was applied (Dick in The systematic design of instruction. Pearson/Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 2005). Further guided by the empirical work of Chiu (Decis Support Syst 42(3):1872–1888, 2006) regarding knowledge sharing and the development of social capital in vCoPs, as well as the 21 typology elements outlined by Dubé (Interdiscip J Inf Knowl Manag 1(1):69–93, 2006), this study extends the understanding of effective vCoP implementations. In an ever-expanding realm of instruction and the digitization of instruction within post-secondary education, a supportive Community of Practice is deemed critical to the effective dissemination of skills, techniques and information. Thus, to address this gap, a faculty-centric vCoP development framework is proposed and examined in detail. This chapter provides a comprehensive literature review, presents a theoretical framework, discusses challenges and goals of a faculty-centric vCoP, explains the framework development methodology used, highlights key findings and discusses benefits and limitations of the findings. This chapter examines a suggested development framework and processes to develop a vCoP in the post-secondary educational setting with the goal of fostering knowledge creation and knowledge sharing among participants.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, S. (2005). Communities of practice as organizational knowledge networks. Proceedings of The National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Orlando, FL, 2(25), 25–31.
Ardichvili, A. (2008). Learning and knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice: Motivators, barriers, and enablers. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10, 541–554.
Baccarini, D. (1999). The logical framework method for defining project success. Project Management Journal, 30(4), 25–32.
Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bond, M. A., & Lockee, B. B. (2014). Building virtual communities of practice for distance educators (Vol. 1). Berlin: Springer.
Boulmetis, J., & Dutwin, P. (2005). The ABCs of evaluation: Timeless techniques for program and project managers. Hoboken: Wiley.
Bradsher, M., & Hagan, L. (1995). The kids network: Student-scientists pool resources. Educational Leadership, 53(2), 38–43.
Bourhis, A., & Dubé, L. (2010). ‘Structuring spontaneity’: Investigating the impact of management practices on the success of virtual communities of practice. Journal of Information Science, 36(2), 175–193.
Bourhis, A., Dubé, L., & Jacob, R. (2005). The success of virtual communities of practice: The leadership factor. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(1), 23–34.
Chang, J., Chang, W., & Jacobs, R. (2009). Relationship between participation in communities of practice and organizational socialization in the early careers of South Korean IT employees. Human Resource Development International, 12(4), 407–427.
Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., & Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872–1888.
Cooksy, L. J., Gill, P., & Kelly, P. A. (2001). The program logic model as an integrative framework for a multimethod evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24(2), 119–128.
Cothrel, J., & Williams, R. L. (1999). On-line communities: Helping them form and grow. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(1), 54–60.
Crawford, L., & Brett, C. (2001). Exploring the role of the project sponsor. In Proceedings of the PMI New Zealand annual conference, PMINZ Wellington, New Zealand.
Crawford, P., & Bryce, P. (2003). Project monitoring and evaluation: A method for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of aid project implementation. International Journal of Project Management, 21(5), 363–373.
Denning, S. (1998). Building communities of practice. In S. Elliott, C. Henderson, & V. Powers (Eds.), Knowledge management: Lessons from the leading edge (pp. 48–50). Houston, TX: American Productivity and Quality Center.
Doran, G. T. (1981). There’s a SMART way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management Review, 70(11), 35–36.
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Dubé, L., Bourhis, A., & Jacob, R. (2006). Towards a typology of virtual communities of practice. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 1(1), 69–93.
Dvir, D., Raz, T., & Shenhar, A. J. (2003). An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), 89–95.
Fontaine, M. (2001). Keeping communities of practice afloat. Knowledge Management Review, 4(4), 16–21.
Hagen, P., & MacFarlane, J. (2008). Reflections on the role of seeding in social design. In Proceedings of the 20th Australasian conference on computer–human interaction: designing for habitus and habitat (pp. 279–282).
Halpern, D. (2005). Social capital. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hara, N., Shachaf, P., & Stoerger, S. (2009). Online communities of practice typology revisited. Journal of Information Science, 35(6), 740–757.
Hildreth, P., Kimble, C., & Wright, P. (2000). Communities of practice in the distributed international environment. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), 27–38.
Klecun, E., & Cornford, T. (2005). A critical approach to evaluation. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(3), 229–243.
Kline, J., & Alex-Brown, K. (2013). The social body of knowledge: Nurturing organizational social capital via social media based communities of practice. Technical Communication, 60(4), 279–292.
Kline, J., & Barker, T. (2012). Negotiating professional consciousness in technical communication: A community of practice approach. Technical Communication, 59(1), 32–48.
Koh, J., Kim, Y. G., Butler, B., & Bock, G. W. (2007). Encouraging participation in virtual communities. Communications of the ACM, 50(2), 68–73.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lesser, E., & Prusak, L. (1999). Communities of practice, social capital and organizational knowledge. Information Systems Review, 1(1), 3–10.
Lesser, E. L., & Storck, J. (2001). Communities of practice and organizational performance. IBM systems journal, 40(4), 831–841.
McDermott, R. (2000). Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management. Knowledge and Communities, 41(4), 21–35.
Mitchell, J. (2002). The potential for communities of practice to underpin the national training framework: Findings from an evaluation of pilot projects of communities of practice that were managed by reframing the future and funded through the Australian National Training Authority, 2001. Adelaide, South Australia: Reframing the Future/Australian National Training Authority (ANTA). Retrieved from NCVER website: http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/108459
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
Owen, J. M., & Rogers, P. J. (1999). Program evaluation: Forms and approaches (2nd ed.). St. Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
Potter, C. (2006). Program evaluation. In M. T. Blanche, K. Durrheim, & D. Painter (Eds.), Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 410–428). Cape Town: UCT Press.
Reiser, R. A., & Dick, W. (1996). Instructional planning: A guide for teachers. Allyn and Bacon.
Ríos, S. A., Aguilera, F., & Guerrero, L. A. (2009). Virtual communities of practice’s purpose evolution analysis using a concept-based mining approach. In J. Velasquez, S. Rios, R. Howlett & L. Jain (Eds.), Knowledge-based and intelligent information and engineering systems: Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 5712, pp. 480–489). Berlin: Springer. Retrieved from Springer website: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-04592-9_60
Solomon, J., & Wash, R. (2012). Bootstrapping wikis: Developing critical mass in a fledgling community by seeding content. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 261–264).
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476.
Wenger, E. (1998a). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998b). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Brighton: Harvard Business Press.
Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–145.
Xu, W., Kreijns, K., & Hu, J. (2006). Designing social navigation for a virtual community of practice. In Z. Pan, R. Aylett, H. Diener, X. Jin, S. Gobel, & L. Li (Eds.), Technologies for E-learning and digital entertainment (pp. 27–38). Berlin: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Watkins, D.R., McDaniel, A., Erskine, M.A. (2017). Building a Faculty-Centric Virtual Community of Practice (vCoP) Within the Post-secondary Education Environment: A Systems Approach Framework. In: McDonald, J., Cater-Steel, A. (eds) Communities of Practice. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2879-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2879-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2877-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2879-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)