Skip to main content

Building a Faculty-Centric Virtual Community of Practice (vCoP) Within the Post-secondary Education Environment: A Systems Approach Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Communities of Practice

Abstract

This chapter describes the process used to design, develop and assess a faculty-centric virtual Community of Practice (vCoP) within the environment of post-secondary educational. The primary goals for developing a faculty-centric vCoP were to provide: on-demand, multi-modal learning opportunities for globally-distributed faculty with diverse abilities, a forum for faculty members to share their ideas and best practices, and a self-supported, sustainable and scalable learning community, while increasing social capital. To guide the development of the resulting community artifact, the systems approach model was applied (Dick in The systematic design of instruction. Pearson/Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 2005). Further guided by the empirical work of Chiu (Decis Support Syst 42(3):1872–1888, 2006) regarding knowledge sharing and the development of social capital in vCoPs, as well as the 21 typology elements outlined by Dubé (Interdiscip J Inf Knowl Manag 1(1):69–93, 2006), this study extends the understanding of effective vCoP implementations. In an ever-expanding realm of instruction and the digitization of instruction within post-secondary education, a supportive Community of Practice is deemed critical to the effective dissemination of skills, techniques and information. Thus, to address this gap, a faculty-centric vCoP development framework is proposed and examined in detail. This chapter provides a comprehensive literature review, presents a theoretical framework, discusses challenges and goals of a faculty-centric vCoP, explains the framework development methodology used, highlights key findings and discusses benefits and limitations of the findings. This chapter examines a suggested development framework and processes to develop a vCoP in the post-secondary educational setting with the goal of fostering knowledge creation and knowledge sharing among participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, S. (2005). Communities of practice as organizational knowledge networks. Proceedings of The National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Orlando, FL, 2(25), 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardichvili, A. (2008). Learning and knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice: Motivators, barriers, and enablers. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10, 541–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baccarini, D. (1999). The logical framework method for defining project success. Project Management Journal, 30(4), 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. A., & Lockee, B. B. (2014). Building virtual communities of practice for distance educators (Vol. 1). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boulmetis, J., & Dutwin, P. (2005). The ABCs of evaluation: Timeless techniques for program and project managers. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradsher, M., & Hagan, L. (1995). The kids network: Student-scientists pool resources. Educational Leadership, 53(2), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourhis, A., & Dubé, L. (2010). ‘Structuring spontaneity’: Investigating the impact of management practices on the success of virtual communities of practice. Journal of Information Science, 36(2), 175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourhis, A., Dubé, L., & Jacob, R. (2005). The success of virtual communities of practice: The leadership factor. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(1), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J., Chang, W., & Jacobs, R. (2009). Relationship between participation in communities of practice and organizational socialization in the early careers of South Korean IT employees. Human Resource Development International, 12(4), 407–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., & Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872–1888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooksy, L. J., Gill, P., & Kelly, P. A. (2001). The program logic model as an integrative framework for a multimethod evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24(2), 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cothrel, J., & Williams, R. L. (1999). On-line communities: Helping them form and grow. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(1), 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, L., & Brett, C. (2001). Exploring the role of the project sponsor. In Proceedings of the PMI New Zealand annual conference, PMINZ Wellington, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, P., & Bryce, P. (2003). Project monitoring and evaluation: A method for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of aid project implementation. International Journal of Project Management, 21(5), 363–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denning, S. (1998). Building communities of practice. In S. Elliott, C. Henderson, & V. Powers (Eds.), Knowledge management: Lessons from the leading edge (pp. 48–50). Houston, TX: American Productivity and Quality Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, G. T. (1981). There’s a SMART way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management Review, 70(11), 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubé, L., Bourhis, A., & Jacob, R. (2006). Towards a typology of virtual communities of practice. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 1(1), 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvir, D., Raz, T., & Shenhar, A. J. (2003). An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), 89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine, M. (2001). Keeping communities of practice afloat. Knowledge Management Review, 4(4), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, P., & MacFarlane, J. (2008). Reflections on the role of seeding in social design. In Proceedings of the 20th Australasian conference on computer–human interaction: designing for habitus and habitat (pp. 279–282).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. (2005). Social capital. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara, N., Shachaf, P., & Stoerger, S. (2009). Online communities of practice typology revisited. Journal of Information Science, 35(6), 740–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, P., Kimble, C., & Wright, P. (2000). Communities of practice in the distributed international environment. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klecun, E., & Cornford, T. (2005). A critical approach to evaluation. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(3), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, J., & Alex-Brown, K. (2013). The social body of knowledge: Nurturing organizational social capital via social media based communities of practice. Technical Communication, 60(4), 279–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, J., & Barker, T. (2012). Negotiating professional consciousness in technical communication: A community of practice approach. Technical Communication, 59(1), 32–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J., Kim, Y. G., Butler, B., & Bock, G. W. (2007). Encouraging participation in virtual communities. Communications of the ACM, 50(2), 68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, E., & Prusak, L. (1999). Communities of practice, social capital and organizational knowledge. Information Systems Review, 1(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, E. L., & Storck, J. (2001). Communities of practice and organizational performance. IBM systems journal, 40(4), 831–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. (2000). Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management. Knowledge and Communities, 41(4), 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. (2002). The potential for communities of practice to underpin the national training framework: Findings from an evaluation of pilot projects of communities of practice that were managed by reframing the future and funded through the Australian National Training Authority, 2001. Adelaide, South Australia: Reframing the Future/Australian National Training Authority (ANTA). Retrieved from NCVER website: http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/108459

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J. M., & Rogers, P. J. (1999). Program evaluation: Forms and approaches (2nd ed.). St. Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, C. (2006). Program evaluation. In M. T. Blanche, K. Durrheim, & D. Painter (Eds.), Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 410–428). Cape Town: UCT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R. A., & Dick, W. (1996). Instructional planning: A guide for teachers. Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ríos, S. A., Aguilera, F., & Guerrero, L. A. (2009). Virtual communities of practice’s purpose evolution analysis using a concept-based mining approach. In J. Velasquez, S. Rios, R. Howlett & L. Jain (Eds.), Knowledge-based and intelligent information and engineering systems: Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 5712, pp. 480–489). Berlin: Springer. Retrieved from Springer website: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-04592-9_60

  • Solomon, J., & Wash, R. (2012). Bootstrapping wikis: Developing critical mass in a fledgling community by seeding content. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 261–264).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998a). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998b). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Brighton: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, W., Kreijns, K., & Hu, J. (2006). Designing social navigation for a virtual community of practice. In Z. Pan, R. Aylett, H. Diener, X. Jin, S. Gobel, & L. Li (Eds.), Technologies for E-learning and digital entertainment (pp. 27–38). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Erskine .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Watkins, D.R., McDaniel, A., Erskine, M.A. (2017). Building a Faculty-Centric Virtual Community of Practice (vCoP) Within the Post-secondary Education Environment: A Systems Approach Framework. In: McDonald, J., Cater-Steel, A. (eds) Communities of Practice. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2879-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2879-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2877-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2879-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics