Abstract
The following account tells the story of a small funding grant that launched a university-based arts project in which 40 university student volunteers designed and painted 68 concrete panels on the theme of globalisation, over a 2-year period. In the weekly project sessions, held in an underground theatre dressing-room, a community formed which embodied many of the qualities described by Lave and Wenger (Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991) as characteristic of a Community of Practice (CoP). Most notably, this project came to be one in which the participants, “share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly” (Lave and Wenger, Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, p. 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991). Initiating a voluntary, meagrely funded arts project in a university where time is short for everyone was a risky proposition, but I felt it was important to offer an opportunity to students to counter-balance the cognitively focused nature of university study. I wanted to know how Gen Y students felt about the globalised world. Also, knowing that university student life can be marked by loneliness and isolation (Sawir et al. in J Stud Int Educ 12(2):148–180, 2008), I was curious to find out whether a communal arts experience might lead to greater levels of well-being. The project participants were not fine arts students, and most had not painted ‘since kindergarten’. Nevertheless, they showed willingness, and even passion, to translate their feelings about globalisation into sketches and then into metre-long painted panels for public display. This commitment to the project endured, week after week, for 2 years, even through wintery nights and exam periods. It was at odds with some of the literature on university student engagement, which argues that contemporary Gen Y university students are pragmatically focused on gaining their qualifications and hence do not involve themselves in campus life (Levy and Campbell 2008). What kept the participants returning to the mural space? I pondered this question at many points during the 2-year project. It seemed evident that they enjoyed being there, and this was affirmed regularly in their weekly mural journals and in the project sessions. Csikszentmihalyi argued that creative acts are linked to a sense of well-being and happiness in humans (Csikszentmihalyi, The Futurist 31(5): 8–12, 1997); when this is combined with a sense of meaning, it becomes what he calls, “vital engagement”, or “a relationship to the world that is characterized both by experiences of flow (enjoyed absorption) and by meaning (subjective significance)” (Nakamura and Csikzentmihalyi 2002, p. 87). The mural participants seemed to invest a strong sense of meaning in their mural panels; they took great care in painting the images and often spent sustained periods of time in concentrated silence as they worked. Their regular attendance at the mural sessions, and also their intensity in approaching the task suggested that intrinsic motivation played a role in maintaining participants’ interest levels in the project. On the other hand, the collaborative nature of the project seemed to generate its own level of enjoyment and intrinsic motivation. In the mural space there was frequent laughter, appreciative commentary on each other’s designs, and often the sense of initial weariness transforming into focused energy in the design and painting process. It seemed that the social practice embodied in this project was also a generator of well-being for the participants. Indeed, through an “enabling, confirming and supportive process… that foster[ed] interpersonal development” (Rendon 1994, p. 44, cited in Penn-Edwards and Donnison Int J First Year High Educ 5(1): 31–41, 2014), the participants formed a cohesive learning community as they worked through the design and implementation stages of the process: creating images for their panels, rendering the images and learning how to mix and apply paint. In common with most university students, it was clear that the mural group participants already negotiated many roles in their daily lives, and had been, “socialised into multiple, overlapping communities of practice” (Morton Linguist Educ 23(1):100–111, 2012, p. 109). Nevertheless, the mural project allowed them not only to form friendships and a distinct learning community, but also to cross boundaries and gain new expertise in areas that were often remote from their disciplinary studies. In this chapter I argue that this community of practice, based around a creative arts project in an academic environment, enabled the participants to connect with each other and with their creative potentialities, with visual design and with a social form of learning that enriched their university experience.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anheier, H. K., & Isar, Y. R. (2010). Cultures and globalization: Cultural expression, creativity and innovation. http://latrobe.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=537762
Ashton-Hay, S. A., & Roberts, R. (2012). Financial reporting: Towards socially inclusive support for international students. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 6(2), A14–A28.
Australian Education for Sustainability Alliance. (2014). The state of education for sustainability in Australia Report (pp. 1–6). Australia.
Baird, C. (2012). Targeted, timely, learning support for international students: One Australian university’s approach. Journal of Learning Design, 5(1), 52–62.
Ball, S. J. (2012). Performativity, commodification and commitment: An I-spy guide to the neoliberal university. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(1), 17–28.
Barlett, P. F. (2008). Reason and re-enchantment in cultural change. Current Anthropology, 49(6), 1077–1098.
Bateson, P. (2015). Playfulness and creativity. Current Biology, 25(1), R12–R16. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.009
Beresin, E. V., Balon, R., Coverdale, J. H., & Louie, A. K. (2015). This is water revisited: Creativity lost. Academic Psychiatry, 39(4), 472–474.
Carlile, O., & Jordan, A. (2012). Approaches to creativity. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
Chan, Z. (2013). Exploring creativity and critical thinking in traditional and innovative problem-based learning groups. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22(15–16), 2298–2307.
Churchman, D., & Stehlik, T. (2007). Transforming academic work: Communities of practice in Australian universities. Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change, 4(3), 263–278. doi:10.1386/jots.4.3.263_1
Clegg, S., Stevenson, J., & Willott, J. (2010). Staff conceptions of curricular and extracurricular activities in higher education. Higher Education, 59(5), 615–626.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention (1st ed.). NY: Harper Perennial.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Happiness and creativity. The Futurist, 31(5), 8–12.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2004). Flow: Psychology, creativity, & optimal experience with Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi into the classroom media [Recorded interview]. https://www.kanopystreaming.com/product/flow-psychology-creativity-optimal-experie
De Botton, A., & Armstrong, J. (2013). Art as therapy. London: Phaidon Press.
Floyd, C. B. (2015). Closing the gap: International student pathways, academic performance and academic acculturation. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 9(2), A1–A18.
Friedman, M. B. (2014). Creativity and pychological well-being. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 6(2), 39–58.
Geirland, J. (1996). Go with the flow: An interview with Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Wired Magazine, 4(9). https://www.wired.com/1996/09/czik/
Harvey, S. (2013). A different perspective: The multiple effects of deep level diversity on group creativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 822–832.
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 569–598. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
Hooker, C., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Flow, creativity, and shared leadership. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 217–234). Boston MA: Sage Publications Inc.
Hughes, J., Jewson, N., & Unwin, L. (2013). Communities of practice: Critical perspectives. http://latrobe.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1166453
Huizinga, J., & Hull, R. F. C. (1949). Homo ludens. A study of the play-element in culture. [Translated by RFC Hull.]. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Ingleby, E. (2015). The house that Jack built: Neoliberalism, teaching in higher education and the moral objections. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(5), 1–12.
James, N. (2007). The learning trajectories of ‘old-timers’: Academic identities and communities of practice in higher education. Communities of practice: Critical perspectives, 131–143.
http://latrobe.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1069445
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lemke, J. (Ed.). (2013). Feeling and meaning in the social ecology of learning. Lessons from play and games Hoboken. London: Taylor and Francis.
Levy, S., & Campbell, H. (2008). Student motivation: Premise, effective practice and policy. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(5).
Lozano, R. (2011). The state of sustainability reporting in universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(1), 67–78. doi:10.1108/14676371111098311
MacLaren, I. (2012). The contradictions of policy and practice: Creativity in higher education. London Review of Education, 10(2), 159–172.
McNiff, S. (2007). Empathy with the shadow: Engaging and transforming difficulties through art. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 47(3), 392–399.
Mendenhall, M. E., & Hillstrom, L. (2006). Creativity. In M. M. Helms (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Management (5th ed., pp. 149–150). Detroit: Gale.
Montgomery, C., & McDowell, L. (2009). Social networks and the international student experience an international community of practice? Journal of Studies in International Education, 13(4), 455–466.
Morton, J. (2012). Communities of practice in higher education: A challenge from the discipline of architecture. Linguistics and Education, 23(1), 100–111.
Mueller, J., & Cronin, M. A. (2009). How relational processes support team creativity. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 12, 291–310.
Murphy, P. (2013). Beautiful minds and ugly buildings. In M. A. Peters & T. Besley (Eds.), The creative university (pp. 9–33). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Nagy, J. (2014). Leadership in the academy-collegiate methods to achieve corporate goals. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 101–109.
Nakamura, J. (2001). The nature of vital engagement in adulthood. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2001(93), 5–18. doi:10.1002/cd.21
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The construction of meaning through vital engagement. In C. Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing (pp. 83–104). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.
Ng, L. L., & Pemberton, J. (2013). Research-based communities of practice in UK higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(10), 1522–1539.
Nistor, N., Daxecker, I., Stanciu, D., & Diekamp, O. (2015). Sense of community in academic communities of practice: Predictors and effects. Higher Education, 69(2), 257–273. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9773-6
Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.
Penn-Edwards, S., & Donnison, S. (2014). A fourth generation approach to transition in the first year in higher education: First year in higher education community of practice (FYHECoP). International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 5(1), 31–41.
Phipps, A. (2010). Drawing breath: Creative elements and their exile from higher education. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 9(1), 42–53.
Prosser, J. (2011). Visual methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (p. 479). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Quinn, J. H. (2010). Learning communities and imagined social capital: Learning to belong. In Continuum studies in educational research (Vol. 1). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Sawir, E., Marginson, S., Deumert, A., Nyland, C., & Ramia, G. (2008). Loneliness and international students: An Australian study. Journal of Studies in International Education, 12(2), 148–180.
Snyder, W. M., & Wenger, E. (2010). Our world as a learning system: A communities-of-practice approach. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social learning systems and communities of practice (pp. 107–124). Berlin: Springer.
Tieu, T.-T., & Pancer, S. (2009). Cocurricular involvement and first-year students’ transition to university: Quality vs. quantity of involvement. Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 21(1), 43–63.
Vicars, M., & Senior, K. (2013). Making a visible difference: Overcoming barriers using arts-based learning. Educational Action Research, 21(1), 59–71.
Walker, C. J. (2010). Experiencing flow: Is doing it together better than doing it alone? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 3–11.
Wang, D., Waldman, D. A., & Zhang, Z. (2014). A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 181.
Ward, S. C. (2012). Neoliberalism and the global restructuring of knowledge and education. http://latrobe.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=958758
Weber, S. (2014). Arts-based self-study: Documenting the ripple effect. Perspectives in Education: Self-study of Educational Practice: Re-Imagining our Pedagogies, 32(2), 8–20.
Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fegan, S. (2017). Imagining the World: Creating an Artistic Community of Practice in an Academic Environment. In: McDonald, J., Cater-Steel, A. (eds) Implementing Communities of Practice in Higher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2866-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2866-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2865-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2866-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)