Advertisement

Effects of Different Trust on Team Creativity: Taking Knowledge Sharing as a Mediator

  • Jiangning WuEmail author
  • Hang Zhao
  • Donghua Pan
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 660)

Abstract

In the highly dynamic and competitive environment, firms increasingly rely on teams and their members’ creativity to survive and succeed. Trust has been found to be the critical antecedent of team creativity, whereas what forms of trust and to what extent the trust can affect team creativity are still unexplored comprehensively. In this respect, the article synthesizes three different types of trust and explores their effect mechanisms on team creativity as well as the role of knowledge sharing in mediating the relationship between trust and team creativity. A survey is conducted to a sample of 61 project teams comprising 409 members from small and medium-sized Chinese firms in Dalian. The findings suggest that there exist different ways for trust to affect team creativity through knowledge sharing, of which calculative trust and institutional trust improve the team creativity by sharing the explicit knowledge, and relational trust ad hoc cognitive trust positively contributes to team creativity through sharing the tacit knowledge.

Keywords

Trust Team creativity Knowledge sharing Calculative trust Relational trust Institutional trust 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work is fully sponsored by the projects of Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant Nos. 71271036 and 71471028.

References

  1. Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., Herron, M.: Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad. Manag. J. 39(5), 1154–1184 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barczak, G., Lassk, F., Mulki, J.: Antecedents of team creativity: an examination of team emotional intelligence, team trust and collaborative culture. Creativity Innov. Manag. 19(4), 332–345 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A.: The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51(6), 1173–1182 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bidault, F., Castello, A.: Trust and creativity: understanding the role of trust in creativity-oriented joint development. R&D Manag. 39(3), 259–270 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bock, G.W., Kim, Y.G.: Breaking the myths of rewards: an exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. In: PACIS 2001 Proceedings, p. 78 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. Bock, G.W., Zmud, R.W., Kim, Y.G., Lee, J.N.: Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Q. 29, 87–111 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. Butler, J.K.: Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. J. Manag. 17(3), 643–663 (1991)Google Scholar
  8. Chae, S., Seo, Y., Lee, K.C.: Effects of task complexity on individual creativity through knowledge interaction: a comparison of temporary and permanent teams. Comput. Hum. Behav. 42(4), 138–148 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, M.H., Chang, Y.C., Hung, S.C.: Social capital and creativity in R&D project teams. R&D Manag. 38(1), 21–34 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chu, H.N.: The research of enterprise interpersonal trust and its impact on knowledge sharing in Chinese culture environment. Doctoral Dissertation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (2008). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Gulati, R.: Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Manag. J. 38, 85–112 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holste, J.S., Fields, D.: Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. J. Knowl. Manag. 14(1), 128–140 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee, D.S., Seo, Y.W., Lee, K.C.: Individual and team differences in self-reported creativity by shared leadership and individual knowledge in an e-learning environment. Information 14(9), 2931–2946 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. Lin, M.J.J., Hung, S.W., Chen, C.J.: Fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing in professional virtual communities. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(4), 929–939 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McAllister, D.J.: Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 38(1), 24–59 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(3), 709–734 (1995)Google Scholar
  17. Moorman, C., Deshpande, R., Zaltman, G.: Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. J. Mark. 57, 81–101 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Polanyi, M.: The Tacit Dimension. Routledge, London (1966)Google Scholar
  19. Tsai, W.: Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intra-organizational linkages. Strateg. Manag. J. 21(9), 925–939 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., Camerer, C.: Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(3), 393–404 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sharifirad, M.S.: Can incivility impair team’s creative performance through paralyzing employee’s knowledge sharing? A multi-level approach. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 37(2), 200–225 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shazi, R., Gillespie, N., Steen, J.: Trust as a predictor of innovation network ties in project teams. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33(1), 81–91 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shin, S.J., Zhou, J.: When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. J. Appl. Psychol. 92, 1709–1721 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wong, Y.T., Ngo, H.Y., Wong, C.S.: Antecedents and outcomes of employees’ trust in Chinese joint ventures. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 20(4), 481–499 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Systems EngineeringDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations