Advertisement

Increasing Phytoremediation Efficiency of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soil Using PGPR for Sustainable Agriculture

  • Payman Abbaszadeh-Dahaji
  • Mahtab Omidvari
  • Mansour GhorbanpourEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Raising industrial activities and agricultural practices as well as other human anthropogenic actions adds a significant amount of heavy metals in soil and water, resulting in degradation of the environment. Some examples of the environmental concern metals are nickel, copper, arsenic, lead, cadmium, cobalt, and zinc. Due to their nonbiodegradable nature, toxic heavy metals accumulate in the environment and therefore contaminate the food chain. The presence of these hazardous metals further than the threshold limit exhibits a critical threat to the human health and total environment. Different physical, chemical, and biological procedures have been applied for the remediation of contaminants from the environment. Bioremediation is the application of biological remedy for cleanup and or mitigation of contaminants from the environment. This process is a cost-effective and worthwhile method for removal of heavy metal-contaminated soil compared to physicochemical remediation techniques which are expensive and deleterious for soil properties. Phytoremediation is defined as the direct use of appropriate living plants for removal, degradation, or sequester of contaminants from environments (atmosphere, hydrosphere, and lithosphere). The efficiency of phytoremediation depends on many factors like plant biomass yield, plant tolerance to metal toxicity, and heavy metal solubility or mobilization in the soil.

The success of the phytoremediation process can be attained through developing the association of hyperaccumularor plant species with microorganisms like heavy metal-resistant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria.

Keywords

Heavy Metal Endophytic Bacterium Phytoremediation Process Phytoremediation Efficiency Heavy Metal Solubility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abbaszadeh P, Saleh-Rastin N, Asadi-Rahmani H, Khavazi K, Soltani A, Shoary-Nejati AR, Miransari M (2010) Plant growth-promoting activities of fluorescent pseudomonads, isolated from the Iranian soils. Acta Physiol Plant 32:281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbaszadeh-dahaji P, Savaghebi GR, Asadi-rahmani H, Rejali F, Farahbakhsh M, Moteshareh-zadeh B, Omidvari M, Lindstrom K (2012) Symbiotic effectiveness and plant growth promoting traits in some Rhizobium strains isolated from Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Growth Regul 68:361–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abdelatey LM, Khalil WK, Ali TH, Mahrous KF (2011) Heavy metal resistance and gene expression analysis of metal resistance genes in gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria present in egyptian soils. J Appl Sci Env San 6:201–211Google Scholar
  4. Abou-Shanab RA, Angle JS, Delorme TA, Chaney RL, van Berkum P, Moawad H, Ghanem K, Ghozlan HA (2003) Rhizobacterial effects on nickel extraction from soil and uptake by Alyssum murale. New Phytol 158:219–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Abou-Shanab RAI, Angle JS, Chaney RL (2006) Bacterial inoculants affecting nickel uptake by Alyssum murale from low, moderate and high Ni soils. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2882–2889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Adediran GA, Ngwenya BT, Mosselmans JFW, Heal KV, Harvie BA (2016) Mixed planting with a leguminous plant outperforms bacteria in promoting growth of a metal remediating plant through histidine synthesis. Int J Phytoremediation 18(7):720–729CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ahmad P, Sharma S, Srivastava PS (2006) Differential physio-biochemical responses of high yielding varieties of Mulberry (Morus alba) under alkalinity (Na2CO3) stress in vitro. J Plant Physiol Mol Biol 12:59–66Google Scholar
  8. Ahmad F, Ahmad I, Khan M (2008) Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiol Res 163:173–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ali H, Khan E, Sajad MA (2013) Phytoremediation of heavy metals concepts and applications. Chemosphere 91:869–881CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Arora K, Sharma S, Monti A (2016) Bio-remediation of Pb and Cd polluted soils by switch grass: A case study in India. Int J Phytoremediation 18(7):704–709CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Arshad M, Saleem M, Hussain S (2007) Perspectives of bacterial ACC deaminase in phytoremediation. Tren Biotech 25(8):356–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Babalola OO (2010) Beneficial bacteria of agricultural importance. Biotechnol Lett 32(11):1559–1570CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Barrutia O, Garbisu C, Hernandez-Allica J, Garcıa-Plazaola JI, Becerril JM (2010) Differences in EDTA-assisted metal phytoextraction between metallicolous and non-metallicolous accessions of Rumex acetosa L. Environ Pollut 58:1710–1715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Belimov AA, Hontzeas N, Safronova VI, Demchinskaya SV, Piluzza G, Bullitta S, Glick BR (2005) Cadmium-tolerant plant growth-promoting bacteria associated with the roots of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern.). Soil Biol Biochem 37:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bharti RP, Shri Vastava A, Soni N, Tiwari A, More S, Ram Choudhary J (2014) Phytoremediation of heavy metal toxicity and role of soil in rhizobacteria. Int J Sci Res Pub 4(1):1–5Google Scholar
  16. Bhattacharyya PN, Jha DK (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:1327–1350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bolan N, Kunhikrishnan A, Thangarajan R, Kumpiene J, Park J, Makino T, Kirkham MB, Scheckel K (2014) Remediation of heavy metal(loid)s contaminated soils–to mobilize or to immobilize? J Hazard Mater 266:141–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Boyd RS (2010) Heavy metal pollutants and chemical ecology: exploring new frontiers. J Chem Ecol 36(1):46–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Braud A, Jezequel K, Vieille E, Tritter A, Lebeau T (2006) Changes in extractability of Cr and Pb in a polycontaminated soil after bioaugmentation with microbial producers of biosurfactants, organic acids and siderophores. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 6:261–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Braud A, Jezequel K, Bazot S, Lebeau T (2009) Enhanced phytoextraction of an agricultural Cr-, Hg and Pb-contaminated soil by bioaugmentation with siderophore producing bacteria. Chemosphere 74:280–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Burd GI, Dixon DG, Glick BR (1998) A plant growth promoting bacterium that decreases nickel toxicity in plant seedlings. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3663–3668PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Carrillo-Castaneda G, Munoz JJ, Peralta-Videa JR, Gomez E, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2003) Plant growth promoting bacteria promote copper and iron translocation from root to shoot in alfalfa seedlings. J Plant Nutr 26:1801–1814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chaudhary K, Khan S (2015) Review: plant microbe-interaction in heavy metal contaminated soils. Indian Res J Genet Biotech 7(2):235–240Google Scholar
  24. Chen YP, Rekha PD, Arunshen AB, Lai WA, Young CC (2006) Phosphate solubilizing bacteria from subtropical soil and their tricalcium phosphate solubilizing abilities. Appl Soil Ecol 34:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chirakkara RA, Reddy KR (2015) Plant species identification for phytoremediation of mixed contaminated soils. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste 19(4):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chung H, Park M, Madhaiyan M, Seshadri S, Song J, Cho H, Sa T (2005) Isolation and characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacteria from the rhizosphere of crop plants of Korea. Soil Biol Biochem 37(10):1970–1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dary M, Chamber-Pérez MA, Palomares AJ, Pajuelo E (2010) In situ phytostabilisation of heavy metal polluted soils using Lupinus luteus inoculated with metal resistant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. J Hazard Mater 177:323–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. DeBashan LE, Hernandez JP, Bashan Y (2012) The potential contribution of plant growth promoting bacteria to reduce environmental degradation. A comprehensive evaluation. Appl Soil Ecol 61:171–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dimkpa C, Weinand T, Asch F (2009a) Plant–rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell Environ 32(12):1682–1694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Dimkpa CO, Merten D, Svatos A, Büchel G, Kothe E (2009b) Siderophores mediate reduced and increased uptake of cadmium by Streptomyces tendae F4 and sunflower (Helianthus annuus), respectively. J Appl Microbiol 107:1687–1696CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Evangelou MWH, Bauer U, Ebel M, Schaeffer A (2007) The influence of EDDS and EDTA on the uptake of heavy metals of Cd and Cu from soil with tobacco Nicotiana tabacum. Chemosphere 68:345–353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Friml J, Vieten A, Sauer M, Weijers D, Schwarz H, Hamann T, Offringa R, Jurgens G (2003) Efflux-dependent auxin gradients establish the apical-basal axis of Arabidopsis. Nature 426:147–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gadd GM (2004) Microbial influence on metal mobility and application for bioremediation. Geoderma 122:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gadd GM (2010) Metals, minerals and microbes: geomicrobiology and bioremediation. Microbiology 156:609–643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ghorbanpour M, Hatami M (2014) Biopriming of Salvia officinalis L. seed with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) changes the invigoration and primary growth indices. J Biol Environ Sci 8:29–36Google Scholar
  36. Ghorbanpour M, Hatami M, Khavazi K (2013) Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on antioxidant enzyme activities and tropane alkaloid production of Hyoscyamus niger under water deficit stress. Turk J Biol 37:350–360Google Scholar
  37. Ghorbanpour M, Hatami M, Kariman K, Abbaszadeh DP (2016) Phytochemical variations and enhanced efficiency of antioxidant and antimicrobial ingredients in Salvia officinalis as inoculated with different rhizobacteria. Chem Biodivers 13(3):319–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Glick BR (2005) Modulation of plant ethylene levels by the bacterial enzyme ACC deaminase. FEMS Microbiol Lett 251:1–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Glick BR (2010) Using soil bacteria to facilitate phytoremediation. Biotechnol Adv 28:367–487CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Glick BR, Patten CL, Holguin G, Penrose DM (1999) Biochemical and genetic mechanisms used by plant growth promoting bacteria. Imperial College Press, London, p 267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Glick BR, Cheng Z, Czarny J, Duan J (2007) Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase producing soil bacteria. Eur J Plant Pathol 119(3):329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. He CQ, Tan GE, Liang X, Du W, Chen YL, Zhi GY, Zhu Y (2010) Effect of Zn-tolerant bacterial strains on growth and Zn accumulation in Orychophragmus violaceus. Appl Soil Ecol 44:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Huang XD, El-Alawi Y, Gurska J, Glick BR, Greenberg BM (2005) A multi-process phytoremediation system for decontamination of persistent total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) from soils. Microchem J 81:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hutchinson SL, Schwab AP, Banks MK (2003) Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in the rhizosphere. In: McCutcheon SC, Schnoor JL (eds) Phytoremediation: transformation and control of contaminants Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Ismande J (1998) Iron, sulfur and chlorophyll deficiencies: a need for an integrative approach in plant physiology. Physiol Plant 103:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jalili F, Khavazi K, Pazira E, Nejati A, Asadi Rahmani H, Rasuli Sadaghiani H, Miransari M (2009) Isolation and characterization of ACC deaminase producing fluorescent pseudomonads, to alleviate salinity stress on canola (Brassica napus L.) growth. J Plant Physiol 166:667–674CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Jamil M, Zeb S, Anees M, Roohi A, Ahmed I, Rehman S, Rha ES (2014) Role of Bacillus licheniformis in phytoremediationof nickel contaminated soil cultivated with rice. Int J Phytorem 16(6):554–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Janmohammadi M, Bihamta M, Ghasemzadeh F (2013) Influence of rhizobacteria inoculation and lead stress on the physiological and biochemical attributes of wheat genotypes. Cercet Agron Moldova 46:49–67Google Scholar
  49. John R, Ahmad P, Gadgil K, Sharma S (2009) Heavy metal toxicity: effect on plant growth, biochemical parameters and metal accumulation by Brassica juncea L. Int J Plant Prod 3:65–76Google Scholar
  50. Juwarkar AA, Nair A, Dubey KV, Singh SK, Devotta S (2007) Biosurfactant technology for remediation of cadmium and lead contaminated soils. Chemosphere 10:1996–2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kamran MA, Syed JH, Eqani SAMAS, Munis MFH, Chaudhary HJ (2015) Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria inoculation on cadmium (Cd) uptake by Eruca sativa. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:9275–9283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kang BG, Kim WT, Yun HS, Chang SC (2010) Use of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to control stress responses of plant roots. Plant Biotechnol Rep 4(3):179–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Khakipour N, Khavazi K, Mojallali H, Pazira E, Asadirahmani H (2008) Production of auxin hormone by fluorescent pseudomonads. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 4:687–692Google Scholar
  54. Khalid A, Arshad M, Zahir AA (2004) Screening plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for improving growth and yield of wheat. J Appl Microbiol 96:473–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Khan MS, Zaidi A, Wani PA (2007) Role of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms in sustainable agriculture a review. Agron Sustain Dev 27:29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Khan MS, Zaidi A, Wani PA, Oves M (2009) Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the remediation of metal contaminated soils. Environ Chem Lett 7:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Laghlimi M, Baghdad B, El Hadi H, Bouabdli A (2015) Phytoremediation mechanisms of heavy metal contaminated soils: a review. Open J Ecol 5:375–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lambert M, Leven B, Green R (2000) New methods of cleaning up heavy metal in soils and water. Environmental science and technology briefs for citizens. Kansas State University, ManhattanGoogle Scholar
  59. Li K, Ramakrishna W (2011) Effect of multiple metal resistant bacteria from contaminated lake sediments on metal accumulation and plant growth. J Hazard Mater 189:531–539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Li WC, Ye ZH, Wong MH (2007) Effects of bacteria on enhanced metal uptake of the Cd/Zn-hyperaccumulating plant, Sedum alfredii. J Exp Bot 58:4173–4182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Ma Y, Prasad MNV, Rajkumar M, Freitas H (2011) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and endophytes accelerate phytoremediation of metalliferous soils. Biotechnol Adv 29:248–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Ma Y, Rajkumar M, Luo Y, Freitas H (2013) Phytoextraction of heavy metal polluted soils using Sedum plumbizincicola inoculated with metal mobilizing Phyllobacterium myrsinacearum RC6b. Chemosphere 93:1383–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Marques APGC, Rangel AOSS, Castro PML (2009) Remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils: phytoremediation as a potentially promising clean-up technology. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 39:622–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Marques APGC, Pires C, Moreira H, Rangel AOSS, Castro PML (2010) Assessment of the plant growth promotion abilities of six bacterial isolates using Zea mays as indicator plant. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1229–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR (2004) Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants under salt stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 42:565–572CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. McCutcheon SC, Schnoor JL (2003) Over view of phytotransformation and control of wastes. In: McCutcheon SC, Schnoor JL (eds) Phytoremediation: transformation and control of contaminants, Wiley, NewYork, pp 3–58Google Scholar
  67. Mishra V, Gupta A, Kaur P, Simranjeet S, Singh N, Gehlot P, Singh J (2016) Synergistic effects of Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in bioremediation of iron contaminated soils. Int J Phytoremediation 18(7):704–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Modirroosta S, Ardalan MM, Bayramzadeh V (2014) Impact of soil cadmium contamination on accumulation of cadmium and proline content of Pinus sylvestris L. Seedling Agric Sci Dev 3(2):167–172Google Scholar
  69. Motesharezadeh B, Savaghebi-Firoozabadi GR (2011) Study of the increase in phytoremediation efficiency in a nickel polluted soil by the usage of native bacteria: Bacillus safensis FO.036b and Micrococcus roseus M2. Caspian J Env Sci 9(2):133–143Google Scholar
  70. Patten CL, Glick BR (2002) Role of Pseudomonas putida indole-acetic acid in development of the host plant root system. Appl Environ Microbiol l8:3795–3801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pereira SIA, Barbosa L, Castro PML (2015) Rhizobacteria isolated from a metal-polluted area enhance plant growth in zinc and cadmium-contaminated soil. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:2127–2142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Petriccione M, Di Patre D, Ferrante P, Papa S, Bartoli G, Fioretto A, Scortichini M (2013) Effects of Pseudomonas fluorescens seed bioinoculation on heavy metal accumulation for Mirabilis jalapa phytoextraction in smelter-contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1–17Google Scholar
  73. Pilon-Smits E (2005) Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56:15–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Ping L, Boland W (2004) Signals from the underground: bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci 9:263–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Rajkumar M, Ae N, Freitas H (2009) Endophytic bacteria and their potential to enhance heavy metal phytoextraction. Chemosphere 77:153–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Rajkumar M, Prasad MNV, Freitas H (2010) Potential of siderophore producing bacteria for improving heavy metal phytoextraction. Trends Biotechnol l28:142–149Google Scholar
  77. Rajkumar M, Sandhya S, Prasad MNV, Freitas H (2012) Perspectives of plant-associated microbes in heavy metal phytoremediation. Biotechnol Adv 30:1562–1574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Raskin I, Smith RD, Salt DE (1997) Phytoremediation of metals: using plants to remove pollutants from the environment. Curr Opin Biotechnol 8:221–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Saleem M, Arshad M, Hussain S, Bhatti AS (2007) Perspective of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) containing ACC deaminase in stress agriculture. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 34:635–648CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Saravanan VS, Madhaiyan M, Thangaraju M (2007) Solubilization of zinc compounds by the diazotrophic, plant growth promoting bacterium Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus. Chemosphere 66:1794–1798CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Sessitsch A, Kuffner M, Kidd P, Vangronsveld J, Wenzel WW, Fallmann K, Puschenreiter M (2013) The role of plant-associated bacteria in the mobilization and phytoextraction of trace elements in contaminated soils. Soil Biol Biochem 60:182–194CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. Sheng XF, Xia JJ, Jiang CY, He LY, Qian M (2008) Characterization of heavy metal-resistant endophytic bacteria from rape (Brassica napus) roots and their potential in promoting the growth and lead accumulation of rape. Environ Pollut 156:1164–1170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Sheoran V, Sheoran A, Poonia P (2011) Role of hyperaccumulators in phytoextraction of metals from contaminated mining sites: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 41:168–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stepanova AN, Robertson-Hoyt J, Yun J, Benavente LM, Xie DY, Dolezˇal K, Jürgens SG, Alonso JM (2008) TAA1-mediated auxin biosynthesis is essential for hormone crosstalk and plant development. Cell 133:177–191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Sun Y, Cheng Z, Glick B (2009) The presence of a 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase deletion mutation alters the physiology of the endophytic plant growth-promoting bacterium Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN. FEMS Microbiol Lett 296:31–36Google Scholar
  86. Suthersan SS (1999) Phytoremediation: remediation engineering-design concepts. CRC Press LLC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  87. Ullah A, Mushtaq H, Ali H, Munis MFH, Javed MT, Chaudhary HJ (2015) Diazotrophs assisted phytoremediation of heavy metals: a novel approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:2505–2710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Vidyapith B, Rajasthan BT (2014) Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on plant growth and flouride (f) uptake by F hyperaccumulator plant prosopis juliflora. Int J Recent Sci Res 5(11):1995–1999Google Scholar
  89. Wang Q, Xiong D, Zhao P, Yu X, Tu B, Wang G (2011) Effect of applying an arsenic-resistant and plant growth promoting rhizobacterium to enhance soil arsenic phytoremediation by Populus deltoides LH05-17. J Appl Microbiol 111:1065–1074CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Wei SH, Teixeira da Silva JA, Zhou QX (2008) Agro-improving method of phytoextracting heavy metal contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 150:662–668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Whiting SN, deSouza MP, Norman T (2001) Rhizosphere bacteria mobilize Zn for hyperaccumulation by Thlaspi caerulescens. Environ Sci Technol 35:3144–3150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Wuana RA, Okieimen FE (2011) Heavy metals in contaminated soil: a sources review of, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for bioremediation. ISRN Ecology 2011:20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Yu X, Li Y, Zhang C, Liu H, Liu J, Zheng W, Kang X, Leng X, Zhao K, Gu Y, Zhang X, Xiang Q, Chen Q (2014) Culturable heavy metal-resistant and plant growth promoting bacteria in v-ti magnetite mine tailing soil from Panzhihua, China. Plos One 9(9):1–8Google Scholar
  94. Yu Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Zhang X, Meng X, Lu Z (2015) Improvement of heavy metal resistant bacteria on phytoremediation of reclaimed land using coal gangue. J Residuals Sci Tech 12(1):105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zaidi S, Usmani S, Singh BR, Musarrat J (2006) Significance of Bacillus subtilis strain SJ-101 as a bioinoculant for concurrent plant growth promotion and nickel accumulation in Brassica juncea. Chemosphere 64:991–997CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Payman Abbaszadeh-Dahaji
    • 1
  • Mahtab Omidvari
    • 2
  • Mansour Ghorbanpour
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Agriculture, Faculty of Soil ScienceUniversity of Vali-e-AsrRafsanjanIran
  2. 2.Department of Plant PathologyUniversity of TehranKarajIran
  3. 3.Department of Medicinal Plants, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural ResourcesArak UniversityArakIran

Personalised recommendations