Skip to main content

Rupture of the Uterus Scarred Due to Previous Caesarean Section

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 404 Accesses

Abstract

A 24-year-old primigravida married for 1 year was referred from a village in the second stage of labour with an intrauterine foetal demise to the emergency room. There was mild tachycardia. She was not anaemic. The blood pressure was normal. A midline vertical sub-umbilical scar on the abdomen was claimed to be for an ovariotomy done during adolescence. The patient was exhausted. There was secondary inertia of the uterus. Vaginal examination confirmed full dilatation with fully rotated vertex at +2 station. Forceps delivery was uneventfully performed to deliver a 2.8 kg dead baby. Massive postpartum haemorrhage followed the delivery. There was no trauma to the lower genital tract. Since the brisk bleeding very quickly started exsanguinating the patient, she was taken up for urgent laparotomy, only to realize there was transverse rupture of a previous hysterotomy scar (Fig. 2.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(2 Pt 1):450–63.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmadi F, Shiva S, Akhbari F. Incomplete cesarean scar rupture. J Reprod Infertil. 2013;14(1):43–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Zirqi I, Stray-Pedersen B, Forsen L, et al. Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section. BJOG. 2010;117(7):809–20. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02533.x.Epub2010M.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Zirqi I, Stray-Pedersen B, Forsén L, Daltveit AK, Vangen S. Uterine rupture: trends over 40 years. BJOG. 2015;123(5):780–7. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13394 [Epub ahead of print].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Andersen MM, Thisted DL, Amer-Wåhlin I, Krebs L, Danish CTG, Monitoring during VBAC study group. Can intrapartum cardiotocography predict uterine rupture among women with prior caesarean delivery?: a population-based case-control study. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0146347. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146347. eCollection 2016.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Birara M, Gebrehiwot Y. Factors associated with the success of vaginal birth after one caesarean section (VBAC) at three teaching hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a case control study. BMC Pregnancy Childb. 2013;13:31. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-13-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blumenfeld YJ, Caughey AB, El-Sayed YY, Daniels K, Lyell DJ. Single- versus double-layer hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and bladder adhesions. BJOG. 2010;117(6):690–4. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02529.x. Epub 2010 Mar 12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bolla D, Raio L, Favre D, Papadia A, In-Albon S, Mueller MD. Laparoscopic ultrasound-guided repair of uterine scar isthmocele connected with the extra-amniotic space in early pregnancy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(2):261–4. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Sep 25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brahmalakshmy BL, Kushtagi P. Variables influencing the integrity of lower uterine segment in post-cesarean pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291(4):755–62. doi:10.1007/s00404-014-3455-6. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bujold E, Goyet M, Marcoux S, Brassard N, Cormier B, Hamilton E, Abdous B, Sidi EA, Kinch R, Miner L, Masse A, Fortin C, Gagné GP, Fortier A, Bastien G, Sabbah R, Guimond P, Roberge S, Gauthier RJ. The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(1):43–50. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e41be3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J, Brunet S, Gauthier RJ. Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(3):320. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.014.e1-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. CAESAR study collaborative group. Caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised factorial trial (CAESAR). BJOG. 2010;117(11):1366–76. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02686.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen A, Cohen Y, Laskov I, Maslovitz S, Lessing JB, Many A. Persistent abdominal pain over uterine scar during labor as a predictor of delivery complications. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;123(3):200–2. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.06.018. Epub 2013 Aug 31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. The CORONIS Collaborative Group. CORONIS – the International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: the follow-up study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:215. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-13-215. Published online 2013 Nov 21.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Dekker GA, Chan A, Luke CG, Priest K, Riley M, Halliday J, King JF, Gee V, O’Neill M, Snell M, Cull V, Cornes S. Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2010;117(11):1358–65. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02688.x. Epub 2010 Aug 17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Desseauve D, Bonifazi-Grenouilleau M, Fritel X, Lathélize J, Sarreau M, Pierre F. Fetal heart rate abnormalities associated with uterine rupture: a case-control study: a new time-lapse approach using a standardized classification. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;197:16–21. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.10.019. Epub 2015 Dec 2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography (October 2015) http://www.figo.org/news/available-view-figo-intrapartum-fetal-monitoring-guidelines-0015088. Accessed on 16 Apr 2016.

  18. Fitzpatrick KE, Kurinczuk JJ, Alfirevic Z, Spark P, Brocklehurst P, Knight M. Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: a national case-control study. PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001184. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001184. Epub 2012 Mar 13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Flamm BL, Geiger AM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an admission scoring system. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:907.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Guise J-M, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman MA, Marshall N, Fu R, Janik R, Nygren P, Walker M, McDonagh M. Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No.191. (Prepared by the Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10057-I). AHRQ Publication No. 10-E003. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. March 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hamar BD, Levine D, Katz NL, Lim KH. Expectant management of uterine dehiscence in the second trimester of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:1139–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Haresh UD, Rohit KJ, Aarti AV. Prognostic factors for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section – analysis of 162 cases. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2010;60(6):498–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Harper LM, Cahill AG, Roehl KA, Odibo AO, Stamilio DM, Macones GA. The pattern of labor preceding uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(3):210. e1-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ho SY, Chang SD, Liang CC. Simultaneous uterine and urinary bladder rupture in an otherwise successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. J Chin Med Assoc. 2010;73(12):655–9. doi:10.1016/S1726-4901(10)70143-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hudic I, Bujold E, Fatusic Z, Roberge S, Mandzic A, Fatusic J. Risk of uterine rupture following locked vs unlocked single-layer closure. Med Arch. 2012;66(6):412–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kok N, Ruiter L, Hof M, Ravelli A, Mol BW, Pajkrt E, Kazemier B. Risk of maternal and neonatal complications in a subsequent pregnancy after planned caesarean section in a first birth, compared with emergency caesarean section: a nationwide comparative cohort study. BJOG. 2014;121(2):216–23. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12483.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Laflamme SM, Jastrow N, Girard M, Paris G, Bérubé L, Bujold E. Pitfall in ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar from prior preterm cesarean section. AJP Rep. 2011;1(1):65–8. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1284222. Epub 2011 Jul 22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Madaan M, Agrawal S, Nigam A, Aggarwal R, Trivedi SS. Trial of labour after previous caesarean section: the predictive factors affecting the outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(3):224–8. doi:10.3109/01443615.2010.544426.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mansour GM, El-Mekkawi SF, Khairy HT, Mossad AE. Feasibility of prediction of cesarean section scar dehiscence in the third trimester by three-dimensional ultrasound. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(8):944–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Micek M, Kosinska-Kaczynska K, Godek B, Krowicka M, Szymusik I, Wielgos M. Birth after a previous cesarean section – what is most important in making a decision? Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2014;35(8):718–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mohammed AB, Al-Moghazi DA, Hamdy MT, Mohammed EM. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in pregnant women with previous cesarean section. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2010;15(3):188–93. doi:10.1016/j.mefs.2010.06.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mwenda AS. 4th stage transvaginal omental herniation during VBAC complicated by shoulder dystocia: a unique presentation of uterine rupture. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:76 (ISSN: 1471-2393).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Oyelese Y, Tchabo JG, Chapin B, Nair A, Hanson P, McLaren R. Conservative management of uterine rupture diagnosed prenatally on the basis of sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22:977–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Perrotin F, Marret H, Fignon A, Body G, Lansac J. Scarred uterus: is a routine exploration of the cesarean scar after vaginal birth always necessary? [Article in French]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1999;28(3):253–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Qureshi B, Inafuku K, Oshima K, Masamoto H, Kanazawa K. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment to predict the integrity and quality of cesarean scar during pregnancy: a prospective study. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1997;183(1):55–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. RCOG guidelines Birth after Previous Caesarean Birth (Green-top Guideline No. 45) Published: 01/10/2015 https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg45/. Accessed on 16 Apr 2016.

  37. Roberge S, Chaillet N, Boutin A, Moore L, Jastrow N, Brassard N, Gauthier RJ, Hudic I, Shipp TD, Weimar CH, Fatusic Z, Demers S, Bujold E. Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;115(1):5–10. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.04.013. Epub 2011 Jul 26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schoorel EN, van Kuijk SM, Melman S, et al. Vaginal birth after a caesarean section: the development of a Western European population-based prediction model for deliveries at term. BJOG. 2014;121(2):194–201. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12539; discussion 201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Scifres CM, Rohn A, Odibo A, Stamilio D, Macones GA. Predicting significant maternal morbidity in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean section. Am J Perinatol. 2011;28(3):181–6. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1266159. Epub 2010 Sep 14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sevket O, Ates S, Molla T, Ozkal F, Uysal O, Dansuk R. Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on the healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;125(3):219–22. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.11.013. Epub 2014 Feb 28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sharma C, Surya M, Soni A, Soni P, Verma A, Verma S. Sonographic prediction of scar dehiscence in women with previous cesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2015;65(2):97–103. doi:10.1007/s13224-014-0630-4. Epub 2014 Nov 4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sinha M, Gupta R, Gupta P, Rani R, Kaur R, Singh R. Uterine rupture: a seven year review at a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India. Indian J Community Med. 2016;41(1):45–9. doi:10.4103/0970-0218.170966.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Smith GC, White IR, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Predicting cesarean section and uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after prior cesarean section. PLoS Med. 2005;2(9):e252. Epub 2005 Sep 13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous Caesarean birth. No 155 (Replaces guideline No 147), February 2005. http://sogc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/155E-CPG-February2005.pdf 10.3109/14767058.2014.938626. Epub 2014 Jul 22. Accessed 16 Mar 2016.

  45. Stitely ML, Craw S, Africano E, Reid R. Uterine scar dehiscence associated with misoprostol cervical priming for surgical abortion: a case report. J Reprod Med. 2015;60(9–10):445–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sun CH, Liao CI, Kan YY. “Silent” rupture of the unscarred gravid uterus with subsequent pelvic abscess: successful laparoscopic management. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(6):519–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Uharček P, Brešťanský A, Ravinger J, Máňová A, Zajacová M. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness at term in women with previous cesarean delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292(3):609–12. doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3687-0. Epub 2015 Mar 27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Veena P, Habeebullah S, Chaturvedula A. A review of 93 cases of ruptured uterus over a period of 2 years in a tertiary care hospital in South India. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;32(3):260–3. doi:10.3109/01443615.2011.638091.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yang B. Bladder rupture associated with uterine rupture at delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(5):625–7. doi:10.1007/s00192-010-1318-7. Epub 2010 Nov 25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang J, Chen SF, Luo YE. Asymptomatic spontaneous complete uterine rupture in a term pregnancy after uterine packing during previous caesarean section: a case report. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2014;41(5):597–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dorairajan, G. (2017). Rupture of the Uterus Scarred Due to Previous Caesarean Section. In: Ruptured Uterus. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2852-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2852-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2850-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2852-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics