Abstract
This chapter’s purpose is to share the findings after engaging Technology Education (TE) teachers through an action research (AR) study. The chapter examines the claim that AR could be used as a vehicle for professional development of underqualified and unqualified TE teachers. The findings of this study indicate that AR impacted on TE teachers’ classroom practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ankiewicz, P., De Swardt, E., Gross, E., & Reddy, V. (2003). The essential features of technology and technology education: A conceptual framework for the development of OBE-related programmes in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 27–45.
Burke, J., & Larry, C. (2004). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
De Dakar, P. (n.d). Universal primary education in Africa: The teacher challenge. Breda: UNESCO.
Department of Basic Education. (2011). Education in South Africa [Online]. Available at: http://www.southafrica.info/about/education/education.htm. Accessed on 24 Mar 2011.
Department of Education. (2003). Revised national curriculum statement grades R-9 (schools): Teacher’s guide for developing learning programmes in technology. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Gittings, J. (1988). Conference impressions. Newsletter of Southern Association for Learning and Educational Disabilities, 7(3).
Horkheimer, M. (1982). Critical theory. New York: Seabury Press.
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2004). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Mapotse, T. A. (2012). The teaching practice of senior phase technology education teachers in selected schools of Limpopo Province: An action research study. Pretoria: DEd, University of South Africa.
Mapotse, T. A. (2014). An emancipation paradigm through critical theory in technology education: An action learning paradigm. Mediterranean Journal of Social Science. 5(3), 484–493. ISSN No: 2039–9340 (print)/ISSN No: 2039–2117 (online). Web: http://www.mcser.org
Mapotse, T. A. (2015). An emancipation framework for technology education teachers: An action research study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25, 213–225. doi: 10.1007/s10798-014-9275-y, Springer Publishers. ISSN No: 0957–7572 (print)/ISSN No: 1573–1804 (online). Web: http://download.springer.com
Mills, G. E. (2000). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
Mokhele, M. L. (2011). Teachers’ perspectives on continuing professional development: a case study of the Mpumalanga secondary science initiative (MSSI) project. DEd thesis, University of South Africa, Pretoria.
Pihama, L. (1993). Tungia te Ururua Kia Tupu o te Harakeke: A critical analysis of parents as first teachers. MA thesis, University of Auckland.
Pudi, T. I. (Ed.). (2007). Understanding technology education from a South African perspective (pilot ed.). Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Riel, M. (2010). Understanding action research. Centre for Collaborative Action Research. Pepperdine University. Available at: http://cadres.pepperdine.edu/ccar/define.html. Accessed on 20 Oct 2014.
Tooley, W. R. (2000). Political rationality & government mechanisms: Maori education policy in the new millennium. MA in Education dissertation, University of Auckland, Auckland.
Acknowledgment
My immeasurable gratitude goes to my Saviour Jesus Christ, who let wonderful people (too many to thank individually) to cross my path of knowledge acquisition. I want to express my indebtedness particularly to the following for their unreserved support:
• Prof M.T. Gumbo, my supervisor, mentor, friend and colleague.
• My dear wife Koena Catherine and my offspring: Phenyo, Thapelo, Kholofelo and Asanda
• Mr. Magagane, the Mankweng Circuit Manager and Limpopo Provincial Education Department.
• All participants and their SMTs in selected schools.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Additional information
An electronic copy of the PhD thesis can be found at this url: http://uir.unisa.ac.za/xmlui/handle/10500/7717?show=full
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mapotse, T.A. (2017). Technology Education Teachers’ Professional Development Through Action Research. In: Williams, P., Barlex, D. (eds) Contemporary Research in Technology Education. Contemporary Issues in Technology Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2819-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2819-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2817-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2819-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)