Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Student Approaches to Learning, Conceptions of Mathematics, and Successful Outcomes in Learning Mathematics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Success in Higher Education

Abstract

In this chapter, I concentrate on success as the completion of a degree and investigate mathematics as a key component in that success. I examine the connections between approaches to learning, conceptions of mathematics, and student performance as measured by their grades. This study highlights practical implications for mathematics in higher education, draws from the comprehensive report of the Enhancing Teaching-Learning Environments project by Hounsell and Entwistle (ETL shortened experiences of teaching and learning questionnaire [measurement instrument] 2005), and extends the international research on student conceptions of mathematics by Wood et al. (Becoming a mathematician, Springer, Dordrecht 2012). Surveys were used to investigate the learning experience of a random sample of first year mathematics students in Australia and New Zealand. This chapter highlights two key findings of relevance to teachers and curriculum developers: firstly, that successful mathematics performance was strongly associated with deep approaches to learning, organised approaches to learning, and a cohesive conception of mathematics; and secondly, that surface approaches to learning were negatively related to modelling and the abstract conceptions of mathematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Developing the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (2010). Review of education in mathematics, data science and quantitative disciplines. Retrieved from https://go8.edu.au/publication/go8-review-education-mathematics-data-science-and-quantitative-disciplines

  • Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cano, F., & Berbén, A. B. G. (2009). University students’ achievement goals and approaches to learning in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 131–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1994). Conceptions of mathematics and how it is learned: The perspectives of students entering university. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 331–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1998a). Qualitatively different experiences of learning mathematics at university. Learning and Instruction, 8(5), 455–468. doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(98)00005-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1998b). University mathematics students’ conceptions of mathematics. Studies in Higher Education, 23(1), 87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croft, A. C., Harrison, M. C., & Robinson, C. L. (2009). Recruitment and retention of students—An integrated and holistic vision of mathematics support. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology, 40(1), 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dancey, C., & Reidy, J. (2004). Statistics without maths for psychology: Using SPSS for windows. London, UK: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations. (2011). Developing a framework for teaching and learning standards in Australian higher education and the role of TEQSA. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. (2005, September). Ways of thinking and ways of teaching across contrasting subject areas. Paper presented at the 13th improving student learning symposium: Improving student learning through assessment, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N., Nisbet, J., & Bromage, A. (2005). Teaching-learning environments and student learning in electronic engineering. In L. Verschaffel, E. D. Corte, G. Kanselaar, & M. Valcke (Eds.), Powerful environments for promoting deep conceptual and strategic learning. Studia Paedagogica 41 (pp. 175–198). Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenollar, P., Román, S., & Cuestas, P. J. (2007). University students’ academic performance: An integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 873–891. doi:10.1348/000709907X189118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hounsell, D., & Entwistle, N. (2005). ETL shortened experiences of teaching and learning questionnaire [Measurement Instrument]. Retrieved from http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/publications.html#measurement

  • Hounsell, D., Entwistle, N., Anderson, C., Bromage, A., Day, K., Hounsell, J., et al. (2005). Enhancing teaching-learning environments in undergraduate courses: End-of award report to ESRC. Retrieved from http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/

  • International Engineering Alliance. (2009). Graduate attributes and professional competencies profile. Retrieved from http://www.ieagreements.org

  • Khiat, H. (2010). A grounded theory approach: Conceptions of understanding in engineering mathematics learning. The Qualitative Report, 15, 1459–1488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, P., & Biggs, J. B. (1994). Who benefits from mastery learning? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liston, M., & O’Donoghue, J. (2009). Factors influencing the transition to university service mathematics: Part 1. A quantitative study. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 28(2), 77–87. doi:10.1093/teamat/hrp006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macbean, J. (2004). Students’ conceptions of, and approaches to, studying mathematics as a service subject at undergraduate level. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology, 35(4), 553–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manukau Institute of Technology. (2014). Annual report 2014. Retrieved from https://www.manukau.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/193987/MKT070-2014-Annual-Report-LRES.pdf

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, P. M. (2006). Doing survey research: A guide to quantitative methods (2nd ed.). Boston, USA: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Tertiary Education Commission. (2014). Tertiary education strategy: 2014–2019. Retrieved from http://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Further-education/Tertiary-Education-Strategy.pdf

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation Development. (2013). Assessment of higher education learning outcomes feasibility study report: Volume 3. Further insights. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/AHELOFSReportVolume3.pdf

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (2005). The context of learning in academic departments. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (pp. 198–216). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (2005). Students’ approaches to learning and teachers’ approaches to teaching in higher education. Educational Psychology, 25(3), 673–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senko, C., & Miles, M. K. (2008). Pursuing their own learning agenda: How mastery-oriented students jeopardize their class performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 561–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Y., Croft, T., & Lawson, D. (2010). Safety in numbers: Mathematics support centres and their derivatives as social learning spaces. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 421–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. A., & Morgan, M. J. (1999). Mathematics support program for commencing engineering students between 1990 and 1996: An Australian case study. International Journal of Engineering Education, 15(6), 486–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. (2011). Higher education standards framework (threshold standards). Retrieved from http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2012L00003/Download

  • Thomas, M., Klymchuk, S., Hong, Y. Y., Kerr, S., McHardy, A., Murphy, P., et al. (2010). The transition from secondary to tertiary mathematics education. Retrieved from http://www.tlri.org.nz/sites/default/files/projects/9262SummaryReport.pdf

  • Wood, L., Petocz, P., & Reid, A. (2012). Becoming a mathematician. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Manukau Institute of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand

    Priscilla E. L. Murphy

Authors
  1. Priscilla E. L. Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priscilla E. L. Murphy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

    Leigh N. Wood

  2. Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

    Yvonne A. Breyer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murphy, P.E.L. (2017). Student Approaches to Learning, Conceptions of Mathematics, and Successful Outcomes in Learning Mathematics. In: Wood, L., Breyer, Y. (eds) Success in Higher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2791-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2791-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2789-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2791-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation